Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2012, 02:13 PM
 
90 posts, read 95,063 times
Reputation: 43

Advertisements

I got this idea from the "what is the 4th city" thread.

Houston and Boston are tied up when it comes to economic output, but with Houston growing faster and diversifying its economy away from energy toward other pursuits due to the business climate, it could start pulling away rapidly away from Boston.

The next area to be passed up is the Bay Area, which despite its population growth, has grown extremely fast as well the past 10 years. However, since Houston is growing faster, the laws of exponential growth states that Houston could pass up the Bay Area soon.

Which metro area has the best-long term prospects economically?

(MODS: I meant to add a poll with this. Could a mod please edit this and add the above question and add "Houston, Boston, and Bay Area as the poll options?)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2012, 05:13 PM
 
78 posts, read 157,400 times
Reputation: 70
Houston will always be superior to both of these cities. It's economy will last longer, the unemployment rates are dropping, and its a powerful city for its region. From the Oil to the healthcare, there really isn't no comparison. Houston is the only city in america that probably rivals the whole middle east in terms of oil. Unlike Houston, San Francisco is being destroyed by cities in Asia, Europe, and even America in terms of being a hub for technology. You think San Francisco is a top for technology? Thats fine, as long as Tokyo, Hong Kong, and Dubai were nuked off the map. Houston's economy is growing faster by the month and jobs are generating like zombies in L4D.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2012, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,963,804 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharp Point View Post
Houston is the only city in america that probably rivals the whole middle east in terms of oil. .
Houston doesn't come close to rivaling certain countries in the Middle East let alone the whole Middle East.

If Houston was up there with Saudi Arabia alone it would definitely be the strongest economy in the US


Quote:
Originally Posted by MostInterestingPoster3 View Post
I got this idea from the "what is the 4th city" thread.

Houston and Boston are tied up when it comes to economic output, but with Houston growing faster and diversifying its economy away from energy toward other pursuits due to the business climate, it could start pulling away rapidly away from Boston.
FYI:

Here is the GDP by metropolitan aree (Or Gross Metropolitan Product):
1.) New York Metropolitan Area $1,280,517
2.) Los Angeles Metropolitan Area $735,743
3.) Chicago Metropolitan Area $532,331
4.) Washington Metropolitan Area $425,167
5.) Greater Houston $384,603
6.) Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington $374,081
7.) Delaware Valley (Philadelphia) $346,932
8.) San Francisco Bay Area $325,927
9.) Greater Boston $313,690

Last edited by HtownLove; 03-04-2012 at 05:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2012, 05:21 PM
 
14,023 posts, read 15,032,674 times
Reputation: 10471
GDP is not always the Best way to measure a city, especally because we are talking about Boston, because Medical research and education are massively important but don't post major profit margined like other sectors of tge economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2012, 05:40 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,941,037 times
Reputation: 7976
Tough one; all look to have bright futures

Would expect Houston to continue to accelerate the fastest (Just look at the price at the pump and yes I know they are diversifying but for better or worse as oil goes so goes the Houston economy though it is better poised to handle a slump in oil).

The Bay next on growth as I think it would grow more quickly than Boston

Boston great fundamantals and a very good future albeit slower absolute growth
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2012, 05:56 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,963,804 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Boston great fundamantals and a very good future albeit slower absolute growth
What are the big economic sectors in Boston apart from the obvious ones?

Apart from Biotech/Medicine/Education/Finance I am not familiar with the other sectors.

For Houston the workforce is made up as follows:

Trade 21%
Professional and Business services 14%
Government 14%
Education 11%
Manufacturing 10%
Leisure and Hospitality 8%
Construction 8%
Finance 6%
Mining 3%
Information 2%

EDIT: Pie Charts of Economic bases:

Boston:
credit: Public Domain Wiki chart

Houston:
Public Domain Wiki Image
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2012, 05:58 PM
 
14,023 posts, read 15,032,674 times
Reputation: 10471
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
What are the big economic sectors in Boston apart from the obvious ones?

