Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-14-2015, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,928 posts, read 6,638,998 times
Reputation: 6446

Advertisements

You include Austin, but not Houston and DFW.... Hmmmm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-14-2015, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,523 posts, read 33,582,777 times
Reputation: 12162
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
You include Austin, but not Houston and DFW.... Hmmmm
Houston and DFW is part of the etc. he is talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,928 posts, read 6,638,998 times
Reputation: 6446
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello View Post
Here is how I, personally, would categorize the Southern Metro's in no order within their groups:

The Big Four - the international metro areas of the South, they transcend simply being Southern, they are Global

Miami
Houston
Dallas
Atlanta

The Reigional Capitals - more provencial than the big four with not as much of a presence on the Global stage, but very important to their regions:

Charlotte
Raleigh
Nashville
Austin
San Antonio
New Orleans
Memphis
Oklahoma City

If you want to know which would be next to be part of the "New South", probably one of the above.
Agreed. To make this fun, lets talk the bigs of each region.

Northest
-New York City
-Boston
-Philadelphia
-DC
-Baltimore

Midwest
-Chicago
-Detroit
-Minneapolos/St Paul
-Milwaukee

West
-Los Angeles
-San Francisco
-Seattle
-Phoenix
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Florida
2,232 posts, read 2,123,011 times
Reputation: 1910
Quote:
Originally Posted by _OT View Post
If anything, outside of transplants, Birmingham, Memphis and Louisville are the only cities in the South that have anything of a Midwest feel, and in vice-versa (Detroit, St. Louis, Kansas City, Indianapolis).
How in earth does Birmingham or Memphis have Midwestern elements??? Louisville sure but Birmingham and memphis????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:01 AM
 
37,898 posts, read 42,033,653 times
Reputation: 27294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happiness-is-close View Post
How in earth does Birmingham or Memphis have Midwestern elements??? Louisville sure but Birmingham and memphis????
Only from the standpoint of having a history of heavy industry can Birmingham be said to have Midwestern elements. Outside of that, no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:03 AM
 
37,898 posts, read 42,033,653 times
Reputation: 27294
Quote:
Originally Posted by FJB327 View Post
Thanks for proving my point!!

First, CD isnt a scientific poll and who knows if they were all texans. Most importantly, "the south" was voted on by 93 people. 90 other ppl classified TX as: Cant be classified, southwest, midwest, or western.

Your only rebuttal has made my case stronger. Now do a poll on GA, AR, LA, MS, SC, TN, and NC. I bet you won't have close to 50% of respondents calling the states region anything besides "the south."

Again, try actually living here before you try and tell a Texas resident what his state is classified as.
Knock yourself out in that thread. At the end of the day, DFW, Nashville, and Raleigh are already widely regarded as New South metros so saying they're the "next" New South metros is pretty silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Arlington
641 posts, read 803,403 times
Reputation: 720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
Knock yourself out in that thread. At the end of the day, DFW, Nashville, and Raleigh are already widely regarded as New South metros so saying they're the "next" New South metros is pretty silly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Houston and DFW is part of the etc. he is talking about.

OP didn't include DFW. I can see why he didn't include Houston. I wouldn't call it a "new" south metro. But DFW metro on the other hand is new. FW had 300k ppl less than 20 years ago, its close to 1M now.

And no, Nashville, DFW, and Raleigh aren't "widely regarded" which is why I added them. How am I suppose to read OP's mind to know what "etc" means to him. Widely regarded south metros to me for someone who includes TX and FL in their definition of South are ATL,MIA,HOU. He already included one of those three. Nashville, DFW, Raleigh are new as in last 20 years, tremendous growth. I only include DFW because FW is now a city that can stand on it's own and compete. It's no longer looked at as a suburb of Dallas. You are obsessed with refuting every opinion I have without giving convincing reasons to change my opinion. The only one was GT being prestigious which I discovered after a little research of my own. I owned up to that mistake, SMU is prestigious, just not as much. It also has a presidential library. How much more prestigious can you get than that. Honest mistake on my part
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Arlington
641 posts, read 803,403 times
Reputation: 720
Okay, not counting anything under 1M MSA population as an already established "new south" metro:

My vote goes to Greensboro-Winston-High Point area of NC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 01:22 PM
 
2,823 posts, read 4,499,556 times
Reputation: 1804
Raleigh/Durham might be a smaller metro, but it's about as New South as you can get. Seriously, just visit the immediate surroundings of Research Triangle Park and get back to me.

Greensboro/Winston-Salem is New South to a lesser extent. That area is slowly growing but I don't see it exploding in the near future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
1,535 posts, read 2,376,414 times
Reputation: 1604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happiness-is-close View Post
How in earth does Birmingham or Memphis have Midwestern elements??? Louisville sure but Birmingham and memphis????
This is a rarity, I agree with you on this one, Mem and BHM Midwest feeling, LMAO>>>>>>>>>>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top