Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School in North Las Vegas, Nevada (NV) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 59.

Address:

3409 Deer Springs Way
North Las Vegas, NV 89084

Principal: Jefferey A. Hybarger
Phone Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-1770
Fax Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-1721
Website: goynes.ccsd.net
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: Adequate

Special Programs:
Homework Help Centers: No

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Advanced Technologies Academy (6.9 miles):	100
Ruthe Deskin Elementary School (3.8 miles):	73
Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School:	59
Virtual High School Distance Education (13.0 miles):	53
O. K. Adcock Elementary School (7.8 miles):	39
Oran K. Gragson Elementary School (10.1 miles):	27
Whitney Elementary School (15.8 miles):	17
Cheyenne High School (3.8 miles):	9
Jeffrey Behavior Junior/Senior High School (5.9 miles):	0

Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Nevada:	43
Clark County:	41
North Las Vegas:	29
This School:	59

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Adequate Yearly Progress

English Language Arts

School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate

Participation

All Students:	100.0%
Asian:	100.0%
Hispanic:	100.0%
Black:	100.0%
White:	100.0%
Two or more Races:	100.0%
Individual Education Plan Students:	100.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students:	100.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	100.0%

Percent Proficient

Asian:	95.6%
Two or more Races:	86.5%
White:	84.4%
All Students:	77.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students:	71.7%
Hispanic:	69.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	68.2%
Individual Education Plan Students:	58.5%

Math

School Math AYP Designation: Adequate

Participation

All Students:	100.0%
Asian:	100.0%
Hispanic:	100.0%
Black:	100.0%
White:	100.0%
Two or more Races:	100.0%
Individual Education Plan Students:	100.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students:	100.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	100.0%

Percent Proficient

Asian:	88.9%
Two or more Races:	76.0%
White:	72.8%
All Students:	69.7%
Hispanic:	63.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students:	59.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	58.8%
Individual Education Plan Students:	43.9%

Average Daily Attendance

School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate

Pacific Islander:	98.3%
Asian:	97.5%
Two or more Races:	96.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students:	96.2%
All Students:	95.9%
White:	95.7%
Hispanic:	95.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	95.5%
American Indian:	95.3%
Black:	95.2%
Individual Education Plan Students:	95.2%

Discuss this school with others on our active Nevada Forum

Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 3

Students Tested: 151

Here:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.8%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	7.3%
State:	10.3%

Approaches Standard

Here:	21.9%
Nevada:	20.3%

Meets Standard

This School:	38.4%
Nevada:	31.9%

Exceeds Standard

Here:	32.5%
State:	37.5%

Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	5.0%
State:	3.5%

Male

Here:	7.9%
State:	3.8%

Female

Here:	1.3%
Nevada:	3.2%

Asian

This School:	24.1%
State:	17.9%

Hispanic

Here:	-13.0%
Nevada:	-2.7%

Black

This School:	-27.8%
State:	-16.7%

White

This School:	20.6%
State:	13.5%

Two or more Races

This School:	15.1%
Nevada:	6.8%

Individual Education Plan Students

Here:	-29.5%
Nevada:	-23.7%

Limited English Proficiency Students

This School:	-9.6%
Nevada:	-5.4%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

