Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School in Grand Prairie, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 18
Address
 2030 PROCTOR DR
Grand Prairie, TX 75051
Telephone
(972) 262-7131
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.gpisd.org/ochoa
City-data.com school rating
18
Students
871
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
51.0
Free lunch eligible students
679
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
65
School district
GRAND PRAIRIE ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
SCHOOL FOR THE HIGHLY GIFTED (1.3 miles):

100
THURGOOD MARSHALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY (1.3 miles):

70
JAMES BOWIE EL (1.4 miles):

65
BARBARA BUSH EL (1.4 miles):

61
JOHN A DUBISKI CAREER H S (1.3 miles):

51
JUAN N SEGUIN EL (0.9 miles):

48
ADVANTAGE ACADEMY (0.5 miles):

37
YMLA AT JOHN F KENNEDY MIDDLE (0.8 miles):

33
Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School:

18
Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Dallas County:

53
Grand Prairie:

53
This School:

18

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 871
Enrollment in 2015: 873
Enrollment in 2014: 846
Enrollment in 2013: 603
Enrollment in 2012: 581
Enrollment in 2011: 583
Enrollment in 2010: 584
Enrollment in 2009: 574
Enrollment in 2008: 473
Enrollment in 2007: 488
Enrollment in 2006: 509
Enrollment in 2005: 461
Enrollment in 2004: 534
Enrollment in 2003: 553
Enrollment in 2002: 571
Enrollment in 2001: 660
Enrollment in 2000: 651
Enrollment in 1999: 645

Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students39140147138138146123871
Female students17696866586763408
Male students22717972807960463
American Indian/Alaska Native students - 2 - 11 - 15
Asian students - - - 111 - 3
Hispanic students3311311310710511197679
Black students5112214222318115
White students1131115710764
Two or More Races students - 11 - 21 - 5

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 39
Kindergarten enrollment: 140
1st grade enrollment: 147
2nd grade enrollment: 138
3rd grade enrollment: 138
4th grade enrollment: 146
5th grade enrollment: 123

Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 408 (46.8%)
School:

46.8%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 463 (53.2%)
Here:

53.2%
Texas:

50.1%

Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 5 (0.6%)
Here:

0.6%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 3 (0.3%)
School:

0.3%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 679 (78.0%)
School:

78.0%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 115 (13.2%)
School:

13.2%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 64 (7.3%)
Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School:

7.3%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 5 (0.6%)
Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School:

0.6%
Texas:

2.1%

Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 744 (85.4%)
School:

85.4%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 679 (78.0%)
Here:

78.0%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 65 (7.5%)
School:

7.5%
Texas:

6.2%

Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 51

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 14
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE school counselors: 2
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 14
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 0.3
Number of FTE security guards: 0.1
Number of FTE nurses: 1
Number of FTE psychologists: 0.3

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

17.1
State:

15.6

Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $3,163,909
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 51 (Salary Expenditures: $2,511,383)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5.8 (Salary Expenditures: $99,363)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 9 (Salary Expenditures: $279,841)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $268,922)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $53,626
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,543,897
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,734,465
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7.8 (Salary Expenditures: $146,186)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6.9 (Salary Expenditures: $389,924)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $268,922)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $75,658

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic391
  • Asian4
  • Black4
  • White4
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA22
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 405 (male: 211, female: 194)
  • Hispanic: 391 (male: 203, female: 188)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 22 (male: 14, female: 8)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 51 (male: 35, female: 16)
  • Hispanic: 44 (male: 28, female: 16)
  • Black: 7 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 26 (male: 16, female: 10)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic31
  • Black7
  • White7
  • Multirace2
  • LEP10
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 47 (male: 30, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 31 (male: 20, female: 11)
  • Black: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

1.4%
State:

5.2%

    Total number of students retained in 1st grade

  • Hispanic4
  • White2
  • LEP4
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all female)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Here:

4.1%
Texas:

6.1%
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School:

1.4%
Texas:

4.1%
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School:

1.6%
Texas:

4.3%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic19
  • White4
  • Multirace2
  • LEP10
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 25 (male: 18, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

28.7
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,408
  • Males1,403
  • Females1,414
  • Hispanic1,409
  • Black1,367
  • White1,492
Math Average Scale Score:

1,408
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 135
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 135

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.9 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

36%
37%
15%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,403, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 13%)
42%
31%
14%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,414, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 11%)
30%
43%
16%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,409, Tested: 116, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 10%)
35%
38%
17%
10%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,367, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 14%)
50%
29%
7%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 40%)
20%
40%
40%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,400
  • Males1,374
  • Females1,422
  • Hispanic1,405
  • Black1,353
  • White1,477
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,400
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 71
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 71

