***SCOTUS Decisions Summer 2022*** (Representatives, abuse, federal government, programs)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ha ha ha. The last 3 justices were chosen based in their political beliefs.
Nice try.
But last 3 were chosen on whether they would obey and uphold the Constitution - a very different criteria from previous justices' selections.
That the criteria for choosing the last 3 ran contrary to the desires and beliefs of far-left liberals, is irrelevant. Except to the far-left liberals, of course.
But that's what the liberals get for being wrong so consistently and for so long. They finally ran into a duly-appointed group they couldn't bully, lie to, and intimidate.... and who knew far more about the Constitution and US law than the leftist ever will.
That blows their entire agenda.
Next on the docket (eventually): the badly-decided US v. Miller case from 1939.
Someone's upset that she cannot murder children, if she so chooses...
This issue will energize already enthused Republicans just as much as it may energize some Democrats... People care a lot more about not being able to put food on the table and gasoline in their cars...
People care about day to day issues until a family member has an unwanted or unplanned pregnancy. Then the whole family is affected and cares.
The right shooting itself squarely in the foot, and snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
If the far right thinks the left will sit idly by and allow contraception, and same sex relationships to be outlawed, they're grievously mistaken.
THIS is the kind of stuff that will make the midterms not a runaway. At all.
And you were so close . . .
Yep. All of those who keep screaming about their rights being taken away should hit the streets over this one. A LOT of those who aren't screaming but are certainly paying attention are going to hit the ballot boxes this November. At this point, nobody has a lock on the Midterms.
" The process/fee to purchase a weapon is no different then purchasing a bullhorn/...."
B.S.
You have to have a background check, which most states charge you a fee to buy a gun.
Do you know any states that requires a background check, and charges you a fee to buy any of the items you listed?
I think you missed my point. Paying for a gun is not "paying for a right" like some have compared it. It's not a requirement to exercise your 2A right like paying for a permits would be. I am against the end purchaser having to pay these fees. If the government requires a background check they should foot the bill.
Yep. All of those who keep screaming about their rights being taken away should hit the streets over this one. A LOT of those who aren't screaming but are certainly paying attention are going to hit the ballot boxes this November. At this point, nobody has a lock on the Midterms.
I tend to agree but this is exactly what the leak forced. The leak made it so the court had to go through with it right now.
Nice to see Roberts come around on the 6-3 ruling ending Roe and Casey.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
