Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What are the Fastest Paced Cities (After New York)??
Los Angeles 34 12.45%
Chicago 67 24.54%
Washington D.C. 60 21.98%
Boston 24 8.79%
San Francisco 17 6.23%
Philadelphia 35 12.82%
Atlanta 12 4.40%
Miami 7 2.56%
Houston 3 1.10%
Las Vegas 14 5.13%
Voters: 273. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2017, 09:40 PM
 
Location: 78745
4,503 posts, read 4,613,441 times
Reputation: 8006

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwguy2 View Post
As I posted earlier, Las Vegas has a small zone of "fast pace". This is generally from the airport to the strip. The rest of the city, which is mostly residential, is just normal neighborhoods with little pace.

Downtown Vegas is actually very smallish compared to other metros of similar size. Yes, there are casinos in the Fremont Experience, but the general area is smallish compared to other metros, and is completely overpowered by Las Vegas Boulevard (the strip).
All i ever seen of Las Vegas is Fremont Street downtown and from the airport to the Strip, and the road that goes to Hoover Dam and on down to Laughlin, so that's all I ever seen of Las Vegas and its constantly busy. Even the slowest time of a 24 hour day, 4am to 5am, it's busy. I don't know of any other city in the country that is constantly as busy as the Strip and Fremont Street, with the possible exception of New Yoyk City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2017, 09:42 PM
 
Location: 78745
4,503 posts, read 4,613,441 times
Reputation: 8006
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwguy2 View Post
As I posted earlier, Las Vegas has a small zone of "fast pace". This is generally from the airport to the strip. The rest of the city, which is mostly residential, is just normal neighborhoods with little pace.

Downtown Vegas is actually very smallish compared to other metros of similar size. Yes, there are casinos in the Fremont Experience, but the general area is smallish compared to other metros, and is completely overpowered by Las Vegas Boulevard (the strip).
All i ever seen of Las Vegas is Fremont Street downtown and from the airport to the Strip, and the road that goes to Hoover Dam and on down to Laughlin, so that's all I ever seen of Las Vegas and its constantly busy. Even the slowest time of a 24 hour day, 4am to 5am, it's busy. I don't know of any other city in the country that is constantly as busy as the Strip and Fremont Street, with the possible exception of Times Squsre in New Yoyk City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2017, 10:19 PM
 
Location: Manhattan!
2,272 posts, read 2,220,070 times
Reputation: 2080
Quote:
Originally Posted by That_One_Guy View Post
I'm surprised at all the people saying LA.

That's not the impression I got at all when I was there.
^^^^^ Earlier I said that, but now I'm even more surprised by all the people saying Vegas (didn't even notice as an option). I've been to Vegas a few times already, and I really love Vegas, but everytime I'm there I feel like everything takes soooo long. Simple things like ordering a drink, coffee, slice of pizza, or general cashier check out. Even on the strip, maybe with the exception of bartenders at some of the bigger clubs. And people walk really slow there too.

I don't think busy always means fast paced. In Vegas the strip usually is busy but people aren't in a rush. People are out enjoying themselves, drinking on the street, getting drunk... at all times of the day, usually on their way to some sort of party or show or something. The difference is that people you see on the vegas strip are on vacation letting loose and having fun. Fast paced is more "I'm running late for work **** everybody and everything in my way", "**** I have a train to catch in 10 minutes", people forcing themselves into crowded trains, or having long lines everywhere, but they move quickly. Fast-paced is don't stop moving suddenly or people will bump into you. Don't look down at your phone too long without pulling over to the side, and do not point randomly at things without looking or you will clothesline a bunch of people and smack someone in the face. Also it usually can be felt at your job in some way, whatever it is that you do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 09:25 AM
 
2,563 posts, read 3,626,477 times
Reputation: 3434
Chicago and DC, maybe Philly and SF. For those touting LA, it's not fast -paced. It just isn't. Seems like a sleepy town compared to Chicago or DC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 09:53 AM
 
Location: DMV Area
1,296 posts, read 1,218,629 times
Reputation: 2616
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMatl View Post
Atlanta is a very mixed bag. The freeways are almost manic at times, I avoid them and much prefer driving the freeways in L.A., believe it or not. The very heart of Downtown around Peachtree Center is fast during the week, particularly at rush hours and around lunchtime. Ditto for Midtown around Colony Square.