Apart from Biotech/Medicine/Education/Finance I am not familiar with the other sectors.

For Houston the workforce is made up as follows:

Trade 21%
Professional and Business services 14%
Government 14%
Education 11%
Manufacturing 10%
Leisure and Hospitality 8%
Construction 8%
Finance 6%
Mining 3%
Information 2%
Tourism, and Boston is acually gaining on SF GDP wise both on the MSA and CSA level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2012, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,557,504 times
Reputation: 21249
Quote:
Originally Posted by MostInterestingPoster3 View Post
I got this idea from the "what is the 4th city" thread.

Houston and Boston are tied up when it comes to economic output, but with Houston growing faster and diversifying its economy away from energy toward other pursuits due to the business climate, it could start pulling away rapidly away from Boston.

The next area to be passed up is the Bay Area, which despite its population growth, has grown extremely fast as well the past 10 years. However, since Houston is growing faster, the laws of exponential growth states that Houston could pass up the Bay Area soon.
Not sure how you came up with this

Houston's GDP is about 47 Billion Dollars smaller than Boston and is 160 Billion Dollars smaller than the Bay Area.

Quote:

2011 GDP

4. San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA CSA $544.969 Billion
Napa, CA Metro Area $7,015
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metro Area $325,927
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metro Area $168,517
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA Metro Area $9,697
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA Metro Area $19,888
Vallejo-Fairfield, CA Metro Area $13,925

6. Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-RI-NH CSA $430.245 Billion
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Metro Area $313,690
Concord, NH Micro Area
Manchester-Nashua, NH Metro Area $20,988
Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA Metro Area $66,334
Worcester, MA Metro Area $29,233

7. Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX CSA $384.603 Billion
Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX Metro Area $384,603
As far as private industry only, the Bay Area is 3rd behind NY and LA. Boston is 6th, Houston is 7th.

Quote:
Private Industry/Non Govt GDP, 2011

3. San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA CSA $500.639 Billion
Napa, CA Metro Area $6,222
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metro Area $297,242
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metro Area $159,727
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA Metro Area $8,401
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA Metro Area $17,888
Vallejo-Fairfield, CA Metro Area $11,159

6. Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-RI-NH CSA $391.513 Billion
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Metro Area $288,834
Concord, NH Micro Area
Manchester-Nashua, NH Metro Area $19,220
Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA Metro Area $57,890
Worcester, MA Metro Area $25,569

7. Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX CSA $356.624 Billion
Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX Metro Area $356,624
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2012, 05:59 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,156 posts, read 39,441,390 times
Reputation: 21253
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
Houston doesn't come close to rivaling certain countries in the Middle East let alone the whole Middle East.

If Houston was up there with Saudi Arabia alone it would definitely be the strongest economy in the US



FYI:

Here is the GDP by metropolitan aree (Or Gross Metropolitan Product):
1.) New York Metropolitan Area $1,280,517
2.) Los Angeles Metropolitan Area $735,743
3.) Chicago Metropolitan Area $532,331
4.) Washington Metropolitan Area $425,167
5.) Greater Houston $384,603
6.) Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington $374,081
7.) Delaware Valley (Philadelphia) $346,932
8.) San Francisco Bay Area $325,927
9.) Greater Boston $313,690
Yea, saying Houston has the oil wealth of all the middle east is so patently absurd, I don't even know where to begin.

Also, as you probably already know, that GMP has the Bay Area split up into SF/East Bay and the SJ/South Bay areas which is not at all how the Bay Area operates. The Bay Area is polycentric, but strongly connected. The Bay Area as a whole is around 500 billion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2012, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,557,504 times
Reputation: 21249
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Tourism, and Boston is acually gaining on SF GDP wise both on the MSA and CSA level.
Well, Boston has a larger CSA and MSA(I think) and shouldnt have a GDP that is $100 Billion smaller.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oycrumbler
The Bay Area as a whole is about 483 billion.
The SF and SJ MSAs combined have a $494 Billion GDP in 2010, which is above what it should be for 6.1 Million people.

But if you add in the rest of the Bay Area the total climbs to $544 Billion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top