Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As much as I could not stand Hillary Clinton and was in the state of jubilation when Trump beat her, I have to say if it were between the two, I believe I would have to say Hillary. Now that may just tell what I think of Kamala Harris.
I don't like Hillary one bit, but Harris would be an absolute unmitigated disaster of epic proportions, and this is exactly why she was selected as VP by the DNC. All the other boxes she checked were just an added bonus for the left.
That’s exactly why she would be less worse. And she does have a talent for speaking to the electorate as if they were six-year olds. And that’s exactly what the electorate deserves.
Bill Clinton’s wife would have been dangerous.
Thankfully, the people who count didn’t like Bill Clinton’s wife; not even Bill Clinton liked Bill Clinton’s wife, ask Bill Clinton.
I believe that smart evil would be worse than idiot evil so Hillary would be worse.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.