Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-12-2014, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,760,072 times
Reputation: 4081

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsimms3 View Post
Updated independent-cab tower crane crane count for the City of SF, not the metro.

Rincon Hill
399 Fremont - 460-470 ft - 42 floors - multifamily - 1 crane
45 Lansing - 450 ft - 39 floors - multifamily - 1 crane

South Financial District (Transbay District)
350 Mission - 454 ft - 33 floors - office - 1 crane
Lumina Tower 1 - 430 ft - 43 floors - condo - 2 cranes
Lumina Tower 2 - 380 ft - 38 floors - condo - 2 cranes
535 Mission - 378 ft - 27 floors - office - 1 crane (luffing jib)
222 Second - 360 ft - 26 floors - office - 1 crane (Liebher luffing)
299 Fremont - <350 ft - 32 floors - multifamily - 1 crane

Yerba Buena / SoMa
SFMOMA expansion - <200 ft - N/A - institutional - 2 cranes (Liebher luffing)
Mosso SF - <100 ft - 10 floors - multifamily - 1 crane

Mid-Market
Hampton Inn - <200 ft - 15 floors - hotel - 1 crane
1400 Mission - <200 ft - 18 floors - multifamily - 1 crane
1321 Mission - <150 ft - 15 floors - multifamily - 1 crane
100 Van Ness - 400 ft - 28 floors - multifamily - 1 crane
St. Anthony's Dining Room / Mercy Housing - <120 ft - 10 floors - multifamily - 1 crane

Mission Bay
Arden - <200 ft - 13 floors? - multifamily - 1 crane
Sol - <200 ft - 16 floors - multifamily - 1 crane
MB188 - <200 ft - unknown - multifamily - 1 crane

Mission / Castro / Upper Market / Hayes Valley
2558 Mission - <100 ft - 8-10 floors - multifamily - 1 crane
1450 Franklin - <150 ft - 13 floors - condos - 1 crane
Avalon Bay Hayes Valley - <100 ft - 6 floors - multifamily - 1 crane
55 Laguna - <100 ft - <10 floors - multifamily - 1 crane

Elsewhere
Amero - <100 ft - 7 floors - condos - 1 crane
Chinatown Hospital Expansion - <150 ft - 8 floors - hospital - 1 crane
255 Broadway - <100 ft - 8 floors - multifamily - 1 crane


28 cab-operated tower cranes up in the city limits...


By next count I expect cranes to be taken down for 535 Mission, Amero, Mosso, and possibly 255 Broadway, but new cranes to be put up for 1400 Mission, 333 Brannan, 345 Brannan, and a potential flurry of multifamily and condo projects in various start phases around the city.

Wow, San Fran is on fire! Glad to see the city is booming.

I don't know what D.C.'s current count is. I do know that by 2015, the count will be the highest in the history of the city. We may see the count top 90-100 cranes in D.C. proper which will be just crazy! For the last 4 years, D.C. has only been building residential towers. Now D.C. is building residential towers, office towers, and hotel towers. When you get sometime next year, you need to come see this. It's pretty crazy.

I think the whole country is about to be booming and all cities seem to have a lot going on. It's really great to see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2014, 07:30 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,136,869 times
Reputation: 6338
How does SF even have the room to build this much? Are they destroying buildings to go more vertical?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2014, 08:10 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
2,079 posts, read 6,115,292 times
Reputation: 934
San Francisco in its entirety is less dense (17,867 ppsm) than Queens (21,333 ppsm), and certainly less than Manhattan (70,826 ppsm). While most of the construction is in the northeast quadrant of the city (somewhere around 30-40,000 ppsm), it is possible because there are still surface lots and non-contributing structures that can be demolished to make way for higher density.

I imagine the situation is the same in DC, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, LA, and Miami where densities are already high, but building construction continues.

Most of the new construction is infill that doesn't have a crane attached to it. Next door to me is a 6 story condo building that replaced a lower density brick structure. It will contain 39 residences and 3 retail bays, and the scaffolding is coming off of the front facade within the month. It is sandwiched between two 5-story apartment buildings, mine being one of them.

