Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-09-2009, 02:09 PM
 
824 posts, read 1,815,449 times
Reputation: 604

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasHorseLady View Post
Why are high rises necessary for a nice skyline? (In my opinion, they're not.)
TexasHorseLady -

You're wasting your time. This person has a well-earned reputation on the SA board of complaining SA's skyline, and is obsessed with a belief that "SA is falling behind Austin", etc. Of course, this person knows nothing about urbanism.

You're exactly right - a city doesn't need to have tall buildings to offer great civic life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-09-2009, 04:39 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,560,593 times
Reputation: 6323
Quote:
Originally Posted by atxcio View Post
Austin only has one completed building taller than 546' (360 Condos) and one incomplete one at 683' (Austonian). Also, the Tower of the Americas in San Antonio is over 700' with the antenna on top. They don't count observation towers in building lists, but they do show up in the skyline...

So I'd say they don't look all that different. Austin caught up quick, and may just be passing SA, with the potential for becoming far taller in the future... but as of right now, not all that different.
Sadly, the Tower of the Americas is in the skyline. Hideous!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2009, 05:21 PM
 
3,247 posts, read 9,047,815 times
Reputation: 1526
Ok, it would really help SA's skyline if it could build some new talls. Perception is half the battle. I just notice that Austin is building a l;ot of lofts in its inner city compared to East and West side of SA. I agree SA is more urban but it is behind the curve in new developments in the inner city areas. I really like Austin' s airport and diversity of restautants in relations to SA. SA has Austin beat in cultural aspect of the community.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2009, 06:43 AM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,759,681 times
Reputation: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweethomeSanAntonio View Post
San Antonio is suburban like, like all major cities, but it's urban core, is far more urban than Austin's. San Antonio is more dense than Dallas, both cities cover about the same square miles, yet San Antonio is more populated, of course not metro, DFW is far bigger.
Austin might have a new few talls, but nowhere has a urban core as big as San Antonio's.
Once you have seen the University of Texas, Soco, and downtown, Austin looks like a small town outside those areas. As far as high rise buildings, San Antonio kills Austin. San Antonio has high rises all over the city, I-10 corridor, 281 Corridor, Loop 410, Medical Center, Mid town, Broadway Corridor. Austin doesn't have these type of built up areas. If so I, haven't seen it, and I use to work in Austin and been all over Austin.

To say Austin is more urban than 300 year old San Antonio, becasue of a few new condos, is laughable. I suppose Austin is more urban than D.C. since Austin has a couple of taller new buildings.
Because San Antonio doesn't have alot of suburbs that why the population is bigger than Dallas so you can't help but live in San Antionio. In Dallas County the population is spread out where in Bexar County it is centralized in San Antionio thats why it is dense!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2009, 11:38 AM
 
2,744 posts, read 6,107,813 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladarron View Post
Because San Antonio doesn't have alot of suburbs that why the population is bigger than Dallas so you can't help but live in San Antionio. In Dallas County the population is spread out where in Bexar County it is centralized in San Antionio thats why it is dense!
I'm not comparing metro populations, just density within the first 300 square miles where it is more urban. 400, 500 square miles and beyond is nothing but sprawl.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2009, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
20,958 posts, read 45,383,992 times
Reputation: 24740
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaterry78259 View Post
Ok, it would really help SA's skyline if it could build some new talls. Perception is half the battle. I just notice that Austin is building a l;ot of lofts in its inner city compared to East and West side of SA.
And many people think that is NOT in Austin's best interests, that it doesn't need the new high-rise condos downtown and that they are not a good thing.

Perception can go both ways, and if attempts are being made to have Austin (and San Antonio, evidently) be perceived as mere clones of cities in other states, more generic, then those are attempts to ruin the perception of those two great, but very different, cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2009, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Texas
2,438 posts, read 7,010,218 times
Reputation: 1817
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladarron View Post
I have looked up the buildings in San Antonio the tallest building is 546 ft 38 stories. Why is the skyline so short Austin has taller buildings than San Antonio. Why is this????

My response to this?? who cares?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2009, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,759,681 times
Reputation: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Man in SATX View Post
My response to this?? who cares?
A lot of people care!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2009, 10:53 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
1,606 posts, read 3,409,088 times
Reputation: 2017
Half the high rises in SA are hotels. Not very entertaining. Although, the Marriott tower is very very nice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2009, 02:01 AM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
3,542 posts, read 8,243,304 times
Reputation: 3777
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladarron View Post
A lot of people care!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabetx View Post
Half the high rises in SA are hotels. Not very entertaining. Although, the Marriott tower is very very nice.
Neither of you live here... so go visit/look at pics of other towns for your skyscraper fix
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top