Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'd actually give the edge to Odessa. Huntsville has a very modest, quieter downtown for its size. You'd think it would be a bit bigger and more active. They need to develop a couple of 200-300 foot high rises downtown, and have it built it up a bit.
Milwaukee, WI or Baltimore, MD?
Baltimore due to greater density. It is basically Cincinnati without the hills. Milwaukee could use some new towers.
I like St Paul's much more than Virginia Beach. Both are surprisingly pretty good though.
Denver, CO or Minneapolis, MN?
Mountains give Denver a Boost, But Minneapolis has more Stand Out and Varied Architecture, Denver's Architecture is Just Ok, not that inspiring and also not a huge fan of the "cash register" tower in Denver, They're About Equal in Density However, Minneapolis has made better choices with it's towers
Louisville is better. The buildings have more presence and are classically beautiful. Louisville needs more buildings, though.
Salt Lake City, UT or Columbus, OH?
I like Salt Lake City overall, better. The buildings are more unique and a bit more attractive overall. Add in SLC's beautiful mountain backdrop and it elevates it even more. Plus SLC is building several more skyscrapers that will continue to add to its height and density.
Columbus has a nice base of towers, and a good amount too, with about 17 or 18 (if I recall correctly) over 300 feet. But it needs more density and more architecturally unique buildings. The buildings are a bit too bland and stale designed.
I like Salt Lake City overall, better. The buildings are more unique and a bit more attractive overall. Add in SLC's beautiful mountain backdrop and it elevates it even more. Plus SLC is building several more skyscrapers that will continue to add to its height and density.
Columbus has a nice base of towers, and a good amount too, with about 17 or 18 (if I recall correctly) over 300 feet. But it needs more density and more architecturally unique buildings. The buildings are a bit too bland and stale designed.
Columbus, OH or Indianapolis, IN?
Columbus, OH looks larger and more new buildings. Both cities are underwhelming for their size.
Columbus, OH looks larger and more new buildings. Both cities are underwhelming for their size.
Orlando, FL or Reno, NV?
I have to give Orlando the win here, since it's more dense. And how its buildings look like by that lake(sorry I don't know the name of it), and same with the fountain within that same lake(not to forget that fountain glows in colors, at night), makes me prefer Orlando. I like the mountain backdrop for Reno, but this city needs 1) a LOT more buildings, and 2) a lot more density. And due to the lack of buildings and density, I can't give Reno the win here.
A new skyline battle that I don't think has ever been brought up here, before. Or at least if it ever once was brought up, I'm positive I've never in the past compared these 2 cities before in this thread: Bellingham, WA, or Juneau, AK?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