Here:	-4.2%
State:	-4.6%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	151	5.0%	3.5%	7.3%	10.3%	21.9%	20.3%	38.4%	31.9%	32.5%	37.5%
Male	84	7.9%	3.8%	6.0%	11.1%	20.2%	19.2%	39.3%	30.7%	34.5%	39.0%
Female	67	1.3%	3.2%	9.0%	9.5%	23.9%	21.5%	37.3%	33.1%	29.9%	36.0%
Asian	20	24.1%	17.9%	0.0%	3.5%	10.0%	12.8%	35.0%	27.6%	55.0%	56.2%
Hispanic	34	-13.0%	-2.7%	11.8%	12.5%	35.3%	24.3%	35.3%	33.0%	17.7%	30.2%
Black	21	-27.8%	-16.7%	28.6%	21.7%	33.3%	29.1%	19.1%	30.6%	19.1%	18.6%
White	52	20.6%	13.5%	0.0%	6.0%	13.5%	14.6%	50.0%	31.5%	36.5%	47.8%
Two or more Races	21	15.1%	6.8%	4.8%	8.0%	14.3%	19.2%	38.1%	31.7%	42.9%	41.1%
Individual Education Plan Students	11	-29.5%	-23.7%	18.2%	30.4%	45.5%	27.4%	36.4%	23.4%	0.0%	18.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students	16	-9.6%	-5.4%	18.8%	13.8%	25.0%	25.8%	37.5%	32.0%	18.8%	28.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	47	-4.2%	-4.6%	6.4%	13.9%	31.9%	24.8%	36.2%	32.6%	25.5%	28.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	203	3.6%	0.4%	9.4%	11.5%	21.2%	22.2%	35.5%	34.9%	34.0%	31.4%
Male	115	0.2%	0.7%	10.4%	11.6%	23.5%	21.7%	31.3%	33.9%	34.8%	32.8%
Female	88	8.0%	0.1%	8.0%	11.3%	18.2%	22.7%	40.9%	35.9%	33.0%	30.0%
Asian	24	4.9%	13.3%	4.2%	5.7%	25.0%	15.1%	29.2%	32.5%	41.7%	46.6%
Hispanic	51	6.6%	-6.3%	7.8%	14.1%	19.6%	26.4%	39.2%	35.7%	33.3%	23.9%
Black	36	-18.7%	-17.1%	19.4%	22.8%	33.3%	28.4%	30.6%	30.3%	16.7%	18.4%
White	89	9.4%	9.8%	7.9%	6.9%	16.9%	17.5%	36.0%	35.9%	39.3%	39.8%
Individual Education Plan Students	11	-20.4%	-27.5%	27.3%	32.5%	27.3%	29.1%	18.2%	23.6%	27.3%	14.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students	20	-10.9%	-10.5%	15.0%	15.8%	30.0%	28.7%	35.0%	35.5%	20.0%	19.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	56	-15.9%	-8.4%	17.9%	15.5%	32.1%	26.9%	33.9%	34.5%	16.1%	23.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	201	5.9%	4.2%	8.5%	6.5%	29.4%	33.0%	31.3%	31.3%	30.8%	29.2%
Male	106	11.6%	6.0%	8.5%	6.6%	23.6%	31.0%	34.9%	31.3%	33.0%	31.1%
Female	95	-0.5%	2.2%	8.4%	6.4%	35.8%	35.1%	27.4%	31.3%	28.4%	27.2%
Asian	31	30.8%	17.1%	3.2%	3.4%	9.7%	23.2%	41.9%	32.7%	45.2%	40.7%
Hispanic	44	-4.0%	-4.0%	13.6%	8.1%	34.1%	39.6%	27.3%	30.3%	25.0%	22.0%
Black	37	-13.1%	-13.0%	16.2%	12.6%	40.5%	44.1%	27.0%	26.5%	16.2%	16.7%
White	89	10.0%	14.7%	4.5%	3.7%	29.2%	25.3%	31.5%	33.2%	34.8%	37.8%
Individual Education Plan Students	13	-33.2%	-22.6%	46.2%	22.2%	30.8%	44.1%	7.7%	20.6%	15.4%	13.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students	31	-4.7%	-8.6%	19.4%	9.2%	29.0%	43.1%	29.0%	29.8%	22.6%	17.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	43	-12.1%	-5.3%	18.6%	9.2%	37.2%	39.8%	25.6%	29.9%	18.6%	21.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	204	3.0%	3.6%	12.7%	8.3%	27.9%	31.7%	34.8%	35.6%	24.5%	24.4%
Male	108	5.7%	4.0%	12.0%	8.6%	25.9%	31.1%	39.8%	34.8%	22.2%	25.4%
Female	96	-0.1%	3.3%	13.5%	8.0%	30.2%	32.4%	29.2%	36.3%	27.1%	23.2%
Asian	25	7.7%	17.3%	8.0%	3.9%	28.0%	22.5%	36.0%	36.4%	28.0%	37.2%
Hispanic	44	-15.4%	-5.3%	22.7%	10.4%	36.4%	38.6%	18.2%	34.5%	22.7%	16.5%
Black	33	-23.0%	-11.7%	33.3%	16.3%	33.3%	39.1%	27.3%	31.4%	6.1%	13.2%
White	102	18.2%	13.8%	2.9%	5.0%	22.5%	24.9%	44.1%	37.5%	30.4%	32.6%
Individual Education Plan Students	18	-39.6%	-23.5%	44.4%	25.9%	38.9%	41.3%	11.1%	21.9%	5.6%	11.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students	20	-31.3%	-9.2%	30.0%	12.0%	45.0%	41.0%	15.0%	33.6%	10.0%	13.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	44	-4.0%	-6.7%	15.9%	12.0%	31.8%	38.4%	31.8%	33.6%	20.5%	16.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	180	14.6%	12.4%	9.0%	8.8%	33.1%	35.5%	40.4%	33.7%	17.4%	22.1%
Male	101	18.1%	13.0%	7.9%	9.6%	30.7%	34.2%	42.6%	32.6%	18.8%	23.7%
Female	79	9.9%	11.9%	10.4%	8.0%	36.4%	36.9%	37.7%	34.8%	15.6%	20.3%
Asian	25	36.7%	26.3%	8.0%	3.9%	12.0%	26.5%	52.0%	35.9%	28.0%	33.6%
Hispanic	42	-2.8%	3.1%	14.3%	11.3%	45.2%	42.3%	31.0%	31.6%	9.5%	14.8%
Black	25	-1.6%	-4.2%	20.8%	17.8%	37.5%	43.1%	25.0%	28.3%	16.7%	10.8%
White	87	21.8%	23.4%	3.5%	5.0%	31.4%	28.3%	46.5%	36.8%	18.6%	30.0%
Individual Education Plan Students	15	-3.3%	-12.3%	33.3%	25.8%	26.7%	43.1%	26.7%	19.4%	13.3%	11.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students	15	-10.0%	-3.5%	6.7%	13.7%	60.0%	46.6%	20.0%	28.4%	13.3%	11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	27	-8.7%	2.2%	23.1%	12.3%	42.3%	42.2%	23.1%	31.2%	11.5%	14.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	167	7.6%	5.1%	9.6%	10.8%	37.3%	38.7%	37.3%	32.2%	15.7%	18.3%
Male	92	8.4%	5.6%	8.8%	11.5%	37.4%	37.6%	38.5%	32.0%	15.4%	18.9%
Female	75	6.6%	4.7%	10.7%	10.1%	37.3%	39.8%	36.0%	32.4%	16.0%	17.7%
Asian	28	11.7%	18.9%	10.7%	5.7%	32.1%	30.0%	39.3%	36.8%	17.9%	27.5%
Hispanic	25	-5.4%	-6.7%	16.0%	14.5%	44.0%	46.8%	36.0%	27.8%	4.0%	10.9%
Black	29	-6.1%	-11.5%	7.1%	20.6%	53.6%	45.5%	35.7%	24.9%	3.6%	9.0%
White	81	16.3%	17.4%	8.6%	6.0%	29.6%	31.2%	38.3%	37.2%	23.5%	25.6%
Individual Education Plan Students	11	18.2%	-17.8%	18.2%	28.4%	18.2%	44.0%	54.5%	18.9%	9.1%	8.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students	10	-45.4%	-15.4%	10.0%	18.1%	90.0%	51.9%	0.0%	23.1%	0.0%	6.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	30	1.3%	-7.6%	13.3%	15.7%	40.0%	46.5%	40.0%	27.2%	6.7%	10.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 4