This boom is also just getting started. SF has added over 32,000 people since 2010 Census, Manhattan has added 40,000, and Atlanta added 24,000 by 2012 (2013 ACS isn't out for city limits yet, SF and Manhattan are counties). SF is by no means uncomfortably dense. People sometimes can't do New York, but very very few people can't do SF for its crowdedness. Atlanta just has a longggggggg way to go before it becomes dense, so while the city may feel quite large for those who live there (and not to say it isn't large), it's actually a lot "smaller" than other cities that hub similarly sized metro areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2014, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,923,075 times
Reputation: 7419
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsimms3 View Post
San Francisco in its entirety is less dense (17,867 ppsm) than Queens (21,333 ppsm), and certainly less than Manhattan (70,826 ppsm). While most of the construction is in the northeast quadrant of the city (somewhere around 30-40,000 ppsm), it is possible because there are still surface lots and non-contributing structures that can be demolished to make way for higher density.

I imagine the situation is the same in DC, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, LA, and Miami where densities are already high, but building construction continues.
Yeah there's room to build and sometimes there are crappy buildings nobody cares about that can go to. In Chicago, the downtown area is dense but you wouldn't believe how many open sites there are in some areas in the greater area, or sites that you could easily build on (like in the West Loop and the 1 or 2 story warehouse/factories that aren't used anymore).

Tearing down stuff - can be both good and bad depending on a few things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2014, 08:21 PM
 
1,461 posts, read 2,110,925 times
Reputation: 1036
Before AT&T Park was built there was basically nothing in the surrounding areas of what is now China Basin, Mission Bay, South Beach etc etc. Now it's a totally different world and with space left for present and future projects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2014, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,760,072 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsimms3 View Post
San Francisco in its entirety is less dense (17,867 ppsm) than Queens (21,333 ppsm), and certainly less than Manhattan (70,826 ppsm). While most of the construction is in the northeast quadrant of the city (somewhere around 30-40,000 ppsm), it is possible because there are still surface lots and non-contributing structures that can be demolished to make way for higher density.

I imagine the situation is the same in DC, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, LA, and Miami where densities are already high, but building construction continues.

Most of the new construction is infill that doesn't have a crane attached to it. Next door to me is a 6 story condo building that replaced a lower density brick structure. It will contain 39 residences and 3 retail bays, and the scaffolding is coming off of the front facade within the month. It is sandwiched between two 5-story apartment buildings, mine being one of them.

This boom is also just getting started. SF has added over 32,000 people since 2010 Census, Manhattan has added 40,000, and Atlanta added 24,000 by 2012 (2013 ACS isn't out for city limits yet, SF and Manhattan are counties). SF is by no means uncomfortably dense. People sometimes can't do New York, but very very few people can't do SF for its crowdedness. Atlanta just has a longggggggg way to go before it becomes dense, so while the city may feel quite large for those who live there (and not to say it isn't large), it's actually a lot "smaller" than other cities that hub similarly sized metro areas.

Yeah, D.C. is building mainly on car dealerships, gas stations, body shops, 2-3 story buildings, and parking lots. We are also building on air rights above freeways etc.

I agree about the crowded comment. San Fran and Washington D.C. along with Boston could all accommodate 1 million people and be fine in my humble opinion. All three cities have no choice but to build up. Boston and San Fran can stuff more people downtown which will relieve some of the low intensity residential area's in Boston and San Fran. D.C. has no choice but to start building up in low intensity neighborhood outside the core.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 05:21 PM
rah
 
Location: Oakland
3,314 posts, read 9,238,078 times
Reputation: 2538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
How does SF even have the room to build this much? Are they destroying buildings to go more vertical?
While there is a lack of enough land to keep up with the huge demand for housing, there's actually been plenty of room to build stuff, mostly through infill development that's replaced parking lots, empty lots, abandoned buildings, smaller buildings of no historical significance, etc. The only large scale development is the ongoing Mission Bay project, which replaced an old train yard and a bunch of warehouses and industrial stuff. What jsimms3 posted is just scratching the surface of what's been built in SF over the past 15 years.

