Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2015, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Western NY
732 posts, read 969,394 times
Reputation: 872

Advertisements

Lots made of what is better, housing quality, etc. Some things have declined since the 1960's.

Things that cost a lot more today and they are perhaps any of: worse in quality, or ease of utilizing, or getting just what you want from. So being forced to pay where you don't want to. This more today than past:

College - My parents paid mine, I pay my kids. These colleges have essentially professional sports, million dollar coaches - all of which I don't need or want, and certainly don't like paying for.

Health insurance and getting care - In the 60's see any doctor any time, was relatively low cost. Today hundreds of middlemen who question everything, produce statements that can't be understood showing columns of this minus this minus this. All means while medicine has advanced, we are paying for tons of paperwork today.

TV - well it is a better product, I like 10 to 20 of the 1000 channels I get versus the 3 or 4 that were good in the 1960's. But that 1000 channels you have to pay for all of them to get the 20 you want. Paying more to get more I guess but I do hope it is made more so we can get what we want and just pay for that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2015, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Metro Detroit
1,786 posts, read 2,668,283 times
Reputation: 3604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emigrations View Post
When people think of these "good old days," they often fail to remember that most of the rest of the world was severely damaged by WWII. We were really the "last man standing," and thus had competitive advantage. Also, go look at homes built in the 1940s-1960s. They are often TINY compared to middle class homes today, and frankly, often not that nice. Cars were one to a family - many women didn't drive. We certainly live much nicer than folks fifty years ago did.
I don't think we're comparing 1945 to 2015. Compare 1980 with 2015.

In 1980 a dual-earner household was wealthy.
In 2015 a dual-earner household is normal, and if uneducated, sometimes still unable to make it work.

In 1980 the median home cost $62,900
In 2015 the median home cost $292,000
An increase of 4.64x
(Source: http://www.census.gov/const/uspricemon.pdf )

Okay, so inflation is a thing. How did median incomes fair?

In 1980 the median personal income was $16,300
In 2015 the median household income is $51,900
An increase of 3.18x
(Go Google that if you want a source, I used multiple)

Let us also consider than in 1980, ~50% of women participated in the labour force. In 2015 it's more like 65%.
(Source: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2003/10/ressum3.pdf )

Oh! And medical expenses, Wow, let's not even go there.

So we have more people working to earn a wage that, when adjusted for inflation, is less and our #1 biggest expense, a house, has outpaced inflation by about 150%. That's an issue.

This doesn't have to do with what life was like in 1950, but rather 30 years later when the USSR was a super power again and Germany was just a couple years from reunification, England and France were back to their old selves and Japan was sending Hondas and Toyotas over here like nobody's business. America has really economically digressed since 1980, you can blame WW2 if you want (I guess? And while we're at it let's blame JFK for the 2008 recession.), but I think it's something else... and I think you know what that something else is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 09:35 AM
 
370 posts, read 446,875 times
Reputation: 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizzourah2006 View Post
It's lifestyle creep for most.

Think about a "middle class" family in the 60s. A 1.2k sq ft house, no AC, no cable, 1 television, ate almost all meals at home, had one car, vacations involved local trips like camping, going to the lake for a day, etc.

Today's middle class family: 2.5k sq ft house, house at a constant 70 degrees, cable, 3-4 TVs, eats most meals out, 2 new cars, 1-2 large vacations a year, 2+ cell phones, gym memberships, etc.

It's pretty easy to see how many families needed to almost double their income to maintain that middle class lifestyle.

Now this isn't the case for all, but it is for many.
How dare you say that people today are not entitled to live in MASSIVE HOMES, bigger than their parents, and have many new cars all while paying for it on one person's wages.

Oh and just for your information, we go on vacations to casino resorts and get room service the whole time!

HOW DARE YOU THINK THAT I AM NOT ENTITLED TO MY OWN GLUTTONY!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 09:41 AM
 
5,342 posts, read 6,167,667 times
Reputation: 4719
Quote:
Originally Posted by s1alker View Post
I remember in the 80s and early 90s you could work in union grocery stores making $18 bucks an hour to stock shelves. Now it's minimum wage, part time, no benefits. You could also work in warehouses around here making good union wages. These days it's just temp agency labor for minimum wage. It sucks that you basically have to pay for what is essentially another high school diploma to even have a tiny shot at making a living wage.

You still can. I know plenty of people that make 18-20/hr at grocery stores. Problem is the way it gets remembered is those wages are easy to get. The people that I know that have those wages have worked there for 15 years+. I worked for a union grocery store from 98-2006. I started at $5.15/hr ended at $9.55/hr. Not exactly crushing it for 8 years of work. I will concede that I only worked part time, but the people that I know that were full time were at around 10-10.50/he after about 4-5 years, not bad in the early 2000s for an. Hourly grocery job. Nobody was ever walking into an $18/hr job stocking shelves in the 80s or 90s. There are hourly's at Walmart that have been there 15 years + that make $18-20/hr too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
19,480 posts, read 25,153,902 times
Reputation: 51118
Quote:
Originally Posted by GER308 View Post
Did we really have so much less back then? I was Born in the mid 60´s in a middle class maybe towards upper middle class home in San Diego. We had a huge house and yard 2 TV´s, Phone, 1 Station wagen, 1 VW Camping bus, dirt bikes, pretty much anything we wanted as Kids... went out to eat and although my parents were terrrible with money they still saved.

