Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Gotta give the edge to Louisville. The river plus bridges add to the already larger and broader skyline.
Good one here… Denver or Minneapolis?
Minneapolis, since I like the mix of old and new buildings better with this one. And the several bridges and the river, really add to this one. Denver's skyline isn't bad, but there's something about the one in Minneapolis I like more.
And back to Denver, let's try a different matchup with that one: Denver, or Calgary?
Minneapolis, since I like the mix of old and new buildings better with this one. And the several bridges and the river, really add to this one. Denver's skyline isn't bad, but there's something about the one in Minneapolis I like more.
And back to Denver, let's try a different matchup with that one: Denver, or Calgary?
Calgary. Denver's skyline is just too boxy from most angles and not very modern looking anymore whereas Calgary has a nice mix of architectural styles.
How about some more slightly more obscure ones: Rochester, MN or Fort Wayne, IN?
Calgary. Denver's skyline is just too boxy from most angles and not very modern looking anymore whereas Calgary has a nice mix of architectural styles.
How about some more slightly more obscure ones: Rochester, MN or Fort Wayne, IN?
Rochester, looks a lot more balanced. Fort Wayne has a few better looking buildings but the skyline is a little strange looking, also am not really a fan of that tallest tower, the "Indiana Michigan Power Center".
Rochester, looks a lot more balanced. Fort Wayne has a few better looking buildings but the skyline is a little strange looking, also am not really a fan of that tallest tower, the "Indiana Michigan Power Center".
Montreal, QC vs. Pittsburgh, PA?
Pittsburgh. To me I like the mix of old and new buildings there, plus the design of the bridges over a river is more attractive looking there. Also, the incline railways('funiculars', as some call those railroads up a hill) to the Mount Washington neighborhood, add to how much I slightly prefer Pittsburgh's skyline. I also remember(as someone who's been to Montreal before, and also Pittsburgh too), liking the design of the bridges over a river in Pittsburgh more.
I'm going to pick some smaller cities, this time: Evansville, IN, or Shreveport, LA?
Pittsburgh. To me I like the mix of old and new buildings there, plus the design of the bridges over a river is more attractive looking there. Also, the incline railways('funiculars', as some call those railroads up a hill) to the Mount Washington neighborhood, add to how much I slightly prefer Pittsburgh's skyline. I also remember(as someone who's been to Montreal before, and also Pittsburgh too), liking the design of the bridges over a river in Pittsburgh more.
I'm going to pick some smaller cities, this time: Evansville, IN, or Shreveport, LA?
Shreveport. Love the way it looks from across the river in Bossier City with all the older bridges. Good mix of architecture too.
This one's pretty relevant to me and is a constant point of contention among coworkers: Oklahoma City, OK or Tulsa, OK?
Pittsburgh all the way. Pittsburgh has an incredibly dense and classic skyline.
Cincinnati's is not bad, either, honestly for its size. Pittsburgh's is more graceful and balanced--and higher.
Oh and totally agree about Oklahoma City. The 840ish foot tower sticks out and makes the skyline look odd and unappealing. The tower is not that attractive, either.
OKC needs 2 or 3 more towers between 550 and 800 feet to align the balance of their skyline.
Memphis or Birmingham?
Last edited by jjbradleynyc; 05-14-2021 at 07:56 AM..
Pittsburgh all the way. Pittsburgh has an incredibly dense and classic skyline.
Cincinnati's is not bad, either, honestly for its size. Pittsburgh's is more graceful and balanced--and higher.
Oh and totally agree about Oklahoma City. The 840ish foot tower sticks out and makes the skyline look odd and unappealing. The tower is not that attractive, either.
OKC needs 2 or 3 more towers between 550 and 800 feet to align the balance of their skyline.
Memphis or Birmingham?
Memphis. Looks bigger and more dense. Houston or Los Angeles?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