Students Tested: 158

Here:	100.0%
State:	99.8%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	2.5%
State:	7.2%

Approaches Standard

Here:	13.3%
Nevada:	23.3%

Meets Standard

This School:	55.1%
State:	55.4%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	29.1%
Nevada:	14.1%

Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	18.3%
State:	3.6%

Male

This School:	20.3%
Nevada:	3.2%

Female

Here:	15.8%
Nevada:	4.0%

Asian

Here:	34.1%
Nevada:	19.4%

Hispanic

This School:	16.3%
State:	-3.0%

Black

Here:	-10.3%
Nevada:	-14.3%

White

This School:	22.8%
Nevada:	12.5%

Two or more Races

Here:	21.6%
State:	9.6%

Individual Education Plan Students

Here:	0.8%
State:	-25.9%

Limited English Proficiency Students

Here:	19.1%
Nevada:	-5.3%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

Here:	5.8%
Nevada:	-4.5%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	158	18.3%	3.6%	2.5%	7.2%	13.3%	23.3%	55.1%	55.4%	29.1%	14.1%
Male	87	20.3%	3.2%	1.2%	7.7%	12.6%	23.3%	55.2%	55.0%	31.0%	14.1%
Female	71	15.8%	4.0%	4.2%	6.6%	14.1%	23.4%	54.9%	55.9%	26.8%	14.1%
Asian	14	34.1%	19.4%	0.0%	2.5%	0.0%	12.3%	85.7%	56.8%	14.3%	28.5%
Hispanic	45	16.3%	-3.0%	2.2%	8.8%	15.6%	28.2%	57.8%	53.9%	24.4%	9.0%
Black	18	-10.3%	-14.3%	5.6%	15.6%	38.9%	32.8%	55.6%	46.4%	0.0%	5.2%
White	62	22.8%	12.5%	3.2%	4.2%	8.1%	17.5%	51.6%	58.9%	37.1%	19.5%
Two or more Races	16	21.6%	9.6%	0.0%	5.4%	12.5%	19.2%	37.5%	57.6%	50.0%	17.9%
Individual Education Plan Students	15	0.8%	-25.9%	20.0%	24.5%	13.3%	35.4%	46.7%	35.3%	20.0%	4.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students	20	19.1%	-5.3%	0.0%	9.8%	15.0%	29.6%	60.0%	52.1%	25.0%	8.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	46	5.8%	-4.5%	6.5%	9.9%	21.7%	28.7%	56.5%	52.8%	15.2%	8.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	199	10.9%	0.5%	6.6%	8.0%	16.7%	25.6%	64.1%	57.5%	12.6%	8.9%
Male	100	13.1%	-0.3%	5.0%	8.5%	16.0%	25.9%	67.0%	56.2%	12.0%	9.5%
Female	99	8.6%	1.3%	8.2%	7.5%	17.3%	25.2%	61.2%	58.9%	13.3%	8.4%
Asian	32	27.9%	13.0%	3.1%	4.0%	3.1%	17.1%	78.1%	62.1%	15.6%	16.8%
Hispanic	47	2.2%	-6.8%	6.4%	9.6%	25.5%	31.3%	61.7%	53.9%	6.4%	5.2%
Black	41	-0.9%	-15.8%	17.5%	16.0%	17.5%	33.9%	62.5%	47.1%	2.5%	3.0%
White	79	15.1%	9.8%	2.5%	5.0%	16.5%	19.3%	60.8%	62.9%	20.3%	12.8%
Individual Education Plan Students	13	-27.4%	-30.1%	30.8%	26.0%	30.8%	38.2%	23.1%	32.9%	15.4%	2.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students	21	-8.8%	-17.1%	14.3%	13.1%	28.6%	38.2%	57.1%	46.5%	0.0%	2.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	61	-4.2%	-9.1%	15.0%	11.4%	23.3%	31.9%	51.7%	51.8%	10.0%	5.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	193	16.2%	8.0%	6.2%	8.1%	21.2%	27.6%	37.8%	32.4%	34.7%	31.9%
Male	96	14.5%	7.6%	6.3%	8.4%	22.9%	27.7%	37.5%	32.1%	33.3%	31.8%
Female	97	17.9%	8.3%	6.2%	7.8%	19.6%	27.6%	38.1%	32.7%	36.1%	32.0%
Asian	27	14.1%	23.2%	7.4%	3.4%	22.2%	17.1%	22.2%	32.2%	48.1%	47.3%
Hispanic	44	7.3%	0.0%	13.6%	10.3%	22.7%	33.4%	31.8%	32.4%	31.8%	23.9%
Black	29	-11.5%	-7.3%	13.8%	15.1%	41.4%	35.9%	24.1%	30.6%	20.7%	18.4%
White	93	29.7%	17.0%	0.0%	4.9%	14.0%	21.8%	49.5%	32.9%	36.6%	40.5%
Individual Education Plan Students	17	-21.0%	-22.2%	23.5%	27.9%	41.2%	38.1%	23.5%	22.2%	11.8%	11.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students	16	-6.3%	-9.5%	18.8%	13.9%	31.3%	39.3%	37.5%	30.4%	12.5%	16.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	51	6.4%	-1.7%	9.8%	11.4%	27.5%	34.0%	43.1%	31.7%	19.6%	22.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	169	7.6%	9.9%	7.1%	9.3%	29.0%	24.5%	42.0%	38.7%	21.9%	27.4%
Male	92	8.9%	9.5%	7.6%	10.2%	27.2%	24.0%	39.1%	38.1%	26.1%	27.7%
Female	77	6.0%	10.3%	6.5%	8.4%	31.2%	25.1%	45.5%	39.4%	16.9%	27.2%
Asian	20	18.7%	23.2%	5.0%	3.9%	20.0%	16.6%	30.0%	36.7%	45.0%	42.8%
Hispanic	42	-3.9%	2.1%	7.1%	11.8%	40.5%	29.8%	47.6%	38.8%	4.8%	19.6%
Black	34	-6.3%	-5.9%	20.6%	17.7%	29.4%	31.9%	32.4%	35.2%	17.6%	15.2%
White	73	17.7%	19.0%	1.4%	5.7%	24.7%	19.0%	46.6%	39.8%	27.4%	35.5%
Individual Education Plan Students	19	-8.9%	-19.7%	21.1%	30.0%	31.6%	33.5%	31.6%	25.6%	15.8%	11.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students	13	-2.5%	-7.4%	7.7%	15.4%	38.5%	35.7%	38.5%	36.2%	15.4%	12.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	44	-10.8%	-0.1%	20.5%	13.3%	34.1%	30.5%	31.8%	37.5%	13.6%	18.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	183	17.9%	21.0%	3.8%	9.9%	35.0%	25.8%	37.7%	35.6%	23.5%	28.7%
Male	102	27.3%	20.3%	2.9%	10.8%	26.5%	25.6%	43.1%	34.6%	27.5%	29.0%
Female	81	6.1%	21.8%	4.9%	8.9%	45.7%	26.0%	30.9%	36.7%	18.5%	28.4%
Asian	28	21.0%	34.9%	7.1%	4.7%	28.6%	17.1%	42.9%	34.8%	21.4%	43.4%
Hispanic	39	13.1%	11.5%	10.3%	13.4%	33.3%	31.8%	38.5%	35.0%	17.9%	19.7%
Black	35	-6.2%	4.6%	0.0%	18.6%	62.9%	33.5%	28.6%	31.8%	8.6%	16.1%
White	78	29.8%	31.5%	1.3%	5.3%	25.6%	19.8%	38.5%	37.3%	34.6%	37.5%
Individual Education Plan Students	17	-13.9%	-8.5%	17.6%	29.9%	52.9%	35.3%	11.8%	23.3%	17.6%	11.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	36	1.1%	10.4%	5.6%	14.5%	50.0%	31.8%	33.3%	34.8%	11.1%	18.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 5

