Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Cities With the Highest Quality of Life in North America
New York CIty 6 4.69%
Toronto 11 8.59%
San Francisco 5 3.91%
Boston 14 10.94%
Chicago 20 15.63%
Montreal 9 7.03%
Vancouver 28 21.88%
Seattle 22 17.19%
Philadelphia 8 6.25%
Houston 5 3.91%
Voters: 128. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-17-2017, 08:30 PM
 
Location: BC Canada
984 posts, read 1,313,779 times
Reputation: 1455

Advertisements

Vancouver has a lot to offer the outdoor enthusiast and is a very likeable place. When considering the city though you must consider the cost of living, it's oppressive. The wages are low, rents the highest in the country, outrageous real estate prices where the average SFH is a whopping 80% more expensive than Toronto, highest gas prices in NA, and a horrid highway system that makes commuting a painfully slow experience. Conversely it does have a very good transit system for it's size.

Besides the outrageous cost of living, Vancouver also has a reputation across Canada as being a bit of a bore. It's a very quiet early-to-bed kind of city with little in the way of arts or culture and the place is rather sterile and compared to Toronto or Montreal, just a small town with a small town attitude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-17-2017, 08:35 PM
 
4,087 posts, read 3,239,801 times
Reputation: 3058
Chicago's boom in residential high-rises and skyscrapers is vast majority apartments too. The Condo craze past there too. But of course still some and those from past years. Chicago also has strict construction codes. Always did as its Great Fire lead to changes that even prevented NYC-style tenements from being built. Row-housing was some high-end but not for its blue-collar neighborhoods. They got unattached-homes and once the gilded-age ended. Row-housing did too there. By the 1920s the Chicago Craftsman Bungalow (Architect Frank Lloyd Wright inspired) became the standard home for the evolving middle-class with areas of Apartment buildings and 2-3 Flat homes.

Chicago keeps getting brought in by some Canadians ..... comments on Parks too. I already posted pictures. But to note its ongoing 1909 Plan a couple more as Chicago's lakefront parkland, harbors and beaches including downtown..... speaks for itself.

Its 1909 Burnham Plan to restore its lakefront ongoing still as much was realized and the Chicago river now too. The islands were not .... but peninsulas were and more.

Last edited by DavePa; 05-01-2018 at 07:25 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2017, 08:47 PM
 
Location: The Heart of Dixie
10,211 posts, read 15,914,912 times
Reputation: 7195
These criteria are way too subjective. What's considered a good quality is nice is based on personal preferences. None of these cities have a good quality of life IMHO. I honestly, based on my personal prefernces, think that Baton Rouge, Louisiana and Charleston, West Virginia have a better quality of life.

I don't care much for bike lanes, transit oriented development, etc. But things I do like lower density, lower taxes, affordable housing that's not in the ghetto etc. For me a good quality of life is a house in the country with a lot of land or living in a suburban neighborhood with detached homes, local swimming pools, etc or in gated communities. Some people prefer to drive their own car and live somewhere where all parking is free and there are no tolls on the highways too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2017, 10:06 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,851,017 times
Reputation: 8651
Wow, everything you said is the opposite of what I want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2017, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Unhappy Valley, Oregon
1,083 posts, read 1,035,170 times
Reputation: 1941
Minneapolis-St. Paul would be my vote if it were listed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2017, 03:18 PM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,957,035 times
Reputation: 9226
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornsnicker3 View Post
Minneapolis-St. Paul would be my vote if it were listed
Minneapolis is a nice city with good amenities, but help me understand what sets its quality of life apart from say, Denver or DFW? . Minneapolis has a great economy but it’s not super cheap, offers third-tier (that’s not an insult) amenities and what most would consider an awful climate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2017, 07:38 AM
 
Location: Unhappy Valley, Oregon
1,083 posts, read 1,035,170 times
Reputation: 1941
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Minneapolis is a nice city with good amenities, but help me understand what sets its quality of life apart from say, Denver or DFW? . Minneapolis has a great economy but it’s not super cheap, offers third-tier (that’s not an insult) amenities and what most would consider an awful climate.
Minneapolis-St Paul, in my opinion, wins with the intangibles and cost of living. Minnesotans are classically friendly and helpful (think "Minnesota Nice"); educated; healthy (Minnesota ranks 4th recently); active; and politically involved (Minnesota has the highest voter participation).

In comparison with Denver:
-Cost of living is quite a bit lower than Denver (I have lived in the metro area and it was awfully expensive when I lived there).
-Traffic and roads are noticeably cruddier in Denver. The prevalence of non-native Coloradans (*cough* Californians) worsens winter driving.
-People in Denver are socially lukewarm. They are more laid-back in Denver, but not particularly nice or helpful. They are definitely nicer than easterners, but they lack the Midwestern niceness or Southern charm.
-Public schools are better in Minnesota.


Dallas is definitely cheaper and Texans have the Texan charm, but the other criteria is definitely lower (health, activity, etc.).

Weather is a mixed bag because it depends on what you like. Obviously, if a mild, coastal Mediterranean climate is your ideal, Minneapolis has awful weather. If you like seasons, snow, and cold, Minneapolis is tolerable. I love the climate in Duluth, but I am not "most people".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2017, 11:20 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
398 posts, read 381,829 times
Reputation: 501
I’d probably go with Chicago or Toronto but I’d also add Pittsburgh to the mix. Insanely low rent there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2017, 09:55 AM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,957,035 times
Reputation: 9226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codederick View Post
I’d probably go with Chicago or Toronto but I’d also add Pittsburgh to the mix. Insanely low rent there.
I live in Pittsburgh, and believe it offers a really good quality of life, (top-10 if you factor COL) but I still think Chicago is a better value proposition. I would be in Chicago right now, if my wife could find a job there. Unfortunately, she has a hyper-specific career (think planetarium director or offensive line coach), and there’s never more than one or two job openings in the country, at any given time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2017, 04:48 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,593,729 times
Reputation: 7477
Political and social environment: Vancouver
Economic environment: San Francisco
Socio-cultural environment: Houston
Medical and health considerations: Vancouver
Schools and education: Toronto. If we're talking higher education only than Chicago
Public services and transportation: Toronto
Recreation: NYC
Consumer goods: Vancouver
Housing: Philadelphia
Natural environment: Vancouver
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top