Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-13-2013, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
2,314 posts, read 4,800,276 times
Reputation: 1946

Advertisements

That guy is an absolute 100% moron on every single level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2013, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,755,023 times
Reputation: 10592
I do agree about Austin and Ashville, not the others though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2013, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Chicago(Northside)
3,678 posts, read 7,218,274 times
Reputation: 1697
Defiantly Austin totally agree but not really the others though, in fact most people dont know you can go to the beach in Chicago packed with tans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2013, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Milky Way Galaxy
669 posts, read 916,459 times
Reputation: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly Addams View Post
What does it have that most every other big city doesn't? Statue of Liberty, Brooklyn Bridge? Every city has their own man made structures that people enjoy seeing. NYC is just another big city that is over hyped all the time. However, if you're all about celebrities and all of that non sense I can see why people love it.
You really have a lot to learn if you really believe all NYC offers is structures and celebrities.

I would say NYC pretty much offers everything a city lifer would look for. Even if are looking for some quite time at the country side it's not that far away from those places.

Last edited by yyuusr; 04-13-2013 at 08:43 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2013, 08:42 AM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,754 posts, read 23,832,257 times
Reputation: 14671
I don't agree with most of his assertions and I question the standards of the writing at Huffington Post when all of this easily could have been written by some average uninformed writer here on C-D.

Quote:
#4 Vancouver
It's really super to see Canadians being assertive and exhibiting national pride. But in the case of Vancouver, all that rah, rah, rah is regrettably misplaced. Sure, the one they call Lotusland may photograph well, but maybe just stay home and look at pictures, because there really isn't much below the surface -- nothing unique anyway. You want a city core that alternates rather unpredictably between completely boring and absolutely terrifying, with close proximity to some of the continent's best Chinese food? And also tons and tons of traffic? Go to Los Angeles, where the weather's better and there are also tacos. That public market Vancouver's tourist board loves so much? No better than what you'll find in many an American city, starting right next door in Seattle. The city's only truly unique asset, really, is a giant park that reminds you that you're in one of the most beautiful parts of the world, and that you should get out of town immediately and go see some nature.

Instead, try In the Northwest, your top choice right now is definitely Portland. It is friendly, manageable, affordable; the food is really good, there's enough culture and nature and all that good stuff, without the traffic and grit and expense and hassle of Seattle. But mostly, it has a distinct character, a sense of place. Portland is downright agreeable. (It should also be mentioned that there are some very good strip clubs
.)
I do agree with most of what he said about Vancouver. At first glance it looks dreamy with all the glass towers and a beautiful mountain backdrop. Chinatown is neat, and the best attraction is indeed Stanley Park which is beautiful and it gets better once you head deeper into BC. I've visted there multiple times and began to realize at street level it's just a bunch of glass and concrete boxes, and the people are rather smug. Seattle and Portland definitely have better downtowns.

Quote:
#5 Colorado
Denver is a weirdly bland, Midwestern snore, with an air quality problem. Vail, apart from its slopes, is suburbia in the middle of nowhere, a collection of strip malls by the side of a highway. Also? The Vail Valley is so high up in the mountains, some people are alarmed to find themselves nearly unable to breathe, let alone ski. The rest of the state is too often either uptight and boring (Colorado Springs) or drab and vaguely off-putting (Pueblo, Grand Junction, too many other places to mention). The nicer ski towns, like Aspen, or Telluride? Amazing sure, but they are also buried so far in the mountains, that getting there during ski season -- or any season -- costs time and money too many people don't have. Colorado did legalize marijuana last year, which is great, because next time you go to Denver, you'll have something to do.

Instead, try Nearly everything Colorado does, Utah does as well or better, without the kerfuffle, the crowds or the cost. Skiing? Ride a Salt Lake City bus to some of the hemisphere's best powder at Alta and Snowbird. National Parks? Arches, Canyonlands, Zion -- all among the best in show. For cool small towns with lots to do nearby, there's Moab. There's Springdale. The beer may be more advanced in Colorado, but these days, breweries like Uinta are playing for keeps
.
Oh come on get real! So Denver is a Midwestern snore and Utah - say Salt Lake City as well or better? He didn't have time to get to Telluriude (which is phenominal by the way), that's his and only his problem. And to suggest Denver is Midwestern mediocrety likely means he was just passing through on I-70. This guy is so wrong on so many counts on this one. Denver has much better air quality than it use to and it's been that wat for some 20 years no, and ironically Salt Lake City is the place having horrible air quality issues.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/55...grees.html.csp

Last edited by Champ le monstre du lac; 04-13-2013 at 09:00 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2013, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Milky Way Galaxy
669 posts, read 916,459 times
Reputation: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nafster View Post
That guy is an absolute 100% moron on every single level.
Overreaction much? I agree that there is no way cities like Asheville and Vancouver should be that high up on a list but I can see most of those cities making a lot of people's top 15-20 list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2013, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis (St. Louis Park)
5,993 posts, read 10,196,055 times
Reputation: 4407
Quote:
Originally Posted by yyuusr View Post
You really have a lot to learn if you really believe all NYC offers is structures and celebrities.

I would say NYC pretty much offers everything a city lifer would look for. Even if are looking for some quite time at the country side it's not that far away from those places.
I didn't realize NY'ers had such an inferiorty complex! One C-D'er says something negative about NYC and the thread turns into a "nah uh" thread about NYC. I think comments like those are best dealt with by ignoring them, not responding to them (unless the thread is about that subject).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2013, 09:16 AM
 
87 posts, read 229,870 times
Reputation: 74
He criticizes the hipster in San Francisco who lectured him on how to order coffee correctly, but earlier in the article advises people to visit hipster capital Portland.

He claims Colorado Springs is boring and uptight, but gives no reason why, then advises travelers to visit Mormon-centric Utah instead.

He advises people to visit Detroit instead of Chicago, claiming Detroit has some of the country's best architecture. I didn't see much great architecture in Detroit, just the rumble remains of its iconic ballpark, Tiger Stadium.

Last edited by JMT; 04-13-2013 at 09:44 AM.. Reason: North American cities only.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2013, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis (St. Louis Park)
5,993 posts, read 10,196,055 times
Reputation: 4407
Quote:
Originally Posted by caphillsea77 View Post
Oh come on get real! So Denver is a Midwestern snore and Utah - say Salt Lake City as well or better? He didn't have time to get to Telluriude (which is phenominal by the way), that's his and only his problem. And to suggest Denver is Midwestern mediocrety likely means he was just passing through on I-70. This guy is so wrong on so many counts on this one. Denver has much better air quality than it use to and it's been that wat for some 20 years no, and ironically Salt Lake City is the place having horrible air quality issues.
Utah cities atop EPA
How has Denver's air quality IMPROVED in the last 20 years? That seems unlikely given the fact that the city has added almost a million people since then...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2013, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis (St. Louis Park)
5,993 posts, read 10,196,055 times
Reputation: 4407
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ancient Oracle View Post

He advises people to visit Detroit instead of Chicago, claiming Detroit has some of the country's best architecture. I didn't see much great architecture in Detroit, just the rumble remains of its iconic ballpark, Tiger Stadium.
Detroit does have some amazing architecture, and it's because the city absolutely BOOMED during one of THE best eras of modern architecture: the Art Decco era.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top