Students Tested: 150

Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.9%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	14.0%
State:	16.4%

Approaches Standard

This School:	12.0%
State:	14.5%

Meets Standard

This School:	73.3%
State:	64.0%

Exceeds Standard

Here:	0.7%
State:	5.2%

Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	8.1%
Nevada:	3.3%

Male

This School:	12.4%
State:	1.9%

Female

This School:	4.5%
State:	4.8%

Hispanic

Here:	-2.5%
State:	-2.0%

Black

This School:	-10.3%
State:	-15.6%

White

Here:	10.9%
State:	11.0%

Two or more Races

Here:	23.6%
Nevada:	8.9%

Limited English Proficiency Students

Here:	0.8%
State:	-4.4%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

This School:	2.2%
State:	-4.5%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	150	8.1%	3.3%	14.0%	16.4%	12.0%	14.5%	73.3%	64.0%	0.7%	5.2%
Male	69	12.4%	1.9%	8.7%	17.3%	13.0%	14.9%	76.8%	62.4%	1.5%	5.4%
Female	81	4.5%	4.8%	18.5%	15.3%	11.1%	14.0%	70.4%	65.8%	0.0%	4.8%
Hispanic	41	-2.5%	-2.0%	19.5%	19.5%	17.1%	16.5%	63.4%	60.5%	0.0%	3.5%
Black	18	-10.3%	-15.6%	38.9%	31.1%	5.6%	18.7%	55.6%	48.9%	0.0%	1.4%
White	56	10.9%	11.0%	10.7%	10.7%	12.5%	12.3%	76.8%	70.0%	0.0%	6.9%
Two or more Races	19	23.6%	8.9%	0.0%	13.4%	10.5%	11.8%	89.5%	68.9%	0.0%	5.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students	15	0.8%	-4.4%	13.3%	21.7%	20.0%	16.8%	66.7%	58.1%	0.0%	3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	47	2.2%	-4.5%	21.3%	21.7%	10.6%	16.9%	68.1%	58.3%	0.0%	3.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	190	1.8%	0.6%	15.3%	16.2%	16.9%	17.3%	60.3%	60.4%	7.4%	6.1%
Male	94	2.9%	-0.6%	15.1%	17.3%	16.1%	17.4%	60.2%	59.0%	8.6%	6.3%
Female	96	0.8%	1.8%	15.6%	15.0%	17.7%	17.2%	60.4%	61.8%	6.3%	5.9%
Asian	28	-5.2%	14.4%	25.0%	8.0%	14.3%	11.7%	57.1%	67.9%	3.6%	12.4%
Hispanic	52	-9.0%	-6.2%	19.6%	19.9%	23.5%	20.5%	52.9%	56.3%	3.9%	3.4%
Black	25	-17.9%	-15.8%	32.0%	27.9%	20.0%	22.1%	48.0%	47.5%	0.0%	2.6%
White	85	16.5%	9.3%	4.7%	10.8%	12.9%	14.0%	69.4%	66.7%	12.9%	8.5%
Individual Education Plan Students	15	-32.6%	-33.4%	60.0%	45.6%	6.7%	21.9%	33.3%	31.1%	0.0%	1.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students	13	-35.1%	-22.7%	38.5%	31.1%	30.8%	25.7%	30.8%	42.1%	0.0%	1.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	58	-15.9%	-8.5%	27.6%	21.7%	22.4%	20.9%	48.3%	54.0%	1.7%	3.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	189	7.7%	5.9%	2.6%	4.0%	33.3%	33.8%	46.6%	45.7%	17.5%	16.5%
Male	105	8.5%	4.7%	2.9%	4.8%	32.4%	34.2%	47.6%	44.8%	17.1%	16.3%
Female	84	6.8%	7.1%	2.4%	3.3%	34.5%	33.3%	45.2%	46.6%	17.9%	16.8%
Asian	26	20.6%	19.8%	0.0%	1.7%	23.1%	22.3%	46.2%	47.8%	30.8%	28.2%
Hispanic	52	-2.5%	-2.7%	0.0%	5.3%	46.2%	41.1%	42.3%	42.4%	11.5%	11.2%
Black	39	0.1%	-10.7%	7.7%	8.5%	35.9%	45.9%	41.0%	38.0%	15.4%	7.6%
