Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: London vs San Francisco
London 39 62.90%
San Francisco 23 37.10%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2009, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by IT6 View Post
According to Forbes, London has 28 billionaires and San Francisco has 12. LOL.
Actually the Bay Area have over 40 and the UK has a less. LOL

Quote:
And don't even bring up San Jose/Bay Area/Whatever because hundreds world's billionaires own property in London since it's a far more international destination.
In other words, London's elite are very transient and don't really live there.

Hillarious.

Quote:
There is no place in cheap San Francisco that can match places like Kensington.
And Greater London's Per Capita GDP is poor by Bay Area standards.

 
Old 09-26-2009, 11:58 AM
IT6
 
37 posts, read 146,366 times
Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post

In other words, London's elite are very transient and don't really live there.

Hillarious.
Yes, London is surrounded and has easy access to places like Paris/Monaco/Switzerland and is in a centralized location..and San Francisco is surrounded by......Bakersfield? San Diego? LOL. London attracts the world's best and greatest hence the much higher property prices. The only people who care about and desire to purchase property in San Francisco live in the area.

San Francisco has 12 billionaires, London has 28. London is very expensive, San Francisco is cheap. London is the world's Financial Capital.
 
Old 09-26-2009, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
Originally Posted by IT6 View Post
Yes, London is surrounded and has easy access to places like Paris/Monaco/Switzerland
In other words you have to leave town to enjoy natural beauty, wonderful weather and beautiful people.

I just walk outside, Ah!

Quote:
London attracts the world's best and greatest hence the much higher property prices.
Actually without even looking Im positive that London is less educated than San Francisco.

Quote:
The only people who care about and desire to purchase property in San Francisco live in the area.
Yes, our 40+ Billionaires who don't need the approval of stuffy eurotrash to feel important.
 
Old 09-26-2009, 12:03 PM
IT6
 
37 posts, read 146,366 times
Reputation: 27
Also, San Francisco is one of the only major western United States cities with a reversed East -------> West migration trend.

More people in SF move to NYC, Chicago and Los Angeles than the other way around. Maybe Boston and Washington can be added to that list as well. I guess it isn't that great afterall, Montclair? LOL. As I've said, SF is simply a city people pass through. No sense of community, nobody cares.

And London has more billionaires. And more billionaire residents from multiple countries. Homes in London sell for 100 million pounds (or $175,000,000 USD). Nothing like that could happen in San Francisco.
 
Old 09-26-2009, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
Originally Posted by IT6 View Post
Also, San Francisco is one of the only major western cities with a reversed East -------> West migration trend.

More people in SF move to NYC, Chicago and Los Angeles than the other way around.
*yawns* Im dealing with a sophomore.

Quote:

The City by the Bay outshined the rest of the field in attracting alumni from the nation's top schools. More of the class of 1998 from Harvard, Stanford, Rice, Princeton, Duke and Northwestern picked San Francisco (http://www.forbes.com/afxnewslimited/feeds/afx/2008/06/24/afx5146141.html?partner=lingospot - broken link) as home, 10 years out of school, compared with any other metro.

Best Cities For Young Professionals - Forbes.com
Do your eyes hurt?
 
Old 09-26-2009, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
And London has more billionaires! And more billionaire residents from multiple countries. Homes in London sell for 100 million pounds (or $175,000,000 USD). Nothing like that could happen in San Francisco.
Larry Ellison's mansion in Woodside is worth $170 Million.

*yawns* This is getting boring.
 
Old 09-26-2009, 12:14 PM
IT6
 
37 posts, read 146,366 times
Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
*yawns* Im dealing with a sophomore.



Do your eyes hurt?
LOL, what does that have to do with the fact that more people in San Francisco move to New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles (and maybe Boston and Washington DC) than the other way around? Absolutely nothing. Why do people run out of SF in droves? Stop trying to hide behind irrelevant information. I know the truth hurts - specifically that pesky one that shows SF's strange migration patterns.

Back to the topic ; London is better than SF. London is the premier Financial Capital of the World, London is more expensive, London is more upscale, London is more diverse, London is more desirable.

London could be considered the Capital of the World.
 
Old 09-26-2009, 12:19 PM
IT6
 
37 posts, read 146,366 times
Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Larry Ellison's mansion in Woodside is worth $170 Million.

*yawns* This is getting boring.
And Buckingham Palace is valued at $2 Billion.

Nobody would drop $170 Million on anything in SF. It's not on that level no matter what an appraisal said. Nice try Montclair18.
 
Old 09-26-2009, 12:40 PM
 
5,969 posts, read 9,557,279 times
Reputation: 1614
London, I consider it the ultimate European city.
 
Old 09-26-2009, 12:54 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,500,336 times
Reputation: 5879
London is the better city, and if I were limited to just the cities proper I would pick London... would rather live in the bay area though...

weather, ocean, wine region, beaches, redwoods, mountains, geography is all better than what is around london.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top