Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorInSpirit
Just because science said so? How can they when they were not even there?
If you get mistakes in from their dating methods as found sometimes when dating something within our known lifetime or history; how can anyone date something beyond the scope of human history without confirmation?
Living mollusks have been carbon dated at 2,300 years old dead.
Mortar from an English castle less than 800 years old -carbon 14 test dated at 7,370 years old.
Even fresh seal skins had been carbon 14 test dated at 1,300 years old.
The C-14 system depends on the idea that there has been no catastrophic event in the past fifty thousand years, and yet we are getting errors in the dating method.
So "if" the global flood happened within the 6,000 years time period, it would throw all the measurements out of whack as it also explains why there are errors in the scientific dating method that we have today.
Feel free to share why you believe that the earth is 4.54 billion years old without science and history being able to confirm it.
|
First of all C14 dating isn't used in dating anything non-organic, so trying to equate C14 dating of animals and tying that to the planets ages is useless. A more accurate dating method is called K-Ar dating, this works very well with non-organics such as rocks.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