Here's a list just of highrises (115+ feet/35+ meters) that have been built/started construction in SF since 2000:

2000's

1. Millennium tower ------------ 645' - 2009
2. One Rincon Hill south tower -- 640' - 2008
3. 555 Mission street ----------- 487' - 2008
4. St. Regis tower -------------- 484' - 2005
5. Infinity tower II -------------- 450' - 2009
6. JPMorgan Chase Building ------ 420' - 2002
7. The Paramount --------------- 420' - 2002
8. Infinity tower I --------------- 400' - 2008
9. Four Seasons Hotel ----------- 398' - 2001
10. 101 Second street ----------- 354' - 2000
11. InterContinental hotel -------- 340' - 2008
12. 55 Second Street ------------ 330' - 2002
13. 150 California ---------------- 330' - 2000
14. The Metropolitan I ----------- 266' - 2004
15. Bridgeview ------------------ 26 floors - 2002
16. Trinity Place building I ------- 24 floors - 2009
17. US Federal Building ---------- 234' - 2007
18. SoMa Grand ----------------- 233' - 2007
19. The Watermark -------------- 22 floors - 2006
20. The Metropolitan II ---------- 217' - 2004
21. BLŪ ------------------------- 209' - 2008
22. Argenta --------------------- 20 floors - 2008
23. The Brannan tower I --------- 18 floors - 2001
24. The Brannan tower II -------- 18 floors - 2001
25. The Brannan tower III ------- 18 floors - 2002
26. Courtyard San Francisco ----- 18 floors - 2001
27. Avalon Mission Bay I --------- 17 floors - 2003
28. Avalon Mission Bay II -------- 17 floors - 2006
29. Avalon Mission Bay III ------- 17 floors - 2009
30. Arterra --------------------- 16 floors - 2008
31. Beacon west ---------------- 16 floors - 2003
32. Beacon east ---------------- 16 floors - 2003
33. Hearst Tower --------------- 155' - 2005
34. 199 New Montgomery street - 150' - 2004
35. International Hotel ----------- 15 floors - 2005
36. Gap Building ----------------- 15 floors - 2001
37. 125 Mason Street ------------ 14 floors - 2008
38. Foundry Square I ------------ 145' - 2007
39. Foundry Square II ------------ 145' - 2003
40. Foundry Square IV ----------- 145' - 2003
41. M.H. de Young Museum ------- 144' - 2005
42. Symphony tower ------------- 130' - 2007
43. The Heritage on Fillmore ------ 13 floors - 2007
44. 10th & Mission Family Housing - 12 floors - 2009
45. 301 Mission street ------------ 12 floors - 2008
46. Moscone Center expansion ---- 115' - 2003

2010's (including under construction and site prep/demo)

1. Transbay tower ----------- 1,070' - 2014 (u/c start)
2. 181 Fremont ---------------- 802' - 2014 (u/c start)
3. One Rincon Hill north tower -- 541' - 2012 (u/c start, topped out)
4. 350 Mission ----------------- 455' - 2013 (u/c start)
5. 45 Lansing ------------------ 450' - 2013 (u/c start)
6. Lumina tower I -------------- 450' - 2013 (u/c start)
7. 399 Fremont ---------------- 440' - 2014 (u/c start)
8. 340 Fremont ---------------- 430' - 2014 (demolition)
9. Lumina tower II ------------- 400' - 2013 (u/c start)
10. 535 Mission ---------------- 378 - 2013 (u/c resumed, foundation started in 2008. Topped out)
11. Nema tower I -------------- 352' - 2014
12. 222 Second street --------- 350' - 2013 (u/c start)
13. 299 Fremont --------------- 350' - 2014 (u/c start)
14. CPMC Van Ness ------------ 260' - 2014 (demolition)
15. One Hawthorne street ------ 25 floors - 2010
16. Trinity Place building 2 ----- 22 floors - 2013
17. Trinity Place building 3 ----- 22 floors - 2014 (site prep)
18. Nema tower II ------------- 220' - 2014
19. CCSF Chinatown campus --- 216' - 2012
20. AVA ---------------------- 205' - 2013
21. 1400 Mission -------------- 200' - 2014 (u/c start)
22. SFMOMA expansion ------- 195' - 2014 (u/c start)
23. P.U.C. Headquarters ------ 181' - 2012
24. Madrone tower I ---------- 16 floors - 2012
25. Madrone tower II --------- 16 floors - 2012
26. Arden tower I ------------ 16 floors - 2013
27. Arden tower II ----------- 16 floors - 2013
28. Hampton Inn ------------- 15 floors - 2013 (u/c start, topped out)
29. Foundry Square III ------- 145' - 2014
30. 1415 Mission ------------- 14 floors - 2014 (u/c start)
31. 1285 Sutter -------------- 13 floors - 2013
32. 1450 Franklin ------------- 13 floors - 2014 (site prep)
33. Mission Bay block 13w ---- 13 floors - 2013 (u/c start)
34. 1321 Mission ------------- 11 floors - 2014 (u/c start)
35. SF General Hospital addition - 8 floors (u/c, supposed to be done in 2015, not sure when construction started. I'm pretty sure it's 35+ meters tall, despite the low floor count)

In addition to that, there are 30 approved highrises that I can think of which haven't started any work yet, 29 of which are part of the big and slow-moving Treasure Island, Hunters Point, and Park Merced redevelopment projects, which haven't started at all yet, and two of which hare having funding issues...so those ones won't be built for a while. And I guess there's always the possibility that NIMBYs kill some of them in the future.