The rest of the City is basically a collection of streetcar neighborhoods with their own 'villages,' and the pace is slow and mellow. We like it this way.
LA's freeways are often too crowded with traffic for truly insane drivers to make any leeway. Southern Californians also have much better road manners than people in Atlanta do. They drive fast, but cautiously, almost never tailgate and tend to use their turn signals a lot more. When I lived in Atlanta, I routinely found myself driving the freeways at 75-80 MPH and still getting passed by motorists. That never happened when I lived in LA.

I agree that LA's neighborhoods don't have that intimate streetcar suburb feel that much of Atlanta has. The grid pattern of the main arterials, plus their width prevent that from happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 09:58 AM
 
Location: DMV Area
1,296 posts, read 1,218,629 times
Reputation: 2616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivory Lee Spurlock View Post
All i ever seen of Las Vegas is Fremont Street downtown and from the airport to the Strip, and the road that goes to Hoover Dam and on down to Laughlin, so that's all I ever seen of Las Vegas and its constantly busy. Even the slowest time of a 24 hour day, 4am to 5am, it's busy. I don't know of any other city in the country that is constantly as busy as the Strip and Fremont Street, with the possible exception of Times Squsre in New Yoyk City.
You have a very limited exposure to Las Vegas. Once you get away from the Strip, Vegas is not busy or fast-paced at all. And as That One Guy said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by That_One_Guy View Post
^^^^^ Earlier I said that, but now I'm even more surprised by all the people saying Vegas (didn't even notice as an option). I've been to Vegas a few times already, and I really love Vegas, but everytime I'm there I feel like everything takes soooo long. Simple things like ordering a drink, coffee, slice of pizza, or general cashier check out. Even on the strip, maybe with the exception of bartenders at some of the bigger clubs. And people walk really slow there too.

I don't think busy always means fast paced. In Vegas the strip usually is busy but people aren't in a rush. People are out enjoying themselves, drinking on the street, getting drunk... at all times of the day, usually on their way to some sort of party or show or something. The difference is that people you see on the vegas strip are on vacation letting loose and having fun. Fast paced is more "I'm running late for work **** everybody and everything in my way", "**** I have a train to catch in 10 minutes", people forcing themselves into crowded trains, or having long lines everywhere, but they move quickly. Fast-paced is don't stop moving suddenly or people will bump into you. Don't look down at your phone too long without pulling over to the side, and do not point randomly at things without looking or you will clothesline a bunch of people and smack someone in the face. Also it usually can be felt at your job in some way, whatever it is that you do.
...busy does not mean "fast paced." People visiting Las Vegas are there to party, not to handle business in the same sense as DC, Chicago, and New York are. If Las Vegas is "fast-paced," so is New Orleans. AFAIK, Most drunk people aren't in a hurry either
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 10:21 AM
 
232 posts, read 189,684 times
Reputation: 411
I had to make a road trip form Boston to DC not long ago. Boston is relatively fast paced, especially yhte drivers. But once we arrived in Manhattan the pace is almost chaotic. There is no place quite like it in North America. When we arrive in DC the pace seemed so slow after NYC till it almost felt like a small town. I know that DC and Boston are not that slow but NYC made all these cities feel very slow to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Northeast states
14,053 posts, read 13,929,555 times
Reputation: 5198
Seattle, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Philly, Boston, Miami Brickwell and South Beach, Las Vegas Strip
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,700,318 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigLake View Post
Chicago and DC, maybe Philly and SF. For those touting LA, it's not fast -paced. It just isn't. Seems like a sleepy town compared to Chicago or DC.
Although that's not true, I don't see what's wrong with a slower paced city? A less stressful environment with less worries >>>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 01:43 PM
 
Location: DMV Area
1,296 posts, read 1,218,629 times
Reputation: 2616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Although that's not true, I don't see what's wrong with a slower paced city? A less stressful environment with less worries >>>
No one said anything was "wrong" with it. Just an observation about how LA compares to Chicago and DC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top