Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > San Antonio
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2008, 09:52 AM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
8,399 posts, read 22,989,445 times
Reputation: 4435

Advertisements

Does anyone know where I can find an electronic copy of the San Antonio city boundaries map? The city web site only has an interactive GIS...

Cheers! M2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2008, 10:22 AM
 
Location: U.S.
9,510 posts, read 9,087,690 times
Reputation: 5927
Default good electronic map of San Antonio

If you want an overview, here is a good link.

www.sanantonio.gov/planning/an10yrs.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2008, 02:20 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
8,399 posts, read 22,989,445 times
Reputation: 4435
Thanks, that is better than what I found. The city limits are really weird, they run alongside the north side of Braun Road outside of 1604, but not on the south side! And what is going on outside of 1560 and 211?

Cheers! M2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2008, 07:38 AM
 
Location: U.S.
9,510 posts, read 9,087,690 times
Reputation: 5927
Default outside of 1560 & 211?



I'm not sure I understand your question but the coyotes are all over this area these days. Noisy bunch too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2008, 09:23 AM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
8,399 posts, read 22,989,445 times
Reputation: 4435
Look how the city limits run along Braun Road; my neighborhood, which is south off of Braun, is not within the city limits but the one that is on the other side of Braun from us apparantly is!

And look how the city limits follow Culebra, but basically only follow the road and the outlying areas are not within them; and out on 211 there is a section of that road that is within the city limits, but not the entire road. There is also a large area west of 211 that is within the city limits.

I just find the boundaries to be odd...

Cheers! M2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2008, 11:09 AM
 
Location: NW KCMO 64151
483 posts, read 1,563,316 times
Reputation: 108
You'll notice that the city limits also follow I-10 East out past Schertz. Most of the land north of I-10 until you get to 1604 actually is Schertz, but SA annexed the frontage so as to take advantage of the sales tax receipts from the commercial properties that will (presumably) be built there. The same thing is probably true of Culebra, except that in this case the housing developers wanted to advertise that they had "no city taxes", so some deal was worked out whereby SA would not annex those areas. I'm really just speculating on that last point, but I know Alamo Ranch and other developments have advertised that they are outside the city limits. Unless SA just didn't want to bother with infrastructure costs out there, I'm assuming they'd want to annex those areas, so perhaps a deal was struck similar to the one between SA and Timberwood Park whereby those areas would not be annexed.

As for the area west of 211, that's probably the Gov't Canyon natural area (not sure exactly what you're looking at).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2008, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Tampa
3,982 posts, read 10,462,106 times
Reputation: 1200
how much more does SA plan on annexing? the whole county?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2008, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Texas
2,438 posts, read 7,012,607 times
Reputation: 1817
Yeap Crystal.. its going to be called the Republic of San Antonio... and the flag will be a picture of the Charros... oh wait that was a few years back!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2008, 07:28 AM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
8,399 posts, read 22,989,445 times
Reputation: 4435
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldmanshirt View Post
You'll notice that the city limits also follow I-10 East out past Schertz. Most of the land north of I-10 until you get to 1604 actually is Schertz, but SA annexed the frontage so as to take advantage of the sales tax receipts from the commercial properties that will (presumably) be built there. The same thing is probably true of Culebra, except that in this case the housing developers wanted to advertise that they had "no city taxes", so some deal was worked out whereby SA would not annex those areas. I'm really just speculating on that last point, but I know Alamo Ranch and other developments have advertised that they are outside the city limits. Unless SA just didn't want to bother with infrastructure costs out there, I'm assuming they'd want to annex those areas, so perhaps a deal was struck similar to the one between SA and Timberwood Park whereby those areas would not be annexed.

As for the area west of 211, that's probably the Gov't Canyon natural area (not sure exactly what you're looking at).
OMS

You are probably right about the frontage, being outside the city limits was a big selling point in our neighborhood but we are within a stone's throw of the line.

If you look at the map johnsonkk posted there is an area that was annexed to the city sometime between 2000-2003 (circled in red) that extends into Medina County!

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c209/M2Repsol/CityLimitsExtension211.jpg (broken link)

I am really curious as to what that area is, if it is city owned property or what? The rest of that property that was annexed appears to be Govt Canyon, but I was unaware that it extended west of 211. I go down that road on a fairly regular basis, and have never noticed any indication that the park boundaries cross it. If anything, I would expect the area that makes up San Geronimo Creek to have been part of the park; but that is further south of where the red circle is.

Cheers! M2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2008, 05:30 PM
 
Location: U.S.
9,510 posts, read 9,087,690 times
Reputation: 5927
Default medina county annex?

It looks like a second quarry. Not the one that is at intersection of Culebra and 211 but farther north. You can see if fairly well on Google Earth and the continuation of the 'Galm Rd' line intersects the Medina/Bexar county line at this point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > San Antonio
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top