Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Diego
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-17-2011, 11:34 PM
 
384 posts, read 980,913 times
Reputation: 181

Advertisements

I know Abe Broudy from my high school days and know his siblings, too. He's a really nice person and VERY smart. But I live in north county and have never had him as a pediatrician for my kids.
Janine

 
Old 03-18-2011, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Santaluz - San Diego, CA
4,498 posts, read 9,384,106 times
Reputation: 2015
I'd have to agree with the vast majority here who say vaccinating is just the right thing to do. I could understand a parent's concern if it was some newer vaccination or experimental but there are many vaccinations that clearly show that they work and the science behind them is very clear and the benefits far outweigh any potential negatives. And that is the reason why many schools around the WORLD require them for kids entering schools.

I'm a former healthcare executive and one of the specialties I dealt with was providing vaccinations for employees going overseas to work on both short-term and long-term assignments. I can tell you horror stories of some people that traveled abroad because they didn't want to get vaccinated. Some even died. It was after those horrible situations that most major companies make it a requirement for their employees traveling abroad get vaccinated against the risks. Vaccinations against many diseases work.

You may think you are being a protective mother by not vaccinating but you most likely will do more harm than good.

In any event, I think it's good to think about the best case and worst case scenario with any action. Obviously you've already thought about the worst case scenarios of getting your child vaccinated. But how would you feel if your child died or got seriously ill by not getting vaccinated? Most likely you'd feel very foolish and it sounds like you haven't thought that part through... Good luck.
 
Old 03-18-2011, 06:27 PM
 
35 posts, read 140,359 times
Reputation: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdbound123 View Post
Dr. Abraham Broudy in Eastlake...is very balanced and will grant every parents personal choice although he does not fully endorse either side.
I'm not sure that I'd want a doctor who "does not fully endorse either side" of an argument. The science and supportive evidence for vaccinations is so strong that I'm not sure I would trust a physician who wouldn't strongly support their use. An honest doctor with full knowledge of the benefits of vaccines would be a very strong proponent of their use and would most certainly "endorse" one of the sides of this argument.

My wife is a pediatrician and when a parent of one of her patients is opposed to vaccination, she will make every effort to provide the parents with the evidence for the safety and efficacy of all commonly administered vaccines.

Just as you wouldn't want your mechanic to be neutral on the opinion of whether or not brakes stop cars (and not sit back and "not fully endorse either side" of the argument), you should want your physician to give you the benefit of their judgement and expertise, based on the latest scientific information available.
 
Old 03-18-2011, 08:15 PM
 
3,633 posts, read 6,173,914 times
Reputation: 11376
My boss is an immunology professor and her twin boys got all their vaccinations. She knows much more about vaccines than doctors, and wouldn't do it if she thought they were unsafe. I don't think a lot of people really understand how terrible some of the childhood diseases are. The younger generation having children now never lived through seeing friends and sibling die from them, or they'd never hesitate.

Sometimes I could just wring Wakefield's neck. It's amazing how stubbornly people are hanging on to his anti-vaccine nonsense even after The Lancet retracted the article because of bad science.
 
Old 05-06-2011, 12:26 PM
 
25 posts, read 155,940 times
Reputation: 21
I vaccinated both my children but if I had to do it over again I would take a different approach. Ends up my son is allergic to Thimerosal, which is a perservative used in vaccinations. When my son was in H.S. we had him allergy tested and he came up allergic to thimerosal (which is a very common allergy)...which means he was allergic to every vaccine he ever got! He was sickly as a baby, always crying, had lots of ear infections. In speaking to the Naturopath I go to now...I should have never vaccinated him at such a young age (or at all considering his allergy). Her take on it and what she has done with her own daughter is that infants are just too young to withstand the vaccinations they get. If they are breast fed, they are getting all the immunity they need from the breast milk. That way you can delay vaccinating until their systems have matured and then only a few vaccinations are needed and at long intervals from one another. If I had known what I know now when my kids were babies I would have done everything very differently. My son has been plagued by health issues his whole life....maybe things would have been different if he got a better start without the vaccinations. My daughter hasn't had any noticable effects of being vaccinated, but that doesn't mean she might have been better off if we waited and followed a different protocol.

More information is being uncovered about this issue and it is certainly worth continuing to look into it and research findings so we can figure out what is best for our children's health.
 
Old 05-06-2011, 01:16 PM
 
Location: 92037
4,630 posts, read 10,274,962 times
Reputation: 1955
Winterblue,

You mentioned about your son when he was a baby but I am not following what is happening to your son now that would make you think differently considering your daughter is fine?

