Lake Shore Annex School in Belle Glade, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

1102 W AVE A
Belle Glade, FL 33430

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Sago Palm Academy School (11.0 miles):

45
Pahokee Middle-Senior High School (9.8 miles):

37
Pahokee Elementary School (9.8 miles):

36
Crossroads Academy School (0.1 miles):

31
K Cunningham/Canal Point Elementary School (12.5 miles):

26
Lake Shore Middle School (0.5 miles):

17
Lakeside Academy School (0.8 miles):

12
Lake Shore Annex School:

0
Lake Shore Annex School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
Belle Glade:

25
Lake Shore Annex School:

0

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 993-4000 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 3101
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 993-4021
Principal: Derrick Hibler
The function/setting of the school: Alternative to Expulsion
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 84
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Lake_Shore_Annex_Transition

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

37%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

61%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

49%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

491
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

52%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

522
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 154 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

1%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

11%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

31%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

49%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

23%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

51%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

29%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

253
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

94%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

86%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

13%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

20%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

58%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

51%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

48%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

284
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

94%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: NO

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

20%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

15%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

90%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

57%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

298
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

85%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1358
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1495
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1518
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1418
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

8%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1567
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

72%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

3%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

3%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

10
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1603
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

71%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

4%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

4%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1450
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

212
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

4%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

96%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

225
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

73%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

226
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

91%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

9%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1538
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

89%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1571
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

6%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1576
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1418
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

214
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

86%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

64%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

1693
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

56%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

4%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

326
Percent Passing
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

28%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

52%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

16%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1328
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1530
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1605
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1454
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1602
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1554
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

1492
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

185
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 97%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

221
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1534
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

351
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1555
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1654
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1567
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1652
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1768
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1746
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 103
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 32
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 54
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 37%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1352
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1604
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1581
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

298
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1343
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1587
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

1579
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1552
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

206
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 96%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

1485
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1586
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1665
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1602
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

247
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1777
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

99
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

626
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

94
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

102
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

67
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

11
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

616
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

13
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

5
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

20
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

630
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

17
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

51
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

23
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

18
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

11
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

8
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

4
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 93
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

298
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 66%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 29
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

218
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 66%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 37
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

221
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 3%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 38%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

1448
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 65%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1533
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1423
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 110

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1591
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1564
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1534
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 30

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

213
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

1585
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

256
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 65%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1594
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1445
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 149

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

1691
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1677
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

1610
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 67

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale Score
Here:

639
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 29
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48
Mean Scale Score
LAKE SHORE ANNEX:

645
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 25
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 40
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 48
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 42
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 52
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

219
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 6%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 63%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 40%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Belle Glade, FL
  5. Lake Shore Annex School in Belle Glade, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.