As far as highrise proposals go, there are 36 that I know of, many of which are likely to be approved within the next couple years.

So while SF is obviously very dense, especially by American standards, I think a lot of people don't realize that it's not literally built up 100%, and there's still room to grow, mostly through infill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by rah View Post
While there is a lack of enough land to keep up with the huge demand for housing, there's actually been plenty of room to build stuff, mostly through infill development that's replaced parking lots, empty lots, abandoned buildings, smaller buildings of no historical significance, etc. The only large scale development is the ongoing Mission Bay project, which replaced an old train yard and a bunch of warehouses and industrial stuff. What jsimms3 posted is just scratching the surface of what's been built in SF over the past 15 years.

Here's a list just of highrises (115+ feet/35+ meters) that have been built/started construction in SF since 2000:

2000's

1. Millennium tower ------------ 645' - 2009
2. One Rincon Hill south tower -- 640' - 2008
3. 555 Mission street ----------- 487' - 2008
4. St. Regis tower -------------- 484' - 2005
5. Infinity tower II -------------- 450' - 2009
6. JPMorgan Chase Building ------ 420' - 2002
7. The Paramount --------------- 420' - 2002
8. Infinity tower I --------------- 400' - 2008
9. Four Seasons Hotel ----------- 398' - 2001
10. 101 Second street ----------- 354' - 2000
11. InterContinental hotel -------- 340' - 2008
12. 55 Second Street ------------ 330' - 2002
13. 150 California ---------------- 330' - 2000
14. The Metropolitan I ----------- 266' - 2004
15. Bridgeview ------------------ 26 floors - 2002
16. Trinity Place building I ------- 24 floors - 2009
17. US Federal Building ---------- 234' - 2007
18. SoMa Grand ----------------- 233' - 2007
19. The Watermark -------------- 22 floors - 2006
20. The Metropolitan II ---------- 217' - 2004
21. BLŪ ------------------------- 209' - 2008
22. Argenta --------------------- 20 floors - 2008
23. The Brannan tower I --------- 18 floors - 2001
24. The Brannan tower II -------- 18 floors - 2001
25. The Brannan tower III ------- 18 floors - 2002
26. Courtyard San Francisco ----- 18 floors - 2001
27. Avalon Mission Bay I --------- 17 floors - 2003
28. Avalon Mission Bay II -------- 17 floors - 2006
29. Avalon Mission Bay III ------- 17 floors - 2009
30. Arterra --------------------- 16 floors - 2008
31. Beacon west ---------------- 16 floors - 2003
32. Beacon east ---------------- 16 floors - 2003
33. Hearst Tower --------------- 155' - 2005
34. 199 New Montgomery street - 150' - 2004
35. International Hotel ----------- 15 floors - 2005
36. Gap Building ----------------- 15 floors - 2001
37. 125 Mason Street ------------ 14 floors - 2008
38. Foundry Square I ------------ 145' - 2007
39. Foundry Square II ------------ 145' - 2003
40. Foundry Square IV ----------- 145' - 2003
41. M.H. de Young Museum ------- 144' - 2005
42. Symphony tower ------------- 130' - 2007
43. The Heritage on Fillmore ------ 13 floors - 2007
44. 10th & Mission Family Housing - 12 floors - 2009
45. 301 Mission street ------------ 12 floors - 2008
46. Moscone Center expansion ---- 115' - 2003

2010's (including under construction and site prep/demo)

