Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-07-2013, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,824,425 times
Reputation: 2980

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynAragon View Post
I don't think people need to validate their preference for one city over another - it's often just personal taste. For instance, I prefer Fort Worth over Dallas. I could give my reasons but they'd basically boil down to the fact that Fort Worth fits my personality better.
True to a point.Having never been to either is the key difference.Especially when they are so similar options.
How do you prefer something over another if you don't know much about each place?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2013, 03:44 PM
 
81 posts, read 111,024 times
Reputation: 44
You should consider Austin.

But you should move to San Francisco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 06:20 AM
 
89 posts, read 97,207 times
Reputation: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renton13 View Post
You should consider Austin.

But you should move to San Francisco.
Is Austin quite a small town feel though? Probably smaller than Charlotte I would have thought.
Ha why do you think san fran? I don't fancy being in a high risk earthquake zone otherwise it would have been my number 1 choice
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
1,445 posts, read 2,325,760 times
Reputation: 881
Quote:
Originally Posted by London_knowledge View Post
Is Austin quite a small town feel though? Probably smaller than Charlotte I would have thought.
Ha why do you think san fran? I don't fancy being in a high risk earthquake zone otherwise it would have been my number 1 choice
Yes, Austin is smaller than Charlotte, and yes, I would say it feels smaller as well. But Austin is a cool city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2013, 04:20 PM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,824,425 times
Reputation: 2980
Quote:
Originally Posted by London_knowledge View Post
Is Austin quite a small town feel though? Probably smaller than Charlotte I would have thought.
Ha why do you think san fran? I don't fancy being in a high risk earthquake zone otherwise it would have been my number 1 choice
REALLY? Now we are on EARTHQUAKES?!!LOL>

Well Austin and Dallas are in high Tornado zones.

Tampa gets Hurricanes !

Houston has a vapid Tejano "gangster" culture you wont be able to escape with all those guitar,singers and horn players performing their music all over the city thereby causing traffic accidents by distracting drivers with their flashy Rhinestone's flashing off their bedazziling attire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2013, 04:00 AM
 
89 posts, read 97,207 times
Reputation: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by afonega1 View Post
REALLY? Now we are on EARTHQUAKES?!!LOL>

Well Austin and Dallas are in high Tornado zones.

Tampa gets Hurricanes !

Houston has a vapid Tejano "gangster" culture you wont be able to escape with all those guitar,singers and horn players performing their music all over the city thereby causing traffic accidents by distracting drivers with their flashy Rhinestone's flashing off their bedazziling attire.
Why would you not consider a high risk earthquake zone before you moved somewhere new? Are you a moron or something who doesn't think about these things?
Tornadoes you get warnings about and dallas hasnt really been hit by major ones despite being in tornado alley it hasnt had any catastrophic ones like many other cities. San fran is due a huge 8 or 9 quake and you will have no warning
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2013, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
1,445 posts, read 2,325,760 times
Reputation: 881
Quote:
Originally Posted by London_knowledge View Post
Why would you not consider a high risk earthquake zone before you moved somewhere new? Are you a moron or something who doesn't think about these things?
Tornadoes you get warnings about and dallas hasnt really been hit by major ones despite being in tornado alley it hasnt had any catastrophic ones like many other cities. San fran is due a huge 8 or 9 quake and you will have no warning
And London has been overdue for a major earthquake for a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2013, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
1,054 posts, read 1,239,308 times
Reputation: 1084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austincool View Post
And London has been overdue for a major earthquake for a while.
Your comment led me to look that up. An article I just read said the biggest earthquake that London can expect every 100 years or so is a 5.5 magnitude quake. There's a HUGE difference between that and a magnitude 8 or 9. Each increase of 1 on the Richter scale indicates an intensity 10 times stronger. A 5.5 earthquake causes relatively minor damage (according to that article). San Francisco, on the other hand, will be in mighty bad shape when the "big one" hits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2013, 09:59 AM
 
89 posts, read 97,207 times
Reputation: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillstuckinthesouth View Post
Your comment led me to look that up. An article I just read said the biggest earthquake that London can expect every 100 years or so is a 5.5 magnitude quake. There's a HUGE difference between that and a magnitude 8 or 9. Each increase of 1 on the Richter scale indicates an intensity 10 times stronger. A 5.5 earthquake causes relatively minor damage (according to that article). San Francisco, on the other hand, will be in mighty bad shape when the "big one" hits.
I agree. Ive read alot about it and youre right it will really mess up san fran. Thankfully they have built alot of buildings to withstand alot of the shock. Seattle is due a huge one too about 9 with possible tsunami threat too. I personally dont like those odds! Seattle haven't really prepared their architecture for this though.
The guy who laughed at me for taking into consideration an earthquake threat city is a moron in my opinion lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2013, 10:17 AM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 20 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,509 posts, read 44,193,031 times
Reputation: 16925
This is off the rails.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top