Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"Smartened up and walked away!"
(set 28 days ago)
11,794 posts, read 5,801,446 times
Reputation: 14221
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove
It's pretty funny considering what Conservatives have been doing - boycotting everything that offends the and going after companies that dare to disagree. Musk himself has applauded many of these actions very boldly on Twitter. But when it comes to his own company, he doesn't like it at all. It seems the only ads on Twitter these days are random items that used to be sold on late night television and that probably doesn't get a lot of ad revenue. Liberals don't have to support Twitter. Let that sink in!
You fight fire with fire and it's about time. Why should conservatives keep taking the high road and being quirt?
I think it really begs the question why bother though with buying out a loser company like Twitter that was in bad shape if you're just going to close it down. Strange, but Musk was always erratic and more so as the years have gone on.
Mid-life crisis. Some men buy sportscars, but centibillionaires go a little wilder.
False flag. It isn’t appropriate to compare old Twitter revenue to new Twitter. Old twitter was full of bots and fake accounts to boost its numbers. Any number from pre-Musk Twitter should be ignored.
That and it's social media. They fall out of favor as time goes on.
Given Facebook was started before Twitter -- do you think then we should have seen a 'falling our of favor' with regards to ad revenue there?
Because it hasn't happened.
Lots of 'theories' on ad revenue for social media platforms without any real historical data to substantiate the theories.
I do believe companies stop advertising not as some wild statement, but because there was an unknown. It is up to Twitter to woo them back. That's why he hired an advertising/marketing specialist for a CFO and not a social media specialist or money cruncher.
False flag. It isn’t appropriate to compare old Twitter revenue to new Twitter. Old twitter was full of bots and fake accounts to boost its numbers. Any number from pre-Musk Twitter should be ignored.
Ultimately whoever was on Twitter -- the success isn't measured by the characteristics of the users but the number of users and the ad dollars spent to keep Twitter going.
Musk is hoping to win back some of those dollars. Won't happen if the Twitter users/activity doesn't return to its glory days.
Ultimately whoever was on Twitter -- the success isn't measured by the characteristics of the users but the number of users and the ad dollars spent to keep Twitter going.
Musk is hoping to win back some of those dollars. Won't happen if the Twitter users/activity doesn't return to its glory days.
But also operating expenses. He did save a ton of money by cutting staff.
I have no problem with Musk pouring money into Twitter. I don't think it will change a thing for conservatives and I don't think Musk is going to do anything that changes the perception advertisers already have of him and Twitter.
With conservatives going after Bud Light and Target, odds are it will be jobs held by conservatives that will be the true cost.
lol Based on what?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
