Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
From that story - the theory doesn't really add up. The PI just happens to find the murder weapon - and he conveniently finds pictures showing a knit cap? What would Jason's motive be to commit the murders and why would O.J. cover for him? Would anyone here spend money on the book?
So did the jury at the Emmit Till and Medgar Evers trials. But i still used my common sense.
It was basically jury nullification in my book. Look...it's not something i harp on. I was living in Europe during the O.J. trial and i paid it no mind for the most part. Didn't really care about it then, and don't care about it now. But from what i can piece together, dude is guilty.
That said, he walked. And i can't say that it changed my life in any meaningful way regardless. I took it with a grain of salt and figured that he'd get his comeuppance one day.
Naw - he lost his temper and acted stupidly going to that hotel room -and now people want to use the armed robbery conviction against him and say that it is "proof" that he is a murderer. They are two entirely unrelated incidents.
That glove didn't fit his hand. Mr. Cochran (RIP) was amazing in that trial. The state lost the case right then - when he said "if it doesn't fit - you must acquit".
Naw - he lost his temper and acted stupidly going to that hotel room -and now people want to use the armed robbery conviction against him and say that it is "proof" that he is a murderer. They are two entirely unrelated incidents.
That glove didn't fit his hand. Mr. Cochran (RIP) was amazing in that trial. The state lost the case right then - when he said "if it doesn't fit - you must acquit".
Yea, the Vegas thing is completely bogus. I will certainly agree with you on that. He's simply doing the time based on the murders in L.A. The bullsh*t they got him on in Nevada is a joke. Armed robbery my ass. They wanted to stick it to him, and they got lucky that his stupid ass was dumb enough to walk into those charges.
I know that the prime suspect was found not guilty - a verdict which I agree with ("if it doesn't fit you must acquit").
I just wondered if anyone has some theories about who the actual murderer was.
Here is one persons theory.
Charles Manson.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
