Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-30-2012, 09:43 AM
 
Location: South Florida
5,025 posts, read 7,464,176 times
Reputation: 5487

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERS-One View Post
I read once that Milwaukee is the most protected from natural disasters.
I was just discussing this last night.
While it gets cold as hell a few months..and can get a ton of snow.. that's it.

However, there are nearby areas that get tornados.
I've heard Lake Michigan somehow protects Milwaukee from tornados.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-30-2012, 11:09 AM
 
1,267 posts, read 3,078,038 times
Reputation: 1254
El Paso, Texas

No Hurricanes, No Tornadoes, No Earthquakes, No Snow Blizzards, No humidity,No crime, and not as hot as Phoenix. Good looking Latinas.Very Affordable. But a little boring compared to other cities its size.

Its still pretty hot, but hispanics rarely leave their babies in the car. Grandma is always taking care of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 11:12 AM
 
6,843 posts, read 10,984,727 times
Reputation: 8436
I moved from Houston to Washington DC this year and I never thought I'd have to deal with hurricanes here too. That too, it was a category one and did so much damage here (because of the high population density & concentration) whereas back in Houston a category one would be laughable.

There are lots of trees down and snapped, I saw this when I went outside this morning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Chicago
1,312 posts, read 1,873,162 times
Reputation: 1488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Almeida93 View Post
El Paso, Texas

No Hurricanes, No Tornadoes, No Earthquakes, No Snow Blizzards, No humidity,No crime, and not as hot as Phoenix. Good looking Latinas.Very Affordable. But a little boring compared to other cities its size.

Its still pretty hot, but hispanics rarely leave their babies in the car. Grandma is always taking care of them.
What about a drought?



My money would be on the "Great Lakes" area, more specifically Chicago, and to a lesser extent (given the title of the thread) Milwaukee.

They both sit on one of the BIGGEST supplies of fresh water in the entire WORLD. Limited chance for tornadoes. A limited chance for flooding. Not near any major fault lines. Forest fires are rare. No mud slides ever. No hurricanes. No typhoons. No tropical storms. Hurricanes only bring weather that the region is used to. Debilitating blizzards are rare.

Am I missing anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Betsyville
103 posts, read 274,451 times
Reputation: 127
This website gives a list of where to live to avoid natural disasters.
Where to Live to Avoid a Natural Disaster - Map - NYTimes.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Orlandooooooo
2,363 posts, read 5,210,261 times
Reputation: 890
First thought, Denver
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 01:54 PM
 
4,479 posts, read 3,833,029 times
Reputation: 3430
Quote:
Originally Posted by CincyIowan View Post
Maybe Boise, Idaho.. or Seattle
Disagree with Seattle-we get big earthquakes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Springfield VA
4,036 posts, read 9,252,374 times
Reputation: 1522
Quote:
Originally Posted by valentro View Post
I moved from Houston to Washington DC this year and I never thought I'd have to deal with hurricanes here too. That too, it was a category one and did so much damage here (because of the high population density & concentration) whereas back in Houston a category one would be laughable.

There are lots of trees down and snapped, I saw this when I went outside this morning.
Things are okay here in Fairfax county. A few trees down but the lights stayed on. I went into the office. Some of my coworkers are still in the dark though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Springfield VA
4,036 posts, read 9,252,374 times
Reputation: 1522
I'd say that no one is truly safe from natural disaster. Phoenix has really bad out of nowhere dust storms. Michigan has bad blizzards. I can't believe anyone would call the upper Midwest safe from a natural disaster. While snow is certainly very common there, it can still cause harm. I understand that snow isn't automatically a natural disaster. Blizzards kill people and at the very least cause power outages, though. Anywhere on the west coast is prone to earthquakes. Forest fires in the Rockies. Denver also has blizzards and ice storms. So yeah nowhere is SAFE, just some places have disasters less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
12,059 posts, read 13,908,855 times
Reputation: 7262
Quote:
Originally Posted by A2DAC1985 View Post
What about a drought?



My money would be on the "Great Lakes" area, more specifically Chicago, and to a lesser extent (given the title of the thread) Milwaukee.

They both sit on one of the BIGGEST supplies of fresh water in the entire WORLD. Limited chance for tornadoes. A limited chance for flooding. Not near any major fault lines. Forest fires are rare. No mud slides ever. No hurricanes. No typhoons. No tropical storms. Hurricanes only bring weather that the region is used to. Debilitating blizzards are rare.

Am I missing anything?
I lived in the Midwest for a while and those ice storms are ferocious. Cars sliding around and hitting walls killing people, power out in homes for weeks at a time in single digit weather, and the inability to walk on a sidewalk without slipping and breaking your head. Then the tornadoes in the spring are horrible, not to mention the spring thaw that causes rivers to overflow banks and flood large areas.

I don't agree that the Midwest is safe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top