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.9 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

34%
31%
17%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,374, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 15%)
36%
37%
12%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,422, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 21%)
32%
26%
21%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,405, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 19%)
33%
29%
19%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,353, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 14%)
50%
36%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%
3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,330
  • Males1,303
  • Females1,372
  • Hispanic1,330
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,330
Texas:

956
Reading students tested: 65
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 65

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.1 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

46%
28%
14%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,303, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 8%)
54%
23%
15%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,372, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 19%)
35%
34%
12%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,330, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 12%)
46%
28%
14%
12%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,522
  • Males1,538
  • Females1,507
  • Hispanic1,512
  • Black1,573
  • White1,572
Math Average Scale Score:

1,522
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 135
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 135

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.8 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

32%
34%
23%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 15%)
31%
26%
28%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,507, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 7%)
33%
41%
19%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,512, Tested: 107, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 10%)
36%
32%
22%
10%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,573, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
14%
43%
29%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 18%)
9%
36%
37%
18%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,502
  • Males1,515
  • Females1,489
  • Hispanic1,488
  • Black1,560
  • White1,529
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,502
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 100
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 100

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.2 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

26%
32%
21%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,515, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 29%)
25%
29%
17%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
27%
35%
25%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,488, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 18%)
30%
32%
20%
18%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 36%)
7%
29%
28%
36%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,529, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,531
  • Males3,648
  • Females3,429
  • Hispanic3,463
  • Black3,708
  • White3,850
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,531
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 95
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 95

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.8 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

58%
23%
13%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,648, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 11%)
50%
23%
16%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,429, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 65%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 2%)
65%
23%
10%
2%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,463, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 65%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 6%)
65%
17%
12%
6%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,708, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 7%)
36%
35%
22%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,850, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 10%)
30%
50%
10%
10%
4th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 4
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 4

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,387
  • Males1,372
  • Females1,400
  • Hispanic1,389
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,387
Texas:

815
Reading students tested: 39
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.9 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.9 (46%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 5%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

56%
31%
5%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,372, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 61%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 6%)
61%
22%
11%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,400, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 10%)
52%
38%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,389, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 8%)
55%
32%
5%
8%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,244
  • Males3,188
  • Females3,300
  • Hispanic3,255
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,244
State:

2,017
Writing students tested: 44
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 44

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.3 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.4 (46%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 66%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

66%
23%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,188, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 68%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 0%)
68%
27%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,300, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 64%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
64%
18%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,255, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 65%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 0%)
65%
23%
12%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,601
  • Males1,599
  • Females1,603
  • Hispanic1,607
  • Black1,584
Math Average Scale Score:

1,601
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 121
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 121

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.3 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

21%
32%
26%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 24%)
22%
29%
25%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 17%)
19%
36%
28%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 100, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 24%)
19%
30%
27%
24%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 7%)
20%
47%
26%
7%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,554
  • Males1,538
  • Females1,579
  • Hispanic1,562
  • Black1,527
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,554
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 102
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 102

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

29%
26%
25%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 18%)
35%
31%
16%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 23%)
20%
17%
40%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,562, Tested: 81, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 20%)
27%
24%
29%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,527, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 20%)
40%
27%
13%
20%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,813
  • Males3,837
  • Females3,782
  • Hispanic3,813
  • Black3,755
Science Average Scale Score:

3,813
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 119
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 119

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.1 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 50%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

19%
50%
19%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,837, Tested: 67, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 16%)
22%
47%
15%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,782, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 6%)
15%
54%
25%
6%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,813, Tested: 99, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 12%)
20%
48%
20%
12%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,755, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 65%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 7%)
14%
65%
14%
7%
5th Grade (Spanish)
Math Average Scale Score:

1,519
Texas:

298
Math students tested: 5
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 5

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.6 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.4 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2 (50%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

40%
40%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,519, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,514
  • Males1,505
  • Females1,521
  • Hispanic1,514
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,514
Texas:

683
Reading students tested: 24
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.5 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.6 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

33%
38%
16%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,505, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 20%)
40%
30%
10%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,521, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 7%)
29%
42%
22%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,514, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 13%)
33%
38%
16%
13%
Science Average Scale Score:

3,285
State:

857
Science students tested: 8
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 8

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.6 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.1 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.8 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

63%
38%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,285, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
63%
38%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic52
  • Black7
  • White5
  • Multirace2
  • LEP16
  • IDEA7
  • 5047
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 66 (male: 27, female: 39)
  • Hispanic: 52 (male: 20, female: 32)
  • Black: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 5 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Section 504: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

75.8
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Grand Prairie, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Grand Prairie main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Ellen Ochoa Stem Academy At Ben Miliam Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents