Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2014, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Brentwood, Tennessee
49,927 posts, read 59,975,596 times
Reputation: 98359

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by techcrium View Post
That is what people call an ad hominem.

I invite you to search up that term.


If you somehow are unable, I will provide you the link:
Ad hominem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This ^^ is what people call "avoidance."

I would tell you to look THAT up, but you would just say the internet is "too picky."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2014, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
29,748 posts, read 34,409,851 times
Reputation: 77109
Quote:
Originally Posted by jade408 View Post
Maybe I am confused. Is the goal of dating to have lots of dates. Or to meet the right person who you want to spend a lot of time with so you can stop dating other people.

Please enlighten me.
That's the question. Does OP define "success in dating" as having a lot of dates? Getting laid? Finding a nice person to have a relationship with?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 11:54 AM
 
8,779 posts, read 9,456,933 times
Reputation: 9548
I don't think you can just "lower your standards" that's not how standards are made or upheld. Your standards are what they are because of your needs, wants and desires.

If you have certain "standards" you have to also be aware it is also limiting pool by it's very nature.
It's a quality vs quantity argument at it's core that ignores the obvious in favor of immediate gratification.

Having completely unrealistic or outlandish standards to uphold people to is another topic...but having "a" standard for what you NEED in life based of of who you are as an individual?

hell no, don't change yourself just to find another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 11:57 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,218 posts, read 107,977,655 times
Reputation: 116174
Quote:
Originally Posted by techcrium View Post
EITHER

1. Lower your pickiness/standards or whatever you want to call it.
Or change/swap your standards or whatever entomology/semantics you want to give it.
Cute, OP, cute. Dating is the study of bugs? You mean "etymology".


Carry on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 11:59 AM
 
5,121 posts, read 6,806,407 times
Reputation: 5833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
Cute, OP, cute. Dating is the study of bugs? You mean "etymology".


Carry on.
Birds and the bees! Get with it Ruth

To be fair, it's a typo I might make, but it is kind of funny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 12:10 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,858,743 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by techcrium View Post
EITHER

1. Lower your pickiness/standards or whatever you want to call it.
Or change/swap your standards or whatever entomology/semantics you want to give it.

AND/OR

2. Increase your attractiveness to the opposite sex

Discuss.
i say number two, BUT, that does not mean what you think it means OP. yes if you hit the gym, lose weight and "pump up" you can become physically attractive to women, but if you still lack confidence in yourself, what good is the physical looks? i keep telling you and others, that women truly are deeper than what you give them credit for. the problem is that us men are very visual, why? because we were the hunters in ancient times, so we had to be able to spot our prey, and be able to track it.

so when we look at women, of course we enjoy a curvy woman. but we are attracted to women based on looks at first, so we think that women are the same way, and they arent. but your mindset is such that you wont believe that even when THE WOMEN TELL YOU. so until YOU change your mindset, you are going to fail with women, and you are going to continue to come here and whine about how you cant get a date, despite the fact that everyone tells you what you need to do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jade408 View Post
Maybe I am confused. Is the goal of dating to have lots of dates. Or to meet the right person who you want to spend a lot of time with so you can stop dating other people.

Please enlighten me.
yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 12:20 PM
SF
 
286 posts, read 324,875 times
Reputation: 207
Well in my view both are wrong.


Explained below:

Quote:
Originally Posted by techcrium View Post
EITHER

1. Lower your pickiness/standards or whatever you want to call it.
Or change/swap your standards or whatever entomology/semantics you want to give it.

No, you shouldn't lower your standards by any means, having high standards are good, yes the important point is they should be realistic, having high standards means you know yourself well and you know what you want. You shouldn't settle for something less than that. It will leave you unhappy in the long run.

Hence this is wrong and shouldn't be done..


Quote:
Originally Posted by techcrium View Post
AND/OR


2. Increase your attractiveness to the opposite sex

Discuss.

Firstly , you have not defined attractiveness properly, I mean in what aspect?

Is it having only attractive personality or only attractive looks or overall attractiveness which includes both looks and personality?, so what is it according to you.

Anyway,

I agree with this to some extent, of course attractiveness is important, you should have attractive/ good looks and also you must have a good personality which makes you even more attractive overall, but there are two points to remember here.

1. In my view the term "attractiveness" is a subjective term, let's say for example one woman may not find you attractive as per the way she perceives you overall, on the other hand some other woman will find you very attractive overall as per her perception. Hence attractiveness here is subjective and depends and will be different for different women and so will keep changing this way.


2. What you must know is beyond a certain limit you can't improve your attractiveness, of course there are no limits , I didn't mean that, what I am trying to say is you shouldn't go beyond a certain limit to make yourself attractive to women, as that would mean, you value what the opposite gender thinks about you, rather than being confident about yourself and your attractiveness. You will then begin to change yourself to the extent of appearing as attractive to women. You should never do that. Not required at all.

If at all women have to find you attractive, let them get attracted to who you are, and what you are instead of getting attracted to what you are showing them, which may or may not be true at all.

Hence in my view you are either naturally attractive to women or you are not, that's the way it is. Whatever it may be , you should never change yourself.


Hope you got my point.

Hence in my view both the points that you have mentioned are wrong. Dating success depends on many other factors, I think so.

Last edited by SF; 08-06-2014 at 01:22 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 12:23 PM
 
8,518 posts, read 15,646,492 times
Reputation: 7712
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
You're repeated postings of random poorly reasoned or worded "hypotheses" to generate discussion, then you're convoluted illogical analysis of the responses, followed by your disappearance... only to be followed by another equally inane posting is really pretty annoying.
Maybe we should discuss this instead. What compels a person to exhibit such behavior? Why do these people start threads that claim to be about discussing a topic, but really they're just a way for the person to spout his own views?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 12:53 PM
 
663 posts, read 778,468 times
Reputation: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by rego00123 View Post
I don't think you can just "lower your standards" that's not how standards are made or upheld. Your standards are what they are because of your needs, wants and desires.

If you have certain "standards" you have to also be aware it is also limiting pool by it's very nature.
It's a quality vs quantity argument at it's core that ignores the obvious in favor of immediate gratification.

Having completely unrealistic or outlandish standards to uphold people to is another topic...but having "a" standard for what you NEED in life based of of who you are as an individual?

hell no, don't change yourself just to find another.

Ok. So if you are unwilling to compromise (1), then you have to deal with (2).

So you have to increase attractiveness to the opposite gender. That can either be, physical, or be more intelligent, or be more confident, outgoing, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2014, 12:55 PM
 
663 posts, read 778,468 times
Reputation: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by SF View Post
Well in my view both are wrong.
...
Anyway,

I agree with this to some extent, of course attractiveness is important, you should have attractive/ good looks and also you must have a good personality which makes you even more attractive overall, but there are two points to remember here.

...
???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top