Kirk Cameron says fornication and adultery are bigger problems than gay marriage (sin, morals)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He could have done quite well as an actor if he wanted to. But when he became a Christian he backed off of his acting career. To make that suggestion simply isn't logical. If all he wanted was money he'd be acting.
Little Mikey Seaver was as good as the ensemble cast surrounding him. He is not a good actor. I sat through Fireproof. Torture I tell you, torture
No King Lear, or Hamlet in him and it has nothing to do with his faith.
So what makes something right and wrong? Are you able to say? Is it just assumed that some things are right? Some are wrong?
In the case of cheating on your spouse, how about asking yourself if the action you are considering will harm anyone, and are you taking into account the best interest of everyone who will be impacted by that course of action? I think that's pretty generally accepted criteria.
He could have done quite well as an actor if he wanted to. But when he became a Christian he backed off of his acting career. To make that suggestion simply isn't logical. If all he wanted was money he'd be acting.
He could make oodles of money producing and directing successful movies. Unfortunately for him..... he makes terrible movies.
In the case of cheating on your spouse, how about asking yourself if the action you are considering will harm anyone, and are you taking into account the best interest of everyone who will be impacted by that course of action? I think that's pretty generally accepted criteria.
I've repeatedly asked this question and have never had anyone tell me: Why is the question of harm the deciding factor to determine right and wrong? Did you get that from some cosmic rulebook or something?
I've repeatedly asked this question and have never had anyone tell me: Why is the question of harm the deciding factor to determine right and wrong? Did you get that from some cosmic rulebook or something?
The "cosmic rule" is LOVE, Vizio (or, in Christian-ese, the spirit of God). Do you need a book to tell you to love and have concern for the best interest of your partner, your children, the person you want to have an affair with, their spouse, their children?
Honestly, it's a bit odd that you are even asking the question. Many people, Christian and non-Christian, take the well-being of others as well as self into account when deciding whether an action they wish to take is "right or wrong". If you don't, why?
The same way you, and Dr Ben Carson know you would be out of control without biblical direction.
You need the bible, and others manage successful lives without it. Being good is obviously not innate in everyone.
You really haven't answered the question, either. What makes something "good", or "moral"? How is that determined? What source do you appeal to? Do you understand what I'm asking?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Torture I tell you, torture
