Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-26-2009, 04:17 PM
 
187 posts, read 315,015 times
Reputation: 31

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by caucazhin View Post
Luke 21:23-24
Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled"

"Early Christian tradition is almost unanimous in assigning the Apocalypse to the last years of Domitian." Henry Barclay Swete

http://www.historicism.com/misc/preterism.htm

http://newwine.org/Articles/Preterism.htm
Revelation 11:2 But leave out the court which is outside the temple, and do not measure it, for it has been given to the Gentiles. And they will tread the holy city underfoot for forty-two months.

I suppose you will say that it is just a coincidence that the Roman(gentile) siege of Jerusalem was forty-two months. Which mind you was fulfilled in 70ad.

Regarding the dating of Jerusalem. Actually very few attribute it to the time of Domitian. A common error. You should really do some more research. Even well studied futurists agree that it was written before 70ad.

Extensive research has been done and the overwhelming conclusion is that it was written before 70ad.

Consider the Syriac translation of the Apocalypse. One of the earliest manuscripts still in existence. The opening notes said:

"The Revelation, which was made by God to John the Evangelist, in the island of Patmos, to which he was banished by Nero the Emperor."

Your quote by Barclay was a conclusion he made in ignorance of all the facts. An error many people parrot today rather than doing the research themselves. I used to claim the same thing too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-26-2009, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Seattle, Wa
5,303 posts, read 6,436,320 times
Reputation: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by caucazhin View Post
What I see in front of me is....oh..wait.. won't go there

You and psychomike are already there in your hearts dont fool yourself
Both of you are motivated by selfrighteousness not love

"if a man have hatred in his heart he is already guilty of murder"

I beg to differ...you are the one calling us names.
We are providing exegesis of the scripture...where is yours?

I suppose you believe "at hand" and "quickly" refer to 2000+ years into the future as well?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2009, 04:42 PM
 
303 posts, read 569,848 times
Reputation: 58
http://www.reformedonline.com/view/reformedonline/PreterismRapture.htm

http://www.reformedonline.com/view/reformedonline/Full%20Preterism%20Resurrection.htm

Actually, in 70 AD, the Roman Empire destroyed Israel's temple, killing over a million Jews in the process, and scattering those that remained. This was the fulfillment of Luke 21:24, when Jesus prophesied the destruction of the temple as well as the scattering of Israel when He said, "And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled."


Last edited by caucazhin; 12-26-2009 at 05:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2009, 05:25 PM
 
187 posts, read 315,015 times
Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by caucazhin View Post
http://www.reformedonline.com/view/reformedonline/PreterismRapture.htm

http://www.reformedonline.com/view/reformedonline/Full%20Preterism%20Resurrection.htm

Actually, in 70 AD, the Roman Empire destroyed Israel's temple, killing over a million Jews in the process, and scattering those that remained. This was the fulfillment of Luke 21:24, when Jesus prophesied the destruction of the temple as well as the scattering of Israel when He said, "And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled."
And post #61 has your answer. But that really is of no matter. You can't respond. The scriptures can and have interpreted themselves. The times of the gentiles lasted for 42 months and ended with the destruction of the temple, which took exactly 42 months.

Your query has been resolved. What you do with it is up to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2009, 05:34 PM
 
187 posts, read 315,015 times
Reputation: 31
Default Breaking News...

The A.P. News wire has confirmed that the U.S.S. Futurism has begun sinking. Reports are coming in with a preterist understanding of the term "quickly" from all over the globe. They tried to stop the damage that has continually eaten away at it's core belief of a soon coming return of Christ. Numerous attempts had been made to stop the prognosticators from setting dates but 200 years of failure has finally dealt the view its fatal blow. The attached artist rendition is the last vestiges of the U.S.S. Futurism. And true to form...You will notice that they are not polishing the brass on this sinking ship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2009, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Texas
4,346 posts, read 6,619,043 times
Reputation: 851
Quote:
Originally Posted by psychohmike View Post
The A.P. News wire has confirmed that the U.S.S. Futurism has begun sinking. Reports are coming in with a preterist understanding of the term "quickly" from all over the globe. They tried to stop the damage that has continually eaten away at it's core belief of a soon coming return of Christ. Numerous attempts had been made to stop the prognosticators from setting dates but 200 years of failure has finally dealt the view its fatal blow. The attached artist rendition is the last vestiges of the U.S.S. Futurism. And true to form...You will notice that they are not polishing the brass on this sinking ship.
LoL!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2009, 07:51 PM
 
