Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Young Lars Academy For Excellence School in Houston, TX
(PK-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 44
Address
 1809 LOUISIANA ST
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone
(713) 654-1404
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.houstonisd.org
City-data.com school rating
44
Students
189
Free lunch eligible students
132
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
21
School district
HOUSTON ISD
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
HOUSTON ISD (#101912)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CARNEGIE VANGUARD H S (0.8 miles):

97
WHARTON K-8 DUAL LANGUAGE ACADEMY (1.1 miles):

92
PERFOR & VIS ARTS H S (1.4 miles):

92
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE ACADEMY AT RYAN (1.5 miles):

89
YOUNG WOMEN'S COLLEGE PREP ACADEMY (1.5 miles):

66
HOUSTON ACADEMY FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (1.1 miles):

54
Young Lars Academy For Excellence School:

44
GREGORY-LINCOLN ED CTR (0.8 miles):

16
HARRIS COUNTY JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER (1.0 miles):

5
Young Lars Academy For Excellence School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Harris County:

51
Houston:

47
Young Lars Academy For Excellence:

44

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 189
Enrollment in 2015: 182
Enrollment in 2014: 192
Enrollment in 2013: 223
Enrollment in 2012: 192
Enrollment in 2011: 168
Enrollment in 2010: 187
Enrollment in 2009: 181
Enrollment in 2008: 184
Enrollment in 2007: 190
Enrollment in 2006: 140
Enrollment in 2005: 375
Enrollment in 2004: 478
Enrollment in 2003: 399
Enrollment in 2002: 241
Enrollment in 2001: 26
Enrollment in 2000: 33
Enrollment in 1999: 7

Young Lars Academy For Excellence School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08Total
All students2218312320242113710189
Female students14111312151112955107
Male students871811513942582
Hispanic students212233112320
Black students191629211621201257166
White students - 1 - - - - - - - - 1
Two or More Races students1 - - - 1 - - - - - 2

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 22
Kindergarten enrollment: 18
1st grade enrollment: 31
2nd grade enrollment: 23
3rd grade enrollment: 20
4th grade enrollment: 24
5th grade enrollment: 21
6th grade enrollment: 13
7th grade enrollment: 7
8th grade enrollment: 10

Young Lars Academy For Excellence School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 107 (56.6%)
Young Lars Academy For Excellence School:

56.6%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 82 (43.4%)
Young Lars Academy For Excellence School:

43.4%
Texas:

50.1%

Young Lars Academy For Excellence School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Hispanic enrollment: 20 (10.6%)
School:

10.6%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 166 (87.8%)
Here:

87.8%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 1 (0.5%)
School:

0.5%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 2 (1.1%)
School:

1.1%
Texas:

2.1%

Young Lars Academy For Excellence School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 153 (81.0%)
School:

81.0%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 132 (69.8%)
Here:

69.8%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 21 (11.1%)
School:

11.1%
Texas:

6.2%

Young Lars Academy For Excellence School - Lunch Program Eligibility


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $517,322
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 11.5 (Salary Expenditures: $317,749)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.7 (Salary Expenditures: $37,320)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $162,253)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $818,890
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $555,756
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $356,183
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.7 (Salary Expenditures: $37,320)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $162,253)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $957,213

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 4

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Here:

11.1%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
School:

22.6%
State:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
School:

20.0%
Texas:

4.1%

Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Here:

8.3%
Texas:

3.6%

Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Young Lars Academy For Excellence School:

9.5%
Texas:

4.3%

Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Percent of 6th grade students retained
Young Lars Academy For Excellence School:

15.4%
Texas:

6.3%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Young Lars Academy For Excellence School:

31.7
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,369
  • Males1,356
  • Females1,381
  • Black1,361
Math Average Scale Score:

1,369
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 22
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 22

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.9 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 4%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

59%
32%
4%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,356, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
55%
45%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,381, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 64%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 9%)
64%
18%
9%
9%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,361, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 0%)
59%
35%
6%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,321
  • Males1,310
  • Females1,331
  • Black1,302
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,321
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 22
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 22

