Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The open disregard for Kamala Harris is not just a Republican phenomenon. Her dismal popularity reflects that such disappointment in her is bipartisan. And now the likely machinations mentioned to keep her out of the presidency are undoing all the racial and gender pandering that explain her otherwise inexplicable appointment in the first place. At some point the Democratic identity-politics base is going to pressure the party’s hierarchy to back off and back Harris or face charges of racism.
In an odd way, the Left’s tolerance of Biden’s own cognitive impairment also strengthens Harris’s case, especially among her diversity base. Kamala utters incomprehensible sentences; Joe cannot finish them. Kamala’s public declamations are kindergarten stuff; Joe’s are more nursery school level. In theory, Kamala can be coached and improve; Joe’s declines are at a geometric rate that is irreversible.
So if someone so cognitively challenged is currently President with the full assent of the Democratic Party, for what reasons does it turn its animus on a Vice President who is still relatively young and hale?
How odd that the Left knows that both the current President and Vice President should not be in either job after 2024; and yet its own prior pandering and rank politicking have made both almost impossible to remove. And how odder that the extra-legal measures the Left took to emasculate the Trump presidency are now the low standards by which an utterly corrupt Biden can be investigated, indicted, impeached, or forced to resign. https://amgreatness.com/2023/07/31/t...unsustainable/
As much as I could not stand Hillary Clinton and was in the state of jubilation when Trump beat her, I have to say if it were between the two, I believe I would have to say Hillary. Now that may just tell what I think of Kamala Harris.
Your choice?
I would have to say Hillary. At least she has a brain. And she's not high as a kite all the time.
Why would you think Hilary Clinton would be a bad president?
I am guessing the answer would be sexism and democrat hatred.
She is extremely competent.
LOL. Please explain???? You mean wiping her servers clean with a cloth? Or after very poor decisions....say....at this time what difference does it make? She is good at taking hammers to cell phones.
Hillary and Kamala are super smart, they both would make great presidents. I can't understand why there has been so much interest in Vice President Harris. Previous Vice Presidents, you rarely heard from them and didn't know want they did while they were in office.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