17,966 posts, read 15,972,754 times
Reputation: 1010
Quote:
Originally Posted by sciotamicks View Post
Were you there? Might want to read up on early church literature...oh wait, but I already showed you some from Eusebius, and you rejected it LOL
If I were there I would have witnessed to the fact that Christ did not return in 70 A.D. because He did not return in 70 A.D.

No one saw Christ return in 70 A.D. If He did why didn't John write about in in Revelation written around 93 A.D.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2009, 07:56 PM
 
17,966 posts, read 15,972,754 times
Reputation: 1010
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
Hi Eusebius,

According to Josephus and Tacitus there was a sighting in the clouds. However Christ returning to them was in judgment and only to Judeans in Jerusalem just as the only the tribes are mentioned in Revelation and not the nations.

Tacitus Histories
Prodigies had occurred, which this nation, prone to superstition, but hating all religious rites, did not deem it lawful to expiate by offering and sacrifice. There had been seen hosts joining battle in the skies, the fiery gleam of arms, the temple illuminated by a sudden radiance from the clouds. The doors of the inner shrine were suddenly thrown open, and a voice of more than mortal tone was heard to cry that the Gods were departing.

Notice not one word said about seeing Jesus Christ come in 70 A.D. No, not even a passing hint.
Quote:
If you are speaking about Jesus returning in as per Acts how is it that he will return in like manner with every eye seeing him since only the Men of Galilee saw him leave? There is no one second coming of Christ. He certainly could come in judgment multiple times or for that matter appear to Paul in Acts 9. That is why the so called literal interpretation is a false one not just according to time.
Now when He had spoken these things, while they watched, He was taken up, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. 10 And while they looked steadfastly toward heaven as He went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel, 11 who also said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will so come in like manner as you saw Him go into heaven.”


There were 500 men who saw Christ ascend into heaven. Every eye shall see Him is vastly more than 500 men.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2009, 08:04 PM
 
20,728 posts, read 19,367,499 times
Reputation: 8288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius View Post
If I were there I would have witnessed to the fact that Christ did not return in 70 A.D. because He did not return in 70 A.D.

No one saw Christ return in 70 A.D. If He did why didn't John write about in in Revelation written around 93 A.D.?

Hi Eusebius,


You are assuming the late date of Revelation which preterism rejects.

You also would not have wanted to be there. If Christ's return is what you want then why will the tribes(not the nations) mourn?

Revelation 1
He is coming with clouds, and every eye will see Him, even they who pierced Him. And all the tribes of the earth will mourn because of Him. Even so, Amen.

Also any biblical scholar knows coming in the clouds is a judgment.

Ezekiel 30
Wail, ‘Woe to the day!’
3 For the day is near,
Even the day of the LORD is near;
It will be a day of clouds, the time of the Gentiles.
In Revelation we see Jesus suggesting he may come in judgment to several places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2009, 08:10 PM
 
20,728 posts, read 19,367,499 times
Reputation: 8288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius View Post

Notice not one word said about seeing Jesus Christ come in 70 A.D. No, not even a passing hint.

Hi Eusebius,

It was a judgment. Any one who did see him perished.

Quote:
There were 500 men who saw Christ ascend into heaven. Every eye shall see Him is vastly more than 500 men.

Then its not in like manner and you have a contradiction. Its easily resolved by ceasing the nonsense of confusing the tribes of Israel with the nations. The Tribes of Israel did see Jesus come in judgment. Acts and Revelation are not a description of the same event.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top