Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-17-2015, 10:20 PM
 
Location: Folsom
5,128 posts, read 9,848,983 times
Reputation: 3735

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by calnbs View Post
My brother and I watched patiently and when we felt the market have bottom out, we purchased in 2010. It was great for those who waited. Better for those who bought prior to the rise and sold it at the top and continue renting until 2010. Those people really cashed in.
I bought at the bottom as well. Sold at the top in 2005.
I hated renting.
I remember after I sold and had moved to Sacramento, I was following the The Housing Bubble Blog , and all those people were bitching and moaning about how home-ownership wasn't desirable. Makes sense as the price was rising. They'd harass anyone who took the plunge, "took the knife" as they'd say.....and today, many are still sitting on the sidelines. Even some people in the local Folsom forum questioned my buying again (while they were happily in their "owned" homes). And those people aren't active in the forum any longer.

Many of the financial "experts" are still predicting a huge economic collapse, so I may lose all eventually anyways. For now, I'm happy I bought.

Seriously, if you want/find a house that you can afford, the desired location, buy it if you want to. Or not. Do whatever makes you happy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2015, 10:51 PM
 
2,156 posts, read 3,334,757 times
Reputation: 2837
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Yep, and my husband and I made the same mistake in 2011 when we knew that when DH retired we would be moving to Sacramento, we looked at houses for $150-$200k and intuitively knew that they would never be that cheap again, but we weren't going to retire until 2014 so we would have had to rent the house out for three years, so we foolishly waited, bought in Oct 2014 and those 150k homes were selling for 280-310 ugh. In retrospect we would have been way ahead of the game if we had bought two of those homes, rented them both out, then when we retired moved into one and kept the other as an investment
I believe sister jumped in the market in 2011-2012 but she had limited income as her husband quit his job to take care of the kids. Both made the same amount except she have healthcare and he didn't. One had to quit. My sister was too picky and refused to settle, despite her limited budget. The market kept rising and now, she can no longer afford those homes she once refused to bid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2015, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
2,653 posts, read 3,050,658 times
Reputation: 2871
I still think the Sac metro area is very underrated and worth the real estate prices. The snobs on the CA coast may disagree with this statement, but that's my opinion.

I've been working with some realtors in your area recently. One thing I'm blown away by is the huge lots you have there (Carmichael, Fair Oaks, CH.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2015, 07:24 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 4,014,689 times
Reputation: 3284
Problem is too many people look at RE in short term gains. That's fine if you are a specuflipper. But otherwise you need to think in terms of a retirement portfolio. Chances are if you hold out for 20 or 30 years you are going to come out ahead. At the very least it is a great hedge against inflation too.

I always wonder about all the people who did "strategic foreclosures". Ie the people that could have stayed in their homes but walked away because they could not stomach the thought of being under water on their homes.

In the upscale parts of the Sac (East Sac, Land Park,Curtis Park) home values are getting to 2005 peak levels. Some times beyond.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2015, 08:02 PM
 
Location: Close to an earthquake
888 posts, read 890,626 times
Reputation: 2397
Quote:
Originally Posted by WizardOfRadical View Post
Problem is too many people look at RE in short term gains. That's fine if you are a specuflipper. But otherwise you need to think in terms of a retirement portfolio. Chances are if you hold out for 20 or 30 years you are going to come out ahead. At the very least it is a great hedge against inflation too.

I always wonder about all the people who did "strategic foreclosures". Ie the people that could have stayed in their homes but walked away because they could not stomach the thought of being under water on their homes.

In the upscale parts of the Sac (East Sac, Land Park,Curtis Park) home values are getting to 2005 peak levels. Some times beyond.
Agree with your long-term horizon and here in California, the benefit of Proposition 13 on property taxes makes a good real estate investment held for the long-term like a good bottle of aged wine. Despite the real estate crash, many who held residential rental real estate did not lose much rental income and the foreclosure "crisis" actually created some quality tenants who had walked from their upside down properties and needed a good rental situation for several years until they turned their credit around. So what if your rental property value dropped 25 percent if it didn't impact your net rental income. Can't go wrong in a long-term hold but location, location still is required for a good outcome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2015, 08:50 PM
 
4,031 posts, read 3,311,374 times
Reputation: 6404
Sacramento is nice but unlike Coastal California, there are are a lot fewer constraints on new construction. During the housing bust, housing prices fell in the Sacramento region below replacement costs. While housing prices have risen recently, they still haven't spiked high enough to stimulate a lot of new construction. Which is part of why housing prices are still going up, but at a certain price point, it starts making sense for the big builders to start doing much bigger housing projects and when that occurs that new housing supply tends to limit housing appreciation. If I had to guess right now, I would say low unemployment rates combined with low interest rates mean continued housing appreciation for probably the next several years until we find ourselves in the next recession.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2015, 09:39 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 4,014,689 times
Reputation: 3284
Building is starting to gear up too. Developers try to build as much at peak market as possible.

All over the Sac metro development is starting to gear up. Not at the rate of the last boom which is probably good. And so much infill going on in the grid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
2,653 posts, read 3,050,658 times
Reputation: 2871
Good points to consider, thanks.

As an potential investor in your Sac market, maybe it would be easier for me to take my chances on the stock market instead of a rental property in in Sac to make a return on my money. I know that there are lots of people that make informed decisions on this type of issue- I'm a newbie for investment properties and return on investment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top