Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2013, 12:45 PM
 
87 posts, read 229,640 times
Reputation: 74

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by detroit's own View Post
and what building might this be?
Tiger Stadium.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2013, 12:46 PM
 
406 posts, read 768,452 times
Reputation: 287
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ancient Oracle View Post
Tiger Stadium.
serious?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2013, 01:03 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,517,739 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Min-Chi-Cbus View Post
I don't think Utah is greater than Colorado (actually, I don't hold a strong opinion about either state or their cities), but I DO think Salt Lake City is prettier than Denver, in that it is surrounded by tall mountains that are VERY close to the city.
I'm going to both states for the scenery and landscape and outdoor activities and not really the cities there(I have family just outside Denver so I go there anyways though). Salt Lake is cool just because it has such close proximity to the Wasatch and you can stay in a decent sized city and drive to seven good ski areas within about an hour(or closer depending on where you are in the metro). Denver is a better city overall but you're driving further to reach the Rockies.

Colorado does have more mountain scenery and picturesque mountain towns and big resorts than Utah, but the skiing terrain in Utah is just as good and they usually have better snowfall than most of Colorado--just from a hardcore skiing/snowboarding standpoint and many of the people I knew when I lived in Lake Tahoe who ended up as professional skiers or boarders would probably agree. The other real attraction to Utah is the cool desert scenery in the southern half--other than that much of the state outside of those areas looks like Nevada without casinos. So I'm not really favoring one over the other, both are worth a visit--though I'd say that I probably enjoy to the San Juan Mountains in Colorado over practically any mountain range in the US for scenery except for maybe somewhere like the North Cascades.

Last edited by Deezus; 04-15-2013 at 01:25 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2013, 01:20 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,517,739 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ancient Oracle View Post
What was different about this article was the snide, insulting, know-it-all tone of the article. Yes, many rock journalists write with that tone, but your typical travel piece is not that angry and bitter.
Yeah, the writer is kind of trying a little hard, but it's standard device. Most travel magazine or newspaper travel articles though are basically advertising--you don't really get a lot of really opinionated articles where some writer goes somewhere and is greatly disappointed and let's you know that. It's usually more a long the lines of being one step away from ad-copy--and I know it myself as I wrote for a couple regional travel guides that were basically just that when I was in college--a lot of superlatives and exciting descriptions. There's also the fact that most people don't want to read in depth about a place that some writer isn't recommending(though that's why there's TripAdvisor and Yelp)... Most travel articles are, hey--"Here's a great plan for weekend in Boston!" not "I took a trip to New Orleans and here's why I hate the place."

On the other hand, there's a whole huge coffee table travel book that basically lists out famous travel destinations and then tells you an alternative, less crowded and cheaper destination that are supposedly just as good. In a smarmier way that's what the writer was doing. Though I think they were sort of off with some of what they suggested--because if I was I looking for alternative to Costa Rica without the hype I'd pick Nicaragua, not an expensive and more touristy place like Hawaii. I wouldn't suggest Prague as an alternative to Berlin since they're completely different experiences. Same with Vancouver and Portland--Vancouver is more a tourist city and Portland is more a low-key city of neighborhoods that you have to know what you're looking for... You can visit San Francisco and the rest of the SF Bay Area and some of the surrounding area in a short trip--in fact I'd recommend anyone going to the area see both. Everyone who goes to Asheville goes to the surrounding Blue Ridge Mountains already--most people combine the two for a trip. And Detroit is probably a interesting trip due to the fact that it isn't really a heralded destination, but you're still going to want to travel to Chicago if you've never been there before.

But there's just no reason to get that excited or upset about another list of "what's overrated or underrated". Journalists crank out lists for a reason, they're easy to throw together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2013, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Milky Way Galaxy
669 posts, read 914,924 times
Reputation: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by detroit's own View Post
you visited detroit? yea really? when? smh you people


funny how the ONLY comparison people seem to dwell on is Detroit over Chicago smh that's sad when most of you haven't been here to judge anyway
Are you going to argue with everybody that says anything negative about Detroit? You will be arguing a lot if so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2013, 02:19 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,555 posts, read 28,641,455 times
Reputation: 25141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
Look at the reaction.....
The author accomplished his/her goal.
Only because it's Huffington Post. Otherwise, this list wouldn't be given the time of day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2013, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,933,707 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by po-boy View Post
I actually agree with a lot of that. I find SF, Denver, Austin, and Asheville to all be overrated (even though I liked both Austin and SF, I just didn't like them as much as other people seemed to think I should).

Gotta disagree on Chicago though. I've only been once, but I absolutely loved it there.
And thats the definition of overrated.
Remove Denver from your list and mine would match yours. I actually like Denver more than I expected I would. Seattle too. But Austin, SF, Portland... were nice places but I didn't find them as glorious as others seemed to think I should like them.

Chicago, NY, etc were right on target

and places like Detroit, Denver, etc were better than I expected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2013, 04:03 PM
 
3,345 posts, read 3,073,982 times
Reputation: 1725
Huffington Post?

I would say the most overrated cities would be NYC, Miami, Orlando, Chicago,

Most underrated would be Pittsburgh, Louisville, Milwaukee and Cleveland
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2013, 06:39 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,695,817 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
I've been to Vancouver, SF, Chicago, and Denver.

Out of those 4 I think only Denver is overrated as far as visiting unless you include ski resorts hours away. Vancouver is a cool place to visit but probably not for more than 4-5 days max imo. While I think SF is a tad overrated as far as a place to live it's definitely a great city to visit.
I agree that Denver isn't really a destination for visiting. However, there is a lot to do in the way of tourism depending on the time of year. I think that goes for most mid size cities in the US though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2013, 06:47 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,695,817 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Min-Chi-Cbus View Post
You're not getting it. I'm asking whether the level of carbon emissions has been reduced in the Denver area, to which I'm highly highly skeptical (mainly because I haven't yet heard of an American zero-emission city). If you have evidence that would be helpful. I'm interested in this kind of thing, and it's also a part of my career.
I can't tell you. I'm not particularly interested in this subject, but no one said it was a zero-emission city. I'm not really clear on the difference to be quit honest. All I know is the air pollution has drastically gone down over the years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top