1. Transbay tower ----------- 1,070' - 2014 (u/c start)
2. 181 Fremont ---------------- 802' - 2014 (u/c start)
3. One Rincon Hill north tower -- 541' - 2012 (u/c start, topped out)
4. 350 Mission ----------------- 455' - 2013 (u/c start)
5. 45 Lansing ------------------ 450' - 2013 (u/c start)
6. Lumina tower I -------------- 450' - 2013 (u/c start)
7. 399 Fremont ---------------- 440' - 2014 (u/c start)
8. 340 Fremont ---------------- 430' - 2014 (demolition)
9. Lumina tower II ------------- 400' - 2013 (u/c start)
10. 535 Mission ---------------- 378 - 2013 (u/c resumed, foundation started in 2008. Topped out)
11. Nema tower I -------------- 352' - 2014
12. 222 Second street --------- 350' - 2013 (u/c start)
13. 299 Fremont --------------- 350' - 2014 (u/c start)
14. CPMC Van Ness ------------ 260' - 2014 (demolition)
15. One Hawthorne street ------ 25 floors - 2010
16. Trinity Place building 2 ----- 22 floors - 2013
17. Trinity Place building 3 ----- 22 floors - 2014 (site prep)
18. Nema tower II ------------- 220' - 2014
19. CCSF Chinatown campus --- 216' - 2012
20. AVA ---------------------- 205' - 2013
21. 1400 Mission -------------- 200' - 2014 (u/c start)
22. SFMOMA expansion ------- 195' - 2014 (u/c start)
23. P.U.C. Headquarters ------ 181' - 2012
24. Madrone tower I ---------- 16 floors - 2012
25. Madrone tower II --------- 16 floors - 2012
26. Arden tower I ------------ 16 floors - 2013
27. Arden tower II ----------- 16 floors - 2013
28. Hampton Inn ------------- 15 floors - 2013 (u/c start, topped out)
29. Foundry Square III ------- 145' - 2014
30. 1415 Mission ------------- 14 floors - 2014 (u/c start)
31. 1285 Sutter -------------- 13 floors - 2013
32. 1450 Franklin ------------- 13 floors - 2014 (site prep)
33. Mission Bay block 13w ---- 13 floors - 2013 (u/c start)
34. 1321 Mission ------------- 11 floors - 2014 (u/c start)
35. SF General Hospital addition - 8 floors (u/c, supposed to be done in 2015, not sure when construction started. I'm pretty sure it's 35+ meters tall, despite the low floor count)

In addition to that, there are 30 approved highrises that I can think of which haven't started any work yet, 29 of which are part of the big and slow-moving Treasure Island, Hunters Point, and Park Merced redevelopment projects, which haven't started at all yet, and two of which hare having funding issues...so those ones won't be built for a while. And I guess there's always the possibility that NIMBYs kill some of them in the future.

As far as highrise proposals go, there are 36 that I know of, many of which are likely to be approved within the next couple years.

So while SF is obviously very dense, especially by American standards, I think a lot of people don't realize that it's not literally built up 100%, and there's still room to grow, mostly through infill.
dayum.

LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 07:17 PM
 
6,843 posts, read 10,966,660 times
Reputation: 8436
Some visuals here for everyone.

Miami, present day.

Miami, projected for 2020.

How's that for infill?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2014, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,464 posts, read 5,710,417 times
Reputation: 6098
Not bad, here is a list of current construction in NYC, I only include buildings above 200ft:
I would guesstimate NYC has anywhere between 100-150 cranes.
There are about 100 other buildings over 200ft (including 12 more supertalls/new tallest residential building in the US) that are in various stages of approval, prep, and planning that are not on the list.
Quote:

SUPERTALLS

•One World Trade Center (1,776 ft.) T/O
•217 W 57th Street (1,550 ft, per latest DOB) [site prep]
•432 Park Ave. (1,398) ft U/C
•111 W. 57th St (1,350 ft) [demo]
•200 Greenwich St. Two World Trade Center (1,339 ft.) [base U/C, tower on hold]
•30 Hudson Yards North Tower (1,255 ft) [site prep]
•One Manhattan West (1,216 ft) [site prep]
•175 Greenwich St. Three World Trade Center (1,155 ft.) [U/C]
•One57 (1,005 ft.) T/O
•35 Hudson Yards - Equinox Tower (1,000 ft) [site prep]