White	72	14.5%	16.0%	2.8%	2.1%	26.4%	25.5%	52.8%	50.4%	18.1%	21.9%
Individual Education Plan Students	23	-30.2%	-29.4%	17.4%	17.3%	56.5%	55.8%	26.1%	22.5%	0.0%	4.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students	10	-16.3%	-20.5%	0.0%	8.5%	60.0%	55.7%	30.0%	31.7%	10.0%	4.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	44	-4.0%	-4.5%	6.8%	5.8%	40.9%	42.5%	45.5%	41.2%	6.8%	10.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	180	-3.5%	5.3%	4.4%	5.9%	42.8%	32.5%	45.0%	48.4%	7.8%	13.2%
Male	107	-4.9%	4.4%	3.7%	6.6%	44.9%	32.6%	43.0%	47.6%	8.4%	13.1%
Female	73	-1.5%	6.2%	5.5%	5.1%	39.7%	32.5%	47.9%	49.3%	6.8%	13.2%
Asian	29	5.8%	19.0%	6.9%	2.6%	31.0%	22.2%	48.3%	51.8%	13.8%	23.4%
Hispanic	35	-10.6%	-3.9%	2.9%	7.7%	51.4%	39.9%	37.1%	44.3%	8.6%	8.2%
Black	43	-21.4%	-12.0%	7.0%	11.2%	58.1%	44.5%	30.2%	38.5%	4.7%	5.8%
White	72	6.2%	15.5%	2.8%	3.5%	34.7%	24.7%	55.6%	54.1%	6.9%	17.7%
Individual Education Plan Students	20	-46.3%	-30.4%	15.0%	23.7%	75.0%	50.4%	10.0%	22.5%	0.0%	3.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	41	-12.4%	-5.1%	4.9%	8.5%	51.2%	40.3%	43.9%	43.5%	0.0%	7.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	211	15.3%	15.1%	3.8%	6.7%	37.6%	34.8%	46.7%	46.9%	11.9%	11.6%
Male	98	10.8%	14.1%	6.1%	7.9%	39.8%	34.8%	45.9%	45.9%	8.2%	11.5%
Female	113	19.2%	16.3%	1.8%	5.5%	35.7%	34.9%	47.3%	47.9%	15.2%	11.7%
Asian	33	20.3%	29.6%	0.0%	3.4%	36.4%	23.7%	51.5%	53.0%	12.1%	19.9%
Hispanic	41	7.9%	4.8%	7.3%	9.0%	41.5%	42.9%	39.0%	41.4%	12.2%	6.7%
Black	42	-5.2%	-3.2%	7.1%	13.3%	54.8%	46.6%	35.7%	35.2%	2.4%	4.8%
White	93	26.3%	26.5%	2.2%	3.7%	28.3%	26.6%	53.3%	53.6%	16.3%	16.1%
Individual Education Plan Students	19	-32.2%	-19.8%	11.1%	24.8%	77.8%	51.8%	11.1%	20.8%	0.0%	2.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students	11	-16.0%	-15.8%	9.1%	16.3%	63.6%	56.2%	27.3%	25.7%	0.0%	1.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	34	0.8%	3.3%	8.8%	9.8%	47.1%	43.6%	35.3%	40.4%	8.8%	6.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	156	23.4%	9.3%	7.8%	8.2%	23.4%	37.2%	49.4%	41.5%	19.5%	13.2%
Male	78	24.7%	7.9%	7.8%	9.2%	22.1%	37.6%	57.1%	40.9%	13.0%	12.4%
Female	78	22.1%	10.7%	7.8%	7.2%	24.7%	36.7%	41.6%	42.0%	26.0%	14.1%
Asian	24	36.4%	24.4%	4.5%	3.5%	13.6%	26.7%	59.1%	47.2%	22.7%	22.6%
Hispanic	20	4.6%	-2.0%	10.0%	10.6%	40.0%	46.0%	40.0%	36.1%	10.0%	7.3%
Black	30	14.6%	-9.6%	10.0%	16.4%	30.0%	47.7%	43.3%	30.5%	16.7%	5.3%
White	79	28.0%	20.8%	6.3%	5.0%	20.3%	28.9%	51.9%	47.7%	21.5%	18.5%
Individual Education Plan Students	16	-1.6%	-24.6%	18.8%	29.6%	37.5%	49.6%	37.5%	18.1%	6.3%	2.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	26	8.4%	-4.3%	19.2%	12.2%	26.9%	46.7%	42.3%	34.5%	11.5%	6.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 3

