Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-15-2013, 10:51 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,531,365 times
Reputation: 12152

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
So why did you single out Atlanta and not call out Dallas or Houston? I think Atlanta is easily more known around the world then those cities, but I do agree with you, Atlanta is not an international powerhouse. It's a national powerhouse trying to find it's way towards an international powerhouse, but still has decades, if not a century to go.

But to place Seattle over Atlanta is laughable and it tells me a lot about a bias you towards Atlanta. They don't even have a transit system that's better then Atlanta's. Seattle is a regional powerhouse.
Why would you say this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-15-2013, 11:06 AM
 
209 posts, read 461,931 times
Reputation: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
So why did you single out Atlanta and not call out Dallas or Houston? I think Atlanta is easily more known around the world then those cities, but I do agree with you, Atlanta is not an international powerhouse. It's a national powerhouse trying to find it's way towards an international powerhouse, but still has decades, if not a century to go.

But to place Seattle over Atlanta is laughable and it tells me a lot about a bias you towards Atlanta. They don't even have a transit system that's better then Atlanta's. Seattle is a regional powerhouse.
I do not agree with you.

No one has the right to say one city is more known around the world than another unless you live all around the world and can give your input.

In terms of being known nationally, all three cities are equal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
Based on the center of activity of these metros I would rank their potential of becoming alpha as:

Potential to become Alpha
1. Atlanta 96%
2. Houston 95%
3. Miami 84%
4. Dallas 81%
5. Fort Worth 47%

When I think of global cities I think powerful economies like NY, London, Tokyo, Paris.

Here is how I rank the potential of these to become global economic powers

Economy
1. Houston 100%
2. Dallas 82% (pulls to dead even by metro)
3. ATL 66%
4. Miami 60%
5. Fort Worth 40%

When I think of Global cities, I think of a strong core population. Here is how I rank their potential

Population:
1. Miami 99%
2. Houston 94%
3. ATL 92%
4. Dallas 88%
5. Fort Worth 51%

When I think of a global city, I think of one with lots of centralized activities. Here is my view of their potential:

In the performing arts:
1. Houston- 100%
2. ATL 88%
3. Dallas 75%
4. Miami 66%
5. FW 60%

Museums:
1. Houston 99%
2. ATL 98%
3. Miami 94%
4. Dallas 90%
5. FW 88%

In Night Life
1. Miami- 100%
2. AtL- 98%
3. Houston- 97%
3. Dallas- 97%
5. FW- 70%

In Sports (Having the most centralized venues)
1. Houston 95%
2. ATL 88%
3. Miami 75%
4. Dallas 70% (don't see teams returning to the core soon)

Parks
1. Miami- 100%
1. Houston 100%
1. ATL 100%
1. Dallas 100%
1. FW 100%


A global city must have great transportation. Here is how I rank transport potential in their cores

Transportation
1. ATL 90%
2. Miami 88%
3. Houston 80%
4. Dallas 75%
5. Fort Worth 50%

Universities clusters in the core
1. ATL 100%
1. Houston 100%
3. Dallas 94%
4. Miami 73%

will do other categories later. Anyway remember this was done with a view at centralization and based on personal perception of potential in each
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 11:25 AM
 
725 posts, read 1,211,252 times
Reputation: 284
Your percentages are biased, plus some are WAY off, one that come to mind is the transportation/parks/nightlife/university's/and sports are WAY off. ^^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toure View Post
Your percentages are biased, plus some are WAY off, one that come to mind is the transportation/parks/nightlife/university's/and sports are WAY off. ^^
way off as you have seen the future and my guess were off?

what about tonights lottery numbers????


make your own list and stop harrasing mine.

I wrote a zillion times that these are my OPINIONS, on POTENTIAL cause I know some idiots would come in and say oh know this place has more... than this place, but despite that it still happened *sigh*

I will bite on the parks one. What do you dislike? You think I should give ATL a 101% potential? They all got 100% for christsakes. They are ALLL building more and more urban parks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 11:49 AM
 
650 posts, read 1,629,839 times
Reputation: 307
Miami currently has most international flair of the 4, and it has the most potential b/c of its location, and room for improvement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,531,365 times
Reputation: 12152
Quote:
Originally Posted by canefandynasty View Post
Miami currently has most international flair of the 4, and it has the most potential b/c of its location, and room for improvement.
Honestly, I think Houston and Miami locations are tied. Socially, Miami is more international. Economically, I think Houston is more international. All four have room for improvement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Lufkin, Texas
43 posts, read 122,407 times
Reputation: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
That's ok boo. The lufkin skyline is impressive enough to compensate. The area is getting more uniform as the Houston CSA via Trinity now touches Lufkin/ Angelina County. We dont feel bad about not having tall buildings with Lufkin and Nacogdoches so close to our doorstep to rescue us with their marvelous skylines
I dont know what's up with Dee...Houston has one of the best skylines in the country while Dee brags about 4 story apartment complexes in Nac. Just for the record he's from Nac so don't lump Lufkin in with Dee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 12:35 PM
 
725 posts, read 1,211,252 times
Reputation: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
way off as you have seen the future and my guess were off?

what about tonights lottery numbers????


make your own list and stop harrasing mine.

I wrote a zillion times that these are my OPINIONS, on POTENTIAL cause I know some idiots would come in and say oh know this place has more... than this place, but despite that it still happened *sigh*

I will bite on the parks one. What do you dislike? You think I should give ATL a 101% potential? They all got 100% for christsakes. They are ALLL building more and more urban parks.
Ok...?
Transportation
1. ATL 90% too high
2. Miami 88%
3. Houston 80%
4. Dallas 75%

5. Fort Worth 50%
The bold ALL have bad public transportation

Universities clusters in the core
1. ATL 100%
1. Houston 100%
3. Dallas 94%
4. Miami 73%
Again WRONG, there's not many in any of these cities cores. There are a few tho...

In Night Life
1. Miami- 100% would say 100
2. AtL- 98%
3. Houston- 97%
3. Dallas- 97%
5. FW- 70%

BOLD all ranked WAY too high.

Museums:
1. Houston 99% 81
2. ATL 98% 86
3. Miami 94% 78
4. Dallas 90% 78
5. FW 88%
60
Again all ranked too high.

In the performing arts:
1. Houston- 100%
2. ATL 88%
3. Dallas 75%

4. Miami 66%
5. FW 60%
BOLD too high again.. *sigh*

Who has the mental problem? No way are these good calculations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 01:29 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,133,368 times
Reputation: 6338
Atlanta has Tech, Georgia State and a branch of SCAD within it's immediate core alone. Within a 5-7 mile radius, you have Morehouse, Spellman, and Emory. I think it rates pretty high as far as universities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top