Back on the topic about immunization. Canada seems to understand as do other industrialized nations that have high population. Taking the few singular cases and generalizing it to the masses just doesnt seem to make sense much when a child is growing. Immunization isnt a wait and see approach because the repercussions could be far worse I am sure than without. Unless you plan on never having your child leave home or be in contact with other humans.
 
Old 05-06-2011, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,105 posts, read 41,267,704 times
Reputation: 45146
Quote:
Originally Posted by winterblue View Post
I vaccinated both my children but if I had to do it over again I would take a different approach. Ends up my son is allergic to Thimerosal, which is a perservative used in vaccinations. When my son was in H.S. we had him allergy tested and he came up allergic to thimerosal (which is a very common allergy)...which means he was allergic to every vaccine he ever got! He was sickly as a baby, always crying, had lots of ear infections. In speaking to the Naturopath I go to now...I should have never vaccinated him at such a young age (or at all considering his allergy). Her take on it and what she has done with her own daughter is that infants are just too young to withstand the vaccinations they get. If they are breast fed, they are getting all the immunity they need from the breast milk. That way you can delay vaccinating until their systems have matured and then only a few vaccinations are needed and at long intervals from one another. If I had known what I know now when my kids were babies I would have done everything very differently. My son has been plagued by health issues his whole life....maybe things would have been different if he got a better start without the vaccinations. My daughter hasn't had any noticable effects of being vaccinated, but that doesn't mean she might have been better off if we waited and followed a different protocol.

More information is being uncovered about this issue and it is certainly worth continuing to look into it and research findings so we can figure out what is best for our children's health.
Normal infants are born with fully functional immune systems. It is not necessary to wait beyond the recommended schedules for vaccination to allow the system to "mature." That is a myth with no scientific support.

What proof --- beyond speculation --- do you have that any of your son's medical issues have anything to do with vaccines? Ear infections are caused by viruses and bacteria --- not vaccines.

Thimerosal in vaccines may cause sensitization to the thimerosal, but it is actually extremely rare for there to be an actual reaction to the vaccine itself. See here:

Medscape: Medscape Access

And current vaccines for infants and children are available without thimerosal:

http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/thi-table-10-0928.pdf (broken link)

It is very unlikely that thimerosal has anything to do with your son's medical issues. as far as the thimerosal allergy is concerned, he should read product labels and not use anything containing thimerosal on his skin, including contact lens solutions. He might react to those and develop a rash.
 
Old 05-06-2011, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Santaluz - San Diego, CA
4,498 posts, read 9,384,106 times
Reputation: 2015
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
Normal infants are born with fully functional immune systems. It is not necessary to wait beyond the recommended schedules for vaccination to allow the system to "mature." That is a myth with no scientific support.

What proof --- beyond speculation --- do you have that any of your son's medical issues have anything to do with vaccines? Ear infections are caused by viruses and bacteria --- not vaccines.

Thimerosal in vaccines may cause sensitization to the thimerosal, but it is actually extremely rare for there to be an actual reaction to the vaccine itself. See here:

Medscape: Medscape Access

And current vaccines for infants and children are available without thimerosal:

http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/thi-table-10-0928.pdf (broken link)

It is very unlikely that thimerosal has anything to do with your son's medical issues. as far as the thimerosal allergy is concerned, he should read product labels and not use anything containing thimerosal on his skin, including contact lens solutions. He might react to those and develop a rash.
I have to totally agree with Suzy Q. Vaccines have saved the lives of countless children around the world. It's not Quack medicine. I can't say the same of some "Naturopath"s and other type of "medicine men/women".

As I mentioned before, vaccines are proven science and proven medicine. You have to look at the overall good they have done. Sure, there are probably a very tiny percentage of people that have reactions to them but the number is so tiny compared to the massive amounts of the worldwide population they have saved lives...
 
Old 05-06-2011, 10:41 PM
 
93 posts, read 228,427 times
Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
I'd support removing a child from the home of a parent who did not have the child vaccinated. It's a form of abuse.
I find this line of thinking very disturbing.
 
Old 05-06-2011, 10:48 PM
 
93 posts, read 228,427 times
Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdbound123 View Post
Dr. Abraham Broudy in Eastlake, at Children's Primary Group, is great! He is very balanced and will grant every parents personal choice although he does not fully endorse either side. He places no judgement and he is wonderful!

Good Luck!
Finally, someone who answers the OP's question. Thank you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Diego

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top