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.5 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

59%
23%
13%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,310, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 64%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 9%)
64%
27%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,331, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 0%)
55%
18%
27%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,302, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 0%)
59%
29%
12%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,518
  • Males1,525
  • Females1,513
  • Black1,496
Math Average Scale Score:

1,518
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 17
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 17

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.5 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 47%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

35%
47%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,525, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 72%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 14%)
14%
72%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,513, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
50%
30%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 13%)
38%
50%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,492
  • Males1,477
  • Females1,502
  • Black1,471
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,492
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 17
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 17

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 6%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

53%
6%
23%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
57%
29%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,502, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
50%
10%
20%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,471, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
56%
6%
25%
13%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,545
  • Males3,307
  • Females3,712
  • Black3,478
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,545
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 17
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 17

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.6 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

53%
18%
23%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,307, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
57%
29%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,712, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 10%)
50%
10%
30%
10%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,478, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
56%
19%
25%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,502
  • Males1,471
  • Black1,486
Math Average Scale Score:

1,502
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 10
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 10

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.5 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.1 (28%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 60%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

30%
60%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,471, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 67%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
33%
67%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,486, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 63%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
38%
63%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,469
  • Males1,447
  • Black1,455
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,469
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 10
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 10

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

50%
30%
10%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,447, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
50%
33%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,455, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
50%
37%
13%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,371
  • Males3,287
  • Black3,328
Science Average Scale Score:

3,371
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 10
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 10

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.8 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.5 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.7 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 70%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

70%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,287, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 83%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
83%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,328, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 75%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
75%
25%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,645
  • Males1,656
  • Females1,632
  • Black1,652
Math Average Scale Score:

1,645
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 11
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.8 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (43%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 46%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

9%
46%
36%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,656, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
50%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,632, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,652, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 10%)
10%
40%
40%
10%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,601
  • Males1,589
  • Females1,616
  • Black1,610
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,601
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 11
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.9 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 55%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

18%
55%
9%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 83%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
83%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 40%)
40%
20%
40%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,610, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 20%)
10%
60%
10%
20%

7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,677
  • Males1,632
  • Females1,777
  • Black1,677
Math Average Scale Score:

1,677
State:

1,571
Math students tested: 16
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.3 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.1 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 50%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

13%
50%
13%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,632, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 64%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 9%)
18%
64%
9%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,777, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 60%)
20%
20%
60%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,677, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 25%)
13%
50%
13%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,643
  • Males1,604
  • Females1,729
  • Black1,643
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,643
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 16
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.2 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.4 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

19%
43%
19%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 9%)
27%
55%
9%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,729, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 40%)
20%
40%
40%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 19%)
19%
43%
19%
19%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,857
  • Males3,835
  • Females3,906
  • Black3,857
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,857
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 16
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.9 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.3 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

19%
43%
25%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,835, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 9%)
27%
37%
27%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,906, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
60%
20%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,857, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
19%
43%
25%
13%

8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,699
  • Males1,676
  • Females1,719
  • Black1,677
Math Average Scale Score:

1,699
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 11
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.5 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 46%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

27%
18%
46%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,676, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
40%
20%
20%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,719, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 0%)
17%
16%
67%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,677, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 11%)
33%
23%
33%
11%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,674
  • Males1,610
  • Females1,727
  • Black1,628
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,674
State:

1,561
Reading students tested: 11
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.5 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.7 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 46%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

18%
46%
18%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,610, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
20%
60%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,727, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
17%
33%
17%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 11%)
22%
45%
22%
11%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,776
  • Males3,572
  • Females3,922
  • Black3,727
Science Average Scale Score:

3,776
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 12
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 12

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.2 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

25%
42%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,572, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,922, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 0%)
14%
43%
43%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,727, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 0%)
30%
40%
30%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,496
  • Males3,391
  • Females3,570
  • Black3,406
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,496
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 12
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 12

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.9 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.5 (50%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 8%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

50%
42%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,391, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,570, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
43%
43%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,406, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 18 (male: 11, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

95.2
State:

147.9

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Houston, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents