Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Dallas Versus Philadelphia: Which City Is More Important? Which City Would You Prefer To Live In?
DALLAS 143 33.89%
PHILADELPHIA 239 56.64%
TOO CLOSE TO CALL 11 2.61%
DON'T KNOW 4 0.95%
DON'T CARE 25 5.92%
Voters: 422. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-18-2013, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,943,060 times
Reputation: 8365

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello View Post
Tornadoes, ok.

Killer Bees? Ridiculous. I can't remember the last time I even saw a bee.

Uhh yeah, I'd be more worried about the current decimation of bees.

Scientists discover what’s killing the bees and it’s worse than you thought – Quartz
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-18-2013, 03:33 PM
 
63 posts, read 133,086 times
Reputation: 144
Philly has fallen to 4th-city status on the East Coast (I would argue it has been there awhile). Additionally, it has been passed in population by the DFW area and has a 15% smaller GMP. It has the lowest projected population and economic growth over the next 30 years of all the major East Coast metros.

I only comment because this thread was ressurected from a three-year hiatus (oddly by droll midwesterners who fear bees more than violent crimes) and perhaps there was an honest debate in 2010. Since that last post, DFW's population has increased by 275,000 - and Philadelphia's by 40,000. I think we can stop debating "importance" and focus more on "where to live" now. Most people vote with their feet.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,565,329 times
Reputation: 12157
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryBTL View Post
Oh yeah it is only my imagination..
Bees Attack, Kill Two Horses In Pantego « CBS Dallas / Fort Worth

a bit further away but still..
Man Dies By Killer Bee Attack « CBS Dallas / Fort Worth

Can post more if you all would like? The reality is they are there and it IS a problem.
I said less than rare. You could go your entire life without coming face to face with some killer bees living in Texas. You have a better chance of getting killed by a rabid dog.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 13,006,897 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darien_Rod View Post
Philly has fallen to 4th-city status on the East Coast (I would argue it has been there awhile). Additionally, it has been passed in population by the DFW area and has a 15% smaller GMP. It has the lowest projected population and economic growth over the next 30 years of all the major East Coast metros.

Since that last post, DFW's population has increased by 275,000 - and Philadelphia's by 40,000. I think we can stop debating "importance" and focus more on "where to live" now. Most people vote with their feet.....
You know that is extremely misleading. The Philly MSA has about 50% less land area, so it's not really comparable to the DFW with an MSA size of 10,000 sq. miles. Even the Philly CSA(7,000 sq. miles) has a smaller land area than the Dallas MSA but has a population of over 7 million people. When looking at every other population metric, Philly usually has the larger population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,758,146 times
Reputation: 10592
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
You know that is extremely misleading. The Philly MSA has about 50% less land area, so it's not really comparable to the DFW with an MSA size of 10,000 sq. miles. Even the Philly CSA(7,000 sq. miles) has a smaller land area than the Dallas MSA but has a population of over 7 million people. When looking at every other population metric, Philly usually has the larger population.
Do you realize that of those 9,000 (not 10,000) square miles, 6,500 square miles of that is farmland and small towns? 3,500 square miles account for 5.9 million of the people in the DFW area.

Philly posters are unusually blind to this fact (sans kidphilly).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 04:43 PM
 
33 posts, read 51,570 times
Reputation: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello View Post
Do you realize that of those 9,000 (not 10,000) square miles, 6,500 square miles of that is farmland and small towns? 3,500 square miles account for 5.9 million of the people in the DFW area.

Philly posters are unusually blind to this fact (sans kidphilly).
Philadelphia has to be taken out of any metro-like statistical comparison based on greater Trenton's omission from the Philadelphia area.

500 k people. $50 B in GDP given to NYC that rightfully should be included in Philadelphia.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
5,864 posts, read 15,250,592 times
Reputation: 6767
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
You know that is extremely misleading. The Philly MSA has about 50% less land area, so it's not really comparable to the DFW with an MSA size of 10,000 sq. miles. Even the Philly CSA(7,000 sq. miles) has a smaller land area than the Dallas MSA but has a population of over 7 million people. When looking at every other population metric, Philly usually has the larger population.
What does land area have to do with anything? Just face it. The DFW area is growing at a much faster rate than the Philadelphia area. And there's no end in site. Job growth, col, its a fun place, who knows. Lots of people are moving there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 04:55 PM
 
283 posts, read 463,971 times
Reputation: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello View Post
Do you realize that of those 9,000 (not 10,000) square miles, 6,500 square miles of that is farmland and small towns? 3,500 square miles account for 5.9 million of the people in the DFW area.
Why do you think this doesn't matter. That is exactly the point! We can play the same game with Philadelphia and say this many people only live