Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2015, 06:10 PM
 
Location: LBC
4,156 posts, read 5,563,422 times
Reputation: 3594

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by slo1318 View Post
And while the air is cleaned up in the bay area, how is the cost of living? Highest in the nation?
I actually have a covered california plan, do you? They are awful, I do not recommend.
Are you really trying to argue state regulations account for the relative cost of housing - the main Calif COL outlier- rather than actual demand?

The ACA argument makes as little sense. But for shiggles, I have shopped the private health plans accessed through the CC exchange. They generally offer the same minimal coverage previously marketed, only more readily available.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2015, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,275,432 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
Sure would have been nice if the tesla plant opened here instead of Nevada, would have been hundreds if not thousands of high paying jobs, guess why they didn't open here? Yes that is right, regulation.
Regulation had nothing to do with Tesla locating in Nevada, Tesla went with the highest bidder. Nevada ponied up 1.25 billion, California only offered them 500 million and Nevada is just now realizing how badly they got screwed over. Tesla is importing the lithium from Mexico rather than buying it from NV mines, and they are importing 200 Panasonic workers to make batteries.

Nevada has never been very clever about giving taxpayer money to 'lure' business to the state. a few years ago they gave Apple eighty-eight million in tax breaks - and they will probably never get anything for that, Apple built a lights out data center, they will never need more than a few onsite employees who know how to swap out a router.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2015, 06:26 PM
 
Location: LBC
4,156 posts, read 5,563,422 times
Reputation: 3594
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Regulation had nothing to do with Tesla locating in Nevada, Tesla went with the highest bidder. Nevada ponied up 1.25 billion, California only offered them 500 million and Nevada is just now realizing how badly they got screwed over. Tesla is importing the lithium from Mexico rather than buying it from NV mines, and they are importing 200 Panasonic workers to make batteries.

Nevada has never been very clever about giving taxpayer money to 'lure' business to the state. a few years ago they gave Apple eighty-eight million in tax breaks - and they will probably never get anything for that, Apple built a lights out data center, they will never need more than a few onsite employees who know how to swap out a router.
Beat me to it.

SFL, what was your source for believing the Tesla decision turned on regulations?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2015, 07:54 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,822,024 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by nslander View Post
Beat me to it.

SFL, what was your source for believing the Tesla decision turned on regulations?
Elon Musk is the source

California didn’t make Tesla’s list of potential sites for the battery plant because of the amount of time needed to win environmental and regulatory approval, Musk said.

“California has a lot of regulatory agencies, and although this will be a very green factory, we can’t have a situation where an enormous amount of data has to be processed by a regulatory agency to find no significant impact and then give us approval to proceed,” he said.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...phasizes-speed

The plant is supposed to provide 6,500 high paying jobs. Maybe even more as demand for lithium batteries constantly increases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2015, 08:03 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,275,432 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
Elon Musk is the source

California didn’t make Tesla’s list of potential sites for the battery plant because of the amount of time needed to win environmental and regulatory approval, Musk said.

“California has a lot of regulatory agencies, and although this will be a very green factory, we can’t have a situation where an enormous amount of data has to be processed by a regulatory agency to find no significant impact and then give us approval to proceed,” he said.
Tesla Plans Multiple Battery Sites to Speed Up Supplies - Bloomberg Business

The plant is supposed to provide 6,500 high paying jobs. Maybe even more as demand for lithium batteries constantly increases.
That was in April 2014, but "In an interview in early June, Tesla’s top communications official said the state was back in the game"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2015, 08:17 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,822,024 times
Reputation: 6509
Probably trying to get California to waive certain environmental restrictions, like they did for the basketball stadium in Sacramento and to drive up the bid from other states as well.

Ultimately, the ability to get off the ground quickly to provide batteries for a new product was paramount. This put places like NV in a position that could not be matched in ca without violating the regulations (that drive out business, which is my point).

The tesla plant would probably not even have broken ground yet if it decided to build in California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2015, 08:45 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 4,011,395 times
Reputation: 3284
This could not have been shot down without democrats saying no to it too.

The fact is, Brown new it was destined to fail. It's political chess and he was pandering to his eco base, that resents him for being fiscally middle of the road. Just like he knows high speed rail will never happen. But it sure sounds good, and made a lot of his friends richer.

Let's be real, pretty much rich white people are the only people that can afford to live near the office. Everyone else commutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2015, 09:08 PM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,119,808 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by WizardOfRadical View Post
This could not have been shot down without democrats saying no to it too.

The fact is, Brown new it was destined to fail. It's political chess and he was pandering to his eco base, that resents him for being fiscally middle of the road. Just like he knows high speed rail will never happen. But it sure sounds good, and made a lot of his friends richer.

Let's be real, pretty much rich white people are the only people that can afford to live near the office. Everyone else commutes.
Race? I'd think rich blacks, latinos, asians and indians live near the office...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2015, 09:16 PM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,119,808 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by nslander View Post
Are you really trying to argue state regulations account for the relative cost of housing - the main Calif COL outlier- rather than actual demand?

The ACA argument makes as little sense. But for shiggles, I have shopped the private health plans accessed through the CC exchange. They generally offer the same minimal coverage previously marketed, only more readily available.

100% - Ive been in the home building industry for 25 years, degree in architecture. Yes, they have an enormous effect on the cost of housing. Its not the only factor but its huge. If you can get a permit to build your home in Dallas for $4000 compared to $60,000 for an average size home. Not only that, but the regulation on each trade that works on home construction is highly demanding and expensive and adds heavily to construction cost. The affect is that only people with a lot of money can afford to build a custom home.



I have one of those crappy plans. First, only two insurance companies are participating. Second only 1/3 or the doctors actually accept them. Third, imagine making a change to your auto insurance, but first you have your agent has to get approval through the DMV. This is what its like. I made a prescription change 17 days ago, the insurance company has to wait for approval through covered California and they arent really motivated to help. After two weeks they asked me to write a letter explaining the situation!
Soon, I'll be back on private insurance, but I feel for those who are stuck with that ACA crap. The government doesnt need to be involved in health decisions. There has to be another way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2015, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Sylmar, a part of Los Angeles
8,342 posts, read 6,431,022 times
Reputation: 17463
SB 350 only had gas use requirements that had to be met. It never said how these were going to be met. That would be up to the EPA, a unelected, accaountable to no one department led by a crazy person.
The only way they could cut gas use is by denying it or extreme taxes making it so expensive people would drastically change. I think Democrats knew if they passed this they were done. This would have been a killer for the poor and Democrats are always saying their for the little guy.
Everything is shipped by gas or diesel.
Electric cars only get 70 miles to a charge and are the size of a matchbox car or cost $100,000 so for the average person electric cars don't exist.
Brown is the high priest of his own pagen religion of the enviroment, he is dangerous.
The air is clean now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top