Students Tested: 151

Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.8%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	10.6%
Nevada:	21.5%

Approaches Standard

This School:	21.9%
State:	20.2%

Meets Standard

Here:	45.0%
State:	32.6%

Exceeds Standard

Here:	22.5%
State:	25.7%

Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	3.7%
Nevada:	-5.5%

Male

This School:	2.9%
State:	-8.6%

Female

This School:	4.9%
Nevada:	-2.3%

Asian

Here:	26.2%
Nevada:	10.7%

Hispanic

Here:	-5.0%
State:	-16.6%

Black

This School:	-1.9%
State:	-22.0%

White

This School:	3.5%
Nevada:	7.9%

Two or more Races

Here:	7.6%
State:	3.4%

Individual Education Plan Students

Here:	-54.7%
State:	-53.7%

Limited English Proficiency Students

Here:	-13.8%
State:	-22.3%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

This School:	-4.2%
State:	-16.9%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	151	3.7%	-5.5%	10.6%	21.5%	21.9%	20.2%	45.0%	32.6%	22.5%	25.7%
Male	84	2.9%	-8.6%	11.9%	24.2%	21.4%	20.6%	47.6%	31.8%	19.1%	23.4%
Female	67	4.9%	-2.3%	9.0%	18.7%	22.4%	19.8%	41.8%	33.5%	26.9%	28.0%
Asian	20	26.2%	10.7%	5.0%	10.4%	5.0%	15.1%	60.0%	33.9%	30.0%	40.6%
Hispanic	34	-5.0%	-16.6%	20.6%	28.9%	20.6%	23.9%	38.2%	30.8%	20.6%	16.4%
Black	21	-1.9%	-22.0%	23.8%	33.7%	14.3%	24.4%	57.1%	28.5%	4.8%	13.4%
White	52	3.5%	7.9%	1.9%	12.6%	30.8%	15.7%	38.5%	35.2%	28.9%	36.6%
Two or more Races	21	7.6%	3.4%	0.0%	14.4%	28.6%	18.4%	47.6%	35.4%	23.8%	31.9%
Individual Education Plan Students	11	-54.7%	-53.7%	36.4%	73.8%	54.6%	16.1%	9.1%	7.1%	0.0%	3.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students	16	-13.8%	-22.3%	31.3%	33.5%	18.8%	25.0%	25.0%	29.0%	25.0%	12.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	47	-4.2%	-16.9%	12.8%	29.2%	27.7%	23.8%	53.2%	30.8%	6.4%	16.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 4

Students Tested: 158

Here:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.9%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	5.7%
Nevada:	15.9%

Approaches Standard

This School:	14.6%
State:	19.3%

Meets Standard

This School:	43.0%
State:	46.3%

Exceeds Standard

Here:	36.7%
Nevada:	18.5%

Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	13.9%
State:	-1.1%

Male

Here:	8.8%
Nevada:	-5.4%

Female

Here:	20.0%
Nevada:	3.4%

Asian

Here:	19.8%
Nevada:	13.5%

Hispanic

This School:	9.7%
State:	-10.8%

Black

Here:	-4.8%
Nevada:	-18.2%

White

This School:	19.6%
Nevada:	10.9%

Two or more Races

This School:	15.4%
Nevada:	7.9%

Individual Education Plan Students

Here:	-25.9%
State:	-38.7%

Limited English Proficiency Students

This School:	9.1%
State:	-16.6%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

Here:	-2.8%
State:	-11.4%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	158	13.9%	-1.1%	5.7%	15.9%	14.6%	19.3%	43.0%	46.3%	36.7%	18.5%
Male	87	8.8%	-5.4%	4.6%	19.0%	20.7%	20.5%	44.8%	44.7%	29.9%	15.9%
Female	71	20.0%	3.4%	7.0%	12.7%	7.0%	18.0%	40.9%	48.0%	45.1%	21.3%
Asian	14	19.8%	13.5%	0.0%	7.4%	14.3%	13.2%	35.7%	52.0%	50.0%	27.4%
Hispanic	45	9.7%	-10.8%	11.1%	21.5%	13.3%	23.4%	46.7%	43.4%	28.9%	11.7%
Black	18	-4.8%	-18.2%	5.6%	26.0%	33.3%	26.3%	50.0%	38.5%	11.1%	9.2%
White	62	19.6%	10.9%	4.8%	9.1%	9.7%	14.1%	41.9%	50.0%	43.6%	26.8%
Two or more Races	16	15.4%	7.9%	0.0%	10.5%	18.8%	15.7%	31.3%	49.5%	50.0%	24.3%
Individual Education Plan Students	15	-25.9%	-38.7%	40.0%	53.1%	20.0%	19.7%	26.7%	21.6%	13.3%	5.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students	20	9.1%	-16.6%	15.0%	25.4%	10.0%	25.3%	50.0%	40.0%	25.0%	9.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	46	-2.8%	-11.4%	15.2%	21.7%	21.7%	23.8%	43.5%	43.1%	19.6%	11.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 5