SKYSCRAPERS

•Four World Trade Center (977 ft.) T/O
•220 Central Park South (950 ft) [site prep]
•30 Park Place – Four Seasons Hotel & Tower (937 ft.) U/C
•Two Manhattan West (935+ ft) [ prep]
•Brookfield Manhattan West Tower C (900* ft) [prep]
•10 Hudson Yards - Coach Building (895 ft) U/C
•56 Leonard Street (821 ft) U/C
•50 West Street (782 ft) U/C
•250 East 57th Street (715 ft) [redesigned]
•610 Lexington Avenue (712 ft) U/C
•112 Fulton St. (680* ft) [site prep]
•605 West 42nd St (656 ft) U/C

HIGHRISES 200FT+ ONLY

•20 West 53rd Street Baccarat Hotel (610 ft) T/O
•160 W. 62nd St. Fordham Lincoln Center tower (598 ft) T/O
•Avalon 88 Willoughby St. Brooklyn (596 ft ) U/C
•5 Beekman St. (595 ft) U/C
•551 10th Ave (556 ft) [Extell residential tower]
•Hyatt Times Sq. 135 W. 45th St (555 ft) T/O
•237 W.54th St. (550* ft) T/O
•"The Hub" Brooklyn (545 ft) U/C
•616 1st Ave. (540 ft) [prep]
•43-25 Hunter St. LIC (509 ft) T/O
•303 E 51st St (504 ft) U/C
•50 UN Plaza (500* ft) T/O
•66 Rockwell Pl. (Downtown Brooklyn) 489 ft T/O
•99 Washington St. Holiday Inn (488 ft) T/O
•855 6th Ave. (480 ft) [plans reworked]
•Riverside Center Parcel 2 (480 ft) U/C
•Riverside Center Parcel 5 (480* ft) U/C
•20 W. 53rd St 45 story Hotel (480 ft) U/C
•400 Park Avenue South (476 ft) T/O
•626 1st Ave. (470 ft) [prep]
•W57 Pyramid (467 ft) U/C
•309 Fifth Ave. (452 ft) T/O
•Two Sutton Place North (443 ft) T/O
•7 Bryant (441 ft) U/C
•1 North 4th Place [formerly 3 Northside Piers] (440* ft) T/O
•City Point Brooklyn phase 2 (435* ft) U/C
•616 1st Ave. Tower 2 Con Ed site (433 ft) [site prep]
•132 W.35th St. hotel (432 ft) U/C
•136 W. 42nd St. Bush Terminal Hotel (404 ft) T/O
•Hunters Point South (400* ft x 2) T/O
•Oro II 313 Gold Street (373 ft) T/O
•160 Madison Ave. (371 ft) U/C
•461 Dean St. Atlantic Yards - 'B2' 33 fl. (360* ft) U/C
•23 E.22nd St. (351 ft) U/C
•Hunters Point South (350* ft x 2) T/O
•The Charles 1355 1st Ave. (350* ft) T/O
•Citypoint Phase II Brooklyn (350* ft ) U/C
•11 E.31st St hotel (345* ft) [prep]
•33 Beekman Pace dorms (340* ft) U/C
•113 Nassau (330* ft) T/O
•500 W 30th St (325 ft) T/O
•35XV (320* ft) T/O
•160 E. 22nd St. (310* ft) T/O
•30 Fletcher St. (300* ft) T/O
•301 E. 50th St (300* ft) U/C
•34 E.51st St. SOM office (296 ft) U/C
•19 Park Place "Tribeca Royale" (292 ft) U/C
•44-41 Purves St. LIC (285* ft) [prep]
•237 W. 54th St. (280* ft) U/C
•180 Orchard St. Hotel Indigo (276 ft) U/C
•6 Platt St. 27 story Sheraton hotel (273 ft) U/C
•451 Lexington hotel (263 ft) U/C
•46-10 Center Blvd. (250* ft) T/O
•170 Amsterdam Ave. (240* ft) U/C
•325 W 33rd St Marriott Hotel (240 ft) U/C
•240 Manhattan Ave. (235* ft) T/O
•41-50 24th St. LIC (232* ft) U/C
•Archer New York Hotel (230* ft) U/C
•30 W.46th St. Cambria Suites hotel (229 ft) U/C
•44-51 Purves St. LIC (225* ft) [prep]
•Greenwich Lane (225* ft) T/O
•1711 1st Ave. hotel (220* ft) [demo]
•Franklin Place (220* ft) U/C
•24 John St. hotel (206 ft) U/C
•The Alton Queens (200* ft) U/C
•10 Madison (200* ft) T/O

Last edited by Gantz; 04-14-2014 at 08:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top