Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: "Pro-life" and "Pro-war" = Hypocracy?
Yes, it is hypocracy 15 60.00%
No, it's not a sin to kill people in a war 10 40.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2009, 09:54 PM
 
559 posts, read 1,467,898 times
Reputation: 219

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
You can't win wars without killing people and the US has won a lot of wars in the last 100 years. (WWI, WWII, Korea, Kosovo, etc, etc)
Yea we win wars by attacking the enemy, not innocent civilians. Sure sometimes innocent people get hurt, but why should their life be more important than a unborn baby (when it is actually a baby). The baby is innocent also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-08-2009, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Great Falls, Montana
4,002 posts, read 3,916,032 times
Reputation: 1398
Hmmm .. .. lets see now ..

Pro War ... shooting at folks that shoot back.

Pro Life ... Saving a life that knows nothing of war or shooting back ...

---

Of course, there is always the other side that says;

Lets kill the innocent unborn, and let those dirty so and so's in [insert your favorite nation] live.

---

Hey, here's a thought ... How about we don't kill anyone? ...

You Democrats and Republicans are pathetic ... you both want to kill something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 10:03 PM
 
559 posts, read 1,467,898 times
Reputation: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigskydude View Post
Hmmm .. .. lets see now ..

Pro War ... shooting at folks that shoot back.

Pro Life ... Saving a life that knows nothing of war or shooting back ...

---

Of course, there is always the other side that says;

Lets kill the innocent unborn, and let those dirty so and so's in [insert your favorite nation] live.

---

Hey, here's a thought ... How about we don't kill anyone? ...

You Democrats and Republicans are pathetic ... you both want to kill something.
Whats your plan of action then in a crisis? Talk it out? As much as I would love no more war it is in no way a reality any time soon. But you can just continue with your Miss America Pageant speech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 10:10 PM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,223,889 times
Reputation: 6964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
You can't win wars without killing people and the US has won a lot of wars in the last 100 years. (WWI, WWII, Korea, Kosovo, etc, etc)
Think of it this way, all those killed civilians were guilty of something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 10:12 PM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,223,889 times
Reputation: 6964
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowthedirtbub View Post
Yea we win wars by attacking the enemy, not innocent civilians. Sure sometimes innocent people get hurt, but why should their life be more important than a unborn baby (when it is actually a baby). The baby is innocent also.
Phosphorous bombs are wonderful in the way they burn through skin. But, so what, those people just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, so there's nothing to worry about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 10:12 PM
 
Location: Great Falls, Montana
4,002 posts, read 3,916,032 times
Reputation: 1398
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowthedirtbub View Post
Whats your plan of action then in a crisis? Talk it out? As much as I would love no more war it is in no way a reality any time soon. But you can just continue with your Miss America Pageant speech.
If America minded their own business and pulled the CIA out of the nations of the world, we would be less likely to be engaged in any war. But, America isn't happy unless they're in the middle of someone elses business.

Canada ... for instance ... how many wars have they "started" in the past 100 years ... Oh .. not many? Or maybe none?

Still ... Democrats, and Republicans in this country are pathetic .. .. it's a fact of life ... deal with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2009, 11:21 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,508,710 times
Reputation: 4586
What about "pro-life" and "pro-death penalty"? Is that hypocritical?

What about "pro-choice" and "anti-war" or "pro-choice" and "anti-death penalty"?

You could go on and on with this line of thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 01:48 AM
 
29,917 posts, read 39,550,271 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
You can't win wars without killing people and the US has won a lot of wars in the last 100 years. (WWI, WWII, Korea, Kosovo, etc, etc)
Ohh wow! I almost sent a serious reply. So you were pro NAZI? If not you wouldn't be around today? You're pro communist? Let's hope you you weren't poor, rich or smart. You wouldn't be around today.

To the CIA comment. Did we not learn from 9/11 that when we have inadequate or faulty intelligence we get hurt. Sometimes more than we can even hurt those that did the hurting. No one free will wish for war. Wars happen for a reason and thankfully much smarter people get the real intelligence while others hop on the internet to hash out their ideology enjoying every bit of the fruits of those "warmongers" labor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 01:55 AM
 
8,624 posts, read 9,110,301 times
Reputation: 2863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
I'm liberal and I'm anti-abortion and anti-war.
No hypocracy on that.

You are just one person. Most liberals are all for killing babies but against killing in wars or killing murderers. See the babies are less able to defend themselves tucked in the womb, easier target and as they say they are anti-war they still support and make excuses for the warmonger hussein obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2009, 01:56 AM
 
1,374 posts, read 1,311,476 times
Reputation: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
This is a serious question to all republicans, conservatives, libertarians, etc.

Do you think that being "Pro-life" and "Pro-war" at the same time makes a person a hypocrat?
Why not?
Doesn't matter well all going to die under a war sooner than later.
Any one watch the History channel " life after people" will this
action is on it's way and will happen. Why this will happen is an easy
topic. Any educated person can figure this out. Enjoy and say go bye....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top