Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The red brick home (not the white one) that is part of that link is Nancy's San Francisco house, but Laura Loomer was at Nancy's other SF Bay Area residence...her Napa Valley estate....which does have a wall. A short wall...but nonetheless a wall.
The white house that dominates your link (and arguably has a wall or doesn't) does not belong to Nancy Pelosi.
The red brick house (without a wall) that is much less prominently featured in your link is Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco house.
The property where Laura Loomer was 'broadcasting' from is located in the Napa Valley (also part of the Bay Area), does have a wall, does belong to Nancy Pelosi, and is her other Bay Area residence.
Yeah, but unlike you I understood it. The house you mentioned was purported to be Nancy's, it's not, but if you had bothered to read the entire page Nancy's actual house is pictured....
And you still didn't bother to learn all of the facts. Pelosi has two Bay Area residences. Loomer was at the other one, which does have a wall.
Again, you and your link are ignoring Pelosi's other residence in the Bay Area, which does have a wall.
Have you ever been to the Bay Area?
I'm a 5th generation Bay Area native, and I know a number of people who have or have had multiple residences (owning both...or more..at the same time) in the Bay Area.......including members of my own family.
How lost must one’s argument on immigration be when it’s proponent has to try to support it by speculating about the existence of a wall near an unpictured part of a politician’s house?
Except the spirit of chucksnee's argument isn't lost.
Chucksnee and Sanspeur are just 'barking up the wrong house'.
Nancy Pelosi has two Bay Area residences.
Chucksnee and Sanspeur = arguing about one of them, Laura Loomer was at the other one...which does have a wall.
Correct. And pictures show it was at most a 4 foot wall. More decorative than anything else. Perhaps it could keeps some dogs in. But if you want to use this as an example of how walls fail be my guest.
Nope. Just clarifying the wall vs. no wall assertion/argument. The original argument was whether the wall Laura Loomer was 'broadcasting' about was at a Nancy Pelosi residence, or not.....not how high the wall is, whether it is effective, etc.
Nope. Just clarifying the wall vs. no wall assertion/argument. The original argument was whether the wall Laura Loomer was 'broadcasting' about was at a Nancy Pelosi residence, or not.....not how high the wall is, whether it is effective, etc.
The wall is irrelevant so why go on about it. There were also trees on the property. So what?
Loomer should take it further next time. Get out flyers to the criminal alien population about handouts, a nice BBQ and a place to set up some tents-on Pelosi's property. Make sure they plan on staying for a while...
Anyone notice how lefties 'skirt' the issues when they can't defend their leader's hypocrisy?
This wasn't about the height of the wall or how a border wall would fail based on this demonstration!
This is about the elites telling us peons how Illegals have the right to crash our borders and stay in the country because it's the moral thing to do.
It is only "trespassing" when done against the elites and their nutty base!
It is only "law-breaking" when the leftists say it is!
It is only "immoral" when pointing out the Hypocrites!
Heck yea, look at the post 58, just before your's....now wall don't matter...
's
There were also trees.....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.