Students Tested: 150

This School:	100.0%
State:	99.9%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

Here:	6.7%
State:	17.2%

Approaches Standard

This School:	18.0%
Nevada:	20.1%

Meets Standard

Here:	46.7%
Nevada:	38.9%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	28.7%
State:	23.8%

Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	9.4%
Nevada:	-3.2%

Male

Here:	10.9%
Nevada:	-7.4%

Female

Here:	8.2%
Nevada:	1.2%

Asian

Here:	34.1%
State:	8.9%

Hispanic

This School:	2.4%
State:	-13.3%

Black

Here:	-21.4%
Nevada:	-20.3%

White

Here:	10.9%
Nevada:	9.3%

Two or more Races

Here:	34.1%
Nevada:	5.0%

Limited English Proficiency Students

Here:	0.8%
State:	-19.8%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

This School:	-2.1%
State:	-14.0%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	150	9.4%	-3.2%	6.7%	17.2%	18.0%	20.1%	46.7%	38.9%	28.7%	23.8%
Male	69	10.9%	-7.4%	8.7%	20.7%	14.5%	20.7%	42.0%	37.3%	34.8%	21.2%
Female	81	8.2%	1.2%	4.9%	13.5%	21.0%	19.4%	50.6%	40.5%	23.5%	26.6%
Asian	13	34.1%	8.9%	0.0%	9.6%	0.0%	15.6%	84.6%	42.5%	15.4%	32.3%
Hispanic	41	2.4%	-13.3%	9.8%	22.8%	22.0%	24.6%	43.9%	37.2%	24.4%	15.5%
Black	18	-21.4%	-20.3%	11.1%	28.2%	44.4%	26.2%	27.8%	33.3%	16.7%	12.3%
White	56	10.9%	9.3%	7.1%	10.1%	16.1%	14.7%	39.3%	41.1%	37.5%	34.1%
Two or more Races	19	34.1%	5.0%	0.0%	12.3%	0.0%	16.8%	68.4%	41.4%	31.6%	29.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students	15	0.8%	-19.8%	13.3%	27.4%	20.0%	26.5%	60.0%	34.7%	6.7%	11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	47	-2.1%	-14.0%	6.4%	23.4%	29.8%	24.7%	40.4%	37.1%	23.4%	14.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

Nevada Writing Examination Grade 5

Students Tested: 142

This School:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.9%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	5.1%
Nevada:	7.3%

Approaches Standard

This School:	46.4%
Nevada:	47.5%

Meets Standard

Here:	47.1%
State:	40.7%

Exceeds Standard

Here:	1.5%
Nevada:	4.5%

Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

This School:	-15.3%
Nevada:	-18.6%

Male

This School:	-19.2%
Nevada:	-26.3%

Female

Here:	-11.7%
State:	-10.3%

Hispanic

This School:	-23.8%
State:	-27.2%

Black

Here:	-26.3%
State:	-27.0%

White

This School:	-11.0%
State:	-10.3%

Two or more Races

This School:	-16.7%
Nevada:	-11.7%

Limited English Proficiency Students

Here:	-30.5%
Nevada:	-31.2%

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students

This School:	-20.6%
State:	-28.2%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	142	-15.3%	-18.6%	5.1%	7.3%	46.4%	47.5%	47.1%	40.7%	1.5%	4.5%
Male	67	-19.2%	-26.3%	9.2%	10.2%	46.2%	52.3%	44.6%	34.5%	0.0%	3.0%
Female	75	-11.7%	-10.3%	1.4%	4.2%	46.6%	42.3%	49.3%	47.3%	2.7%	6.2%
Hispanic	40	-23.8%	-27.2%	10.0%	9.3%	50.0%	54.0%	37.5%	34.3%	2.5%	2.3%
Black	17	-26.3%	-27.0%	6.3%	10.2%	56.3%	53.0%	37.5%	34.4%	0.0%	2.4%
White	55	-11.0%	-10.3%	3.8%	5.2%	43.4%	41.3%	50.9%	47.0%	1.9%	6.5%
Two or more Races	18	-16.7%	-11.7%	0.0%	6.1%	52.9%	41.8%	47.1%	46.2%	0.0%	5.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students	12	-30.5%	-31.2%	8.3%	10.9%	58.3%	56.6%	33.3%	30.6%	0.0%	2.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	44	-20.6%	-28.2%	6.8%	10.2%	50.0%	54.2%	43.2%	33.4%	0.0%	2.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 4

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	168	16.1%	23.0%	23.2%	25.4%	22.6%	25.9%	38.1%	25.7%
Male	91	17.6%	27.8%	22.0%	26.6%	27.5%	24.3%	33.0%	21.3%
Female	77	14.3%	18.0%	24.7%	24.2%	16.9%	27.5%	44.2%	30.3%
Asian	19	0.0%	10.0%	26.3%	18.1%	21.1%	27.0%	52.6%	44.9%
Black	34	29.4%	33.3%	29.4%	26.8%	14.7%	22.5%	26.5%	17.3%
White	73	13.7%	14.6%	13.7%	21.5%	27.4%	27.9%	45.2%	36.0%
Individual Education Plan Students	20	30.0%	53.8%	40.0%	23.9%	5.0%	13.1%	25.0%	9.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students	13	15.4%	42.6%	46.2%	33.4%	7.7%	18.1%	30.8%	5.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	43	30.2%	33.1%	32.6%	29.8%	11.6%	23.3%	25.6%	13.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 4

