Another plank knocked out of ObamaCare... Fed Judge Rules Against Birth Control Mandate (county, program)

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by AguaDulce

You are advocating free birth control.

My assertion is that there already IS free birth control, one just has to reach out and ask for it.

It's easier to get free condoms than it is to get free birth control pills.

Exactly! According to Planned Parenthood, condoms are 98% effective at preventing pregnancy when used correctly every time.

PLUS, there's the added bonus of NO medically harmful hormonal side effects to women.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by staywarm2

So do you oppose birth control on religious grounds?

No. I oppose providing it for free via confiscating others' earned income at the penalty of imprisonment. Make free birth control pharmaceuticals and devices funded 100% from VOLUNTARY donations, and I'm good with that.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by AguaDulce

Maybe she has a life.

Why are you asking her a question that she has already answered?

Yes. Thank you. I DO have a life. I already posted my answer, though as AguaDulce states, my position is not based on religion, it's based on my opposition to forced coercion.

Originally Posted by staywarm2

So do you oppose birth control on religious grounds?

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by staywarm2

Do you have some problem with people having sex?

Not at all. Just fund it yourselves.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

So, how do you propose to fix un-responsible people?

Let nature take it's coarse. That's what evolution is all about. Does the left now suddenly NOT believe in evolution?

[AguaDulce]

"Let nature take it's (sic) coarse (sic). That's what evolution is all about. Does the left now suddenly NOT believe in evolution?"

It's interesting that you bring up evolution to bolster your argument and to take yet another swipe at "the left."

Social Darwinism isn't part of the theory of evolution.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by AguaDulce

It's interesting that you bring up evolution to bolster your argument and to take yet another swipe at "the left."

Social Darwinism isn't part of the theory of evolution.

What makes any supposed "social Darwinism" (and that's a false construct) any different than natural selection Darwinism?

[AguaDulce]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

What makes any supposed "social Darwinism" (and that's a false construct) any different than natural selection Darwinism?

Could you elaborate on how evolution plays into your argument? Perhaps I misunderstood.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by AguaDulce

Could you elaborate on how evolution plays into your argument? Perhaps I misunderstood.

Those not able to survive via their own means or via the voluntarily given benevolence of others, perish.

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

You have concocted a rationale to support your own personal opinion. Too bad it's not mandated anywhere in the US Constitution, meaning that others cannot have their earnings confiscated to support the goals you personally support.

If you don't like the way things are... VOLUNTARILY DONATE to the causes you support.

There is no issue with the Constitution whatsoever, as already shown. What you call "confiscation", the Constitution calls "Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises".

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

You prefer the government "confiscate" even more money to deal with the problems stemming from the inaction which you promote. When the problems occur, you will once again blame someone else, and insist personal responsibility is the key, but never share how your will make people more responsible.

I'd rather pay little to prevent the problem, than pay a lot to deal with the problem after it happens.