Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-12-2011, 04:34 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,350,015 times
Reputation: 21891

Advertisements

I plan on retiring in 30 years or so. LOL. I know it sounds like a while. Still saying that, for those that are retired now what would you do differant to be in a position to not need to work as a greeter at wal-mart? I have time on my side as far as I can see. My wife and I own our home, well we just bought it anyway and should own it in 30 years, lol. we also have a 403B retirement account that we both pay into at our employer. We work at the same hospital. I currently put in 6% with a 2% amount that the hospital gives all employees and a match of 3%. making it a total of 11% of my income going toward my 403B. My wife does the same thing. Mainly to get the maximum return with the least amount put aside. I am thinking that won't be the amount needed though to get us where we want to be in 30 or 40 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-12-2011, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,910,117 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
I plan on retiring in 30 years or so. LOL. I know it sounds like a while. Still saying that, for those that are retired now what would you do differant to be in a position to not need to work as a greeter at wal-mart? I have time on my side as far as I can see. My wife and I own our home, well we just bought it anyway and should own it in 30 years, lol. we also have a 403B retirement account that we both pay into at our employer. We work at the same hospital. I currently put in 6% with a 2% amount that the hospital gives all employees and a match of 3%. making it a total of 11% of my income going toward my 403B. My wife does the same thing. Mainly to get the maximum return with the least amount put aside. I am thinking that won't be the amount needed though to get us where we want to be in 30 or 40 years.
Indeed, this is the eternal discussion in the Retirement Forum. First, you don't say what your pension situation is. Social Security only? (Do I correctly assume that the existence of your 403B means that there is no pension from the employer other than the 403B?) That makes a difference. Second, "where we want to be" is not defined. What sort of life-style would that be? Lavish? Modest? Sounds like if you keep doing what you're doing for 30 more years, you could be just fine, provided you stay out of debt except for the house note. Not enough information to know for sure. Magazine articles on the subject seem to be written for the upper class, but many other folks retire and do just fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2011, 11:37 PM
GLS
 
1,985 posts, read 5,380,638 times
Reputation: 2472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minervah View Post
...... I am tired of thinking. My brain is retired.
I envy you. My brain remains uncontrollably on full-throttle, but my body retired some time ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2011, 11:41 PM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,202,108 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by GLS View Post
my body retired some time ago.
Mine's been on strike for a while now...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,910,117 times
Reputation: 32530
Default Body retired or body on strike

Quite often, regular exercise will get the body back to work from its retirement or from its strike picket line. For most people, its not too late to start.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,350,015 times
Reputation: 21891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
Indeed, this is the eternal discussion in the Retirement Forum. First, you don't say what your pension situation is. Social Security only? (Do I correctly assume that the existence of your 403B means that there is no pension from the employer other than the 403B?) That makes a difference. Second, "where we want to be" is not defined. What sort of life-style would that be? Lavish? Modest? Sounds like if you keep doing what you're doing for 30 more years, you could be just fine, provided you stay out of debt except for the house note. Not enough information to know for sure. Magazine articles on the subject seem to be written for the upper class, but many other folks retire and do just fine.
Pension? Who has that anymore? How many companies can you show me that have a 403B or 401K that also have a defined pension? Social Security? What is that? Their will be no Social Security in 30 years. Where we want to be is to not have to work a job in retirement. We want to live the same lifestyle that we are living now. To explain, if someone that is making $100,000 a year saves 11% of their income in a 403B retirement account can they safely asume that it will be the amount needed to sustain them for the remainder of their life and keep them in the home that they are living in? Would it be better to build the amount up to the full allowable amount which I think is $16,000 for someone under 55. Also would it be advantageous to add an IRA after maxing out the 403B? I don't plan on Social Security being there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 10:29 AM
GLS
 
1,985 posts, read 5,380,638 times
Reputation: 2472
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
Pension? Who has that anymore? How many companies can you show me that have a 403B or 401K that also have a defined pension? ........
Approximately ten years ago the large hospital system my wife works for engaged in great fanfare in announcing they would offer the employees a "choice" between a "defined benefit" vs "defined contribution" plan for their retirement. She brought home a 30 page glossy brochure explaining the differences, but it contained about a 90% slant toward the defined contribution option.

I told her that if the hospital was pushing the "defined contribution" plan that hard, it benefited them much more than the employee. Many of her colleagues gave up their traditional pension plan seduced by "window dressing" benefits such as portability. They lost about 40% of their retirement compared to where they would have been under the old defined benefit option.

In a remarkable leap of faith she listened to my advice and retained her defined benefit plan. She now grudgingly concedes that I was right on one investment decision in the past ten years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,910,117 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
Pension? Who has that anymore? How many companies can you show me that have a 403B or 401K that also have a defined pension? Social Security? What is that? Their will be no Social Security in 30 years. Where we want to be is to not have to work a job in retirement. We want to live the same lifestyle that we are living now. To explain, if someone that is making $100,000 a year saves 11% of their income in a 403B retirement account can they safely asume that it will be the amount needed to sustain them for the remainder of their life and keep them in the home that they are living in? Would it be better to build the amount up to the full allowable amount which I think is $16,000 for someone under 55. Also would it be advantageous to add an IRA after maxing out the 403B? I don't plan on Social Security being there.
There (not "their") will certainly still be Social Security in 30 years, but if you wish to plan for it not being there that is certainly reasonable and prudent. For you it will be icing on the cake, not something that you had counted on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,350,015 times
Reputation: 21891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
There (not "their") will certainly still be Social Security in 30 years, but if you wish to plan for it not being there that is certainly reasonable and prudent. For you it will be icing on the cake, not something that you had counted on.
Not sure how you figure on having Social Security. It is planned to go bankrupt. Even today no one can live on what they offer. Maybe in the days when you had 8 or 9 workers paying into it for every retired person. What happens when you have 1 worker supporting another worker? The system is only sustainable if you choose to increase the amount the current workforce will pay into the system. As of last year we spent more than we brought in. A better bet is to have the workers manage their own retirement and skip paying into a losing system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:32 PM
 
154 posts, read 357,379 times
Reputation: 109
Default DB VS DC Pension plans

Quote:
Originally Posted by GLS View Post
Approximately ten years ago the large hospital system my wife works for engaged in great fanfare in announcing they would offer the employees a "choice" between a "defined benefit" vs "defined contribution" plan for their retirement. She brought home a 30 page glossy brochure explaining the differences, but it contained about a 90% slant toward the defined contribution option.

I told her that if the hospital was pushing the "defined contribution" plan that hard, it benefited them much more than the employee. Many of her colleagues gave up their traditional pension plan seduced by "window dressing" benefits such as portability. They lost about 40% of their retirement compared to where they would have been under the old defined benefit option.

In a remarkable leap of faith she listened to my advice and retained her defined benefit plan. She now grudgingly concedes that I was right on one investment decision in the past ten years.
Yeah, and those of us who opted for this in California are being assaulted on every front for doing so!!!! I am speaking of teachers. Unbelievable!!! Folks act like I am robbing THEM of money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top