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	168	18.6%	20.6%	25.7%	24.2%	24.6%	27.9%	31.1%	27.3%
Male	91	16.5%	21.9%	26.4%	23.0%	23.1%	26.4%	34.1%	28.7%
Female	77	21.1%	19.2%	25.0%	25.4%	26.3%	29.6%	27.6%	25.8%
Asian	19	10.5%	10.1%	10.5%	18.9%	26.3%	28.9%	52.6%	42.2%
Black	34	36.4%	34.3%	27.3%	27.1%	12.1%	23.1%	24.2%	15.6%
White	73	8.2%	13.1%	28.8%	20.4%	24.7%	29.1%	38.4%	37.4%
Individual Education Plan Students	20	20.0%	46.5%	35.0%	25.1%	15.0%	15.8%	30.0%	12.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students	13	15.4%	34.0%	30.8%	31.8%	23.1%	24.0%	30.8%	10.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	43	28.6%	28.9%	31.0%	27.9%	31.0%	26.7%	9.5%	16.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	188	17.2%	20.8%	28.0%	24.4%	29.6%	27.4%	25.3%	27.3%
Male	36	22.2%	21.6%	30.6%	23.6%	27.8%	26.1%	19.4%	28.7%
Female	84	21.4%	20.0%	28.6%	25.3%	32.1%	28.7%	17.9%	26.0%
Asian	32	9.4%	9.7%	25.0%	19.3%	31.3%	29.2%	34.4%	41.9%
Black	37	30.6%	33.8%	41.7%	28.6%	16.7%	23.0%	11.1%	14.6%
White	80	12.7%	12.7%	22.8%	20.2%	32.9%	28.8%	31.6%	38.3%
Individual Education Plan Students	17	37.5%	46.5%	25.0%	24.6%	31.3%	16.6%	6.3%	12.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	39	23.7%	29.7%	31.6%	29.1%	34.2%	25.5%	10.5%	15.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	180	14.5%	21.4%	21.2%	24.6%	31.3%	26.9%	33.0%	27.0%
Male	89	18.0%	22.6%	22.5%	23.5%	31.5%	25.5%	28.1%	28.5%
Female	91	11.1%	20.3%	20.0%	25.7%	31.1%	28.5%	37.8%	25.6%
Asian	22	9.1%	10.8%	13.6%	20.7%	31.8%	27.8%	45.5%	40.7%
Hispanic	31	29.0%	30.1%	22.6%	28.9%	25.8%	25.5%	22.6%	15.5%
Black	37	21.6%	34.7%	45.9%	27.9%	24.3%	22.3%	8.1%	15.1%
White	89	8.0%	13.0%	12.5%	20.8%	35.2%	28.9%	44.3%	37.3%
Individual Education Plan Students	21	30.0%	46.2%	40.0%	26.1%	25.0%	16.2%	5.0%	11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	28	28.6%	31.5%	28.6%	29.1%	28.6%	24.2%	14.3%	15.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 4

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	168	18.5%	23.7%	23.8%	27.6%	28.6%	25.3%	29.2%	23.5%
Male	91	20.9%	25.9%	20.9%	27.8%	24.2%	24.1%	34.1%	22.2%
Female	77	15.6%	21.4%	27.3%	27.3%	33.8%	26.5%	23.4%	24.8%
Asian	19	15.8%	13.4%	15.8%	26.1%	42.1%	30.3%	26.3%	30.2%
Black	34	20.6%	31.9%	26.5%	30.0%	29.4%	23.9%	23.5%	14.2%
White	73	12.3%	11.6%	20.5%	21.5%	28.8%	29.4%	38.4%	37.5%
Individual Education Plan Students	20	50.0%	53.9%	20.0%	24.7%	5.0%	12.0%	25.0%	9.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students	13	30.8%	51.7%	30.8%	34.9%	38.5%	11.1%	0.0%	2.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	43	32.6%	35.4%	30.2%	32.7%	27.9%	21.0%	9.3%	10.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 4

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Theron H. & Naomi D. Goynes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	168	12.5%	19.9%	23.2%	26.8%	34.5%	31.5%	29.8%	21.8%
Male	91	13.2%	21.4%	19.8%	26.2%	36.3%	29.8%	30.8%	22.6%
Female	77	11.7%	18.2%	27.3%	27.6%	32.5%	33.3%	28.6%	20.9%
Asian	19	10.5%	13.2%	26.3%	22.9%	26.3%	35.2%	36.8%	28.7%
Black	34	20.6%	29.7%	38.2%	33.6%	20.6%	26.2%	20.6%	10.5%
White	73	5.5%	11.8%	11.0%	19.6%	47.9%	34.4%	35.6%	34.2%
Individual Education Plan Students	20	20.0%	34.7%	30.0%	31.4%	20.0%	22.3%	30.0%	11.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students	13	15.4%	35.4%	38.5%	38.4%	15.4%	22.2%	30.8%	4.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students	43	30.2%	28.0%	30.2%	33.0%	20.9%	28.2%	18.6%	10.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI