Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2019, 06:11 PM
 
33,315 posts, read 12,546,342 times
Reputation: 14946

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacobo1 View Post
thats not her home stop with the lies
The red brick home (not the white one) that is part of that link is Nancy's San Francisco house, but Laura Loomer was at Nancy's other SF Bay Area residence...her Napa Valley estate....which does have a wall. A short wall...but nonetheless a wall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2019, 06:21 PM
 
33,315 posts, read 12,546,342 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Oh but it is... How do you like your crow served?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/is...-pelosis-home/
The white house that dominates your link (and arguably has a wall or doesn't) does not belong to Nancy Pelosi.

The red brick house (without a wall) that is much less prominently featured in your link is Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco house.

The property where Laura Loomer was 'broadcasting' from is located in the Napa Valley (also part of the Bay Area), does have a wall, does belong to Nancy Pelosi, and is her other Bay Area residence.

The facts don't support serving crow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 06:24 PM
 
33,315 posts, read 12,546,342 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Yeah, but unlike you I understood it. The house you mentioned was purported to be Nancy's, it's not, but if you had bothered to read the entire page Nancy's actual house is pictured....
And you still didn't bother to learn all of the facts. Pelosi has two Bay Area residences. Loomer was at the other one, which does have a wall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 06:31 PM
 
33,315 posts, read 12,546,342 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
How do you like your crow, cooked or raw?

https://www.politifact.com/facebook-...ind-high-wall/
Again, you and your link are ignoring Pelosi's other residence in the Bay Area, which does have a wall.

Have you ever been to the Bay Area?

I'm a 5th generation Bay Area native, and I know a number of people who have or have had multiple residences (owning both...or more..at the same time) in the Bay Area.......including members of my own family.

No justification for any crow to be served.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 06:39 PM
 
33,315 posts, read 12,546,342 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
How lost must one’s argument on immigration be when it’s proponent has to try to support it by speculating about the existence of a wall near an unpictured part of a politician’s house?
Except the spirit of chucksnee's argument isn't lost.

Chucksnee and Sanspeur are just 'barking up the wrong house'.

Nancy Pelosi has two Bay Area residences.

Chucksnee and Sanspeur = arguing about one of them, Laura Loomer was at the other one...which does have a wall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 06:47 PM
 
33,315 posts, read 12,546,342 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by vacoder View Post
Correct. And pictures show it was at most a 4 foot wall. More decorative than anything else. Perhaps it could keeps some dogs in. But if you want to use this as an example of how walls fail be my guest.
Nope. Just clarifying the wall vs. no wall assertion/argument. The original argument was whether the wall Laura Loomer was 'broadcasting' about was at a Nancy Pelosi residence, or not.....not how high the wall is, whether it is effective, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 06:50 PM
 
9,742 posts, read 4,499,419 times
Reputation: 3981
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMESMH View Post
Nope. Just clarifying the wall vs. no wall assertion/argument. The original argument was whether the wall Laura Loomer was 'broadcasting' about was at a Nancy Pelosi residence, or not.....not how high the wall is, whether it is effective, etc.
The wall is irrelevant so why go on about it. There were also trees on the property. So what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Virginia
1,743 posts, read 992,793 times
Reputation: 1768
Anyone notice how lefties 'skirt' the issues when they can't defend their leader's hypocrisy?

This wasn't about the height of the wall or how a border wall would fail based on this demonstration!

This is about the elites telling us peons how Illegals have the right to crash our borders and stay in the country because it's the moral thing to do.

It is only "trespassing" when done against the elites and their nutty base!

It is only "law-breaking" when the leftists say it is!

It is only "immoral" when pointing out the Hypocrites!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 06:57 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,875 posts, read 26,526,580 times
Reputation: 25777
Loomer should take it further next time. Get out flyers to the criminal alien population about handouts, a nice BBQ and a place to set up some tents-on Pelosi's property. Make sure they plan on staying for a while...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 07:00 PM
 
46,307 posts, read 27,124,387 times
Reputation: 11135
Quote:
Originally Posted by claymoore View Post
Anyone notice how lefties 'skirt' the issues when they can't defend their leader's hypocrisy?

This wasn't about the height of the wall or how a border wall would fail based on this demonstration!

This is about the elites telling us peons how Illegals have the right to crash our borders and stay in the country because it's the moral thing to do.

It is only "trespassing" when done against the elites and their nutty base!

It is only "law-breaking" when the leftists say it is!

It is only "immoral" when pointing out the Hypocrites!

Heck yea, look at the post 58, just before your's....now wall don't matter...

's


There were also trees.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top