Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: where people are either too stupid to leave or too stuck to move
3,982 posts, read 6,687,625 times
Reputation: 3689
Advertisements
Maybe there is 2 killers because werent they killed around the same time both violently? To me it would take true strength and speed to kill two adults back to back and I assume one had to be screaming which may give a warning . I guess
The jury did not find OJ "innocent". They found him "not guilty". A "not guilty" verdict means only that the jury did not see sufficient evidence to convict. The prosecution bungled what should have been a slam dunk. Even one of the jurors later said he thought OJ was guilty but the evidence presented was insufficient.
O.J. Simpson is guilty. The jury in the murder trial did not think it was proven "beyond a reasonable doubt" because the police were so dodgy, but that does not mean we have to start combing the earth for other possible killers.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
