Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Talking about women in numbers is what guys from the pick-up community do. And those definitely have serious problems! Do they actually care about the woman as a human being, her personality? Seems it's only about the looks. This somehow reflects their distorted view of women, which seems to be the root of their own problems.
Seriously, knock this crap off. This is not a relationship topic, you have serious issues with self that would best be served in the psychology or mental health forum.
As I responded to you in another post, how is any of this helping you get a date? Your peers are dating, and you're searching youtube videos to try and make some ridiculous point that doesn't matter and no one cares about but you. Get off the internet and go outside for heaven's sake!
I don't see how people here DONT have a rating system.
By definition if you have PREFERENCES, then by definition you have a rating scale.
Take 3 guys, you probably prefer guy A over B, and B over C.
There, by definition that is your rating system already.
A is probably a 7
Since you prefer A over B, then B must be lower than A, so probably a 5-6?
Since you prefer B over C, then C must be lower than B, so probably a 3-4?
I think many people are just unwilling to admit it.
Nope.
Preferences encompass a multitude of qualities, many of which in combination can be attractive depending on who's looking, but calling someone a 7 reduces a person to 1 subjective number. It's juvenile.
I don't see how people here DONT have a rating system.
By definition if you have PREFERENCES, then by definition you have a rating scale.
Take 3 guys, you probably prefer guy A over B, and B over C.
There, by definition that is your rating system already.
A is probably a 7
Since you prefer A over B, then B must be lower than A, so probably a 5-6?
Since you prefer B over C, then C must be lower than B, so probably a 3-4?
I think many people are just unwilling to admit it.
Exactly. Talking in terms of a 0-10 scale is meant to be shorthand, to spare words. Just because women typically do not use the terminology does not mean that they don't quantify male physical attractiveness. Women talking amongst themselves pick apart a guy's height, facial structure, skin, etc., just like we pick apart a woman's boobs, face, etc.
Exactly. Talking in terms of a 0-10 scale is meant to be shorthand, to spare words. Just because women typically do not use the terminology does not mean that they don't quantify male physical attractiveness. Women talking amongst themselves pick apart a guy's height, facial structure, skin, etc., just like we pick apart a woman's boobs, face, etc.
Exactly. Talking in terms of a 0-10 scale is meant to be shorthand, to spare words. Just because women typically do not use the terminology does not mean that they don't quantify male physical attractiveness. Women talking amongst themselves pick apart a guy's height, facial structure, skin, etc., just like we pick apart a woman's boobs, face, etc.
It's not "exactly". Nice of you to rejoin your thread when someone finally agrees with you.
Someone either interests you, or they don't. It has nothing to do with numbers on a scale, because how you perceive someone is not going to be the same as how the next person perceives them, so it's irrelevant.
None of this matters, regardless of what you tell yourself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.