What more do People have today, People have smartphones- I pay my daughters for 25 per month including buying the phone with national flat and Internet. I get mine from work. We don´t have a landline. Cable tv and internet-20 per month. A Laptop I get from work, Gym 20 per month. It is reallly not that much.

I remember friends of my older brother making 20$+ an hour doing construction in the 70's buying new cars, trucks ,motorcycles, drugs, and anything else they wanted while building homes.
Hmmm, what you called "middle class" or "upper middle class" is what we called wealthy in my area.

Middle class (even upper middle class) people did not (in my area) have two cars or two TVs, etc. A big house with a yard? Maybe in a bad neighborhood, or in a duplex or flat or sharing a house with grandparents.

Go out to eat? The first time that I ever ate in a restaurant was when I was 11 years old and I went with my best friend and her family to celebrate her birthday. And my family was considered middle class in my area. Middle class people, in my area, only went out to eat for very special occasions such as an anniversary or Mother's Day or someone's birthday.

No matter what you think, IMHO you did not grow up "middle class".

Last edited by germaine2626; 06-26-2015 at 10:38 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:19 AM
 
2,669 posts, read 2,092,040 times
Reputation: 3690
I think these are the major reasons that made life in the US so much more expensive:

1) Housing prices, especially in the more densely populated coastal areas. The house prices in the NYC metro area within probably one to one and a half hour commutte to Manhattan are probably back to 80% of where they were before the crash.

2) Health Insurance costs. I would guess that they cost at least 10 times as in the sixties. The Insurance with low dedecutibles that is accepted by most doctors is now unrealistically expensive. We pay roughly $700 a month for a family of three.

3) Cars are really expensive to own and maintain. A lot of the passenger trains and light rail where dismantled in the 60th and 70th to give way to highways. As a result, an average family now usually needs to buy and maintain two cars. When the cost of gas goes up, driving really becomes expensive.

4) Food and eating out. A lot of Americans stopped cooking and either eat out or get take out food. This really increased the expense and made everyone less healthy. And this change resulted in increased costs. For example, let's say a family with two working parents spends on avarage at least $25 a day for food. That translates to $500 a month or $600 a year.

I think all the other expenses on new technology, etc are not as significant as the four categories I described above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:23 AM
 
10,075 posts, read 7,542,084 times
Reputation: 15501
Quote:
In 1980 a dual-earner household was wealthy.
In 2015 a dual-earner household is normal
They are still wealthy... having it be normal isn't bad either, there are just enough wealthy to make it seem normal that everyone has extra money...

If you said that two incomes are poor than it is different, but that isn't the case
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:24 AM
 
Location: North West Arkansas (zone 6b)
2,776 posts, read 3,248,821 times
Reputation: 3913
we struggled on 2 incomes and figured out that the cost of living in NY/NJ was just not possible for us so we sold our house and bought something smaller in the middle of the country. Now we're living on my wife's salary using prepaid cell phones, no cable, slow internet, no satellite radio and driving older cars.

Life is so much better now and my kids will agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:31 AM
 
20,341 posts, read 19,930,346 times
Reputation: 13459
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeWilliams View Post
It's still possible to live on one income. It takes education now (or at least the ability to learn), along with being in the right geographic area.

Good reasons from Geo-Aggie (although conservatives will tell you it's all because of the liberals and their social programs).

One thing to keep in mind is that people spend a lot more of their income now on things that they did not ~30 years ago. Some examples: no cell phones or internet, not as prevalent cable TV, lesser chance of a house having air conditioning, less eating out, more households with only one car, kids played pick up games instead of organized (expensive) sports...
What you stated and I would add that smaller, 3 bedroom, 1 1/2 bath 1 maybe two-car garage homes were quite common. Also, one car or, at most, two car households. Cheaper vacations/so-called "staycations".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:53 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,396 posts, read 60,592,880 times
Reputation: 61012
We had 2 cars when I was little, one was listed as a farm vehicle, and tractors.

Until Mrs. NBP and I bought our house I hadn't lived in one with more than two bedrooms or one bathroom (that hasn't changed). She grew up in a 3 bedroom, 1 bath house.

We got cable in the mid-1960s and got 4 stations out of Pittsburgh. Without it we got 1 channel.

One phone until I ran a line into my mother's bedroom about 1990.

One TV until I ran a coax at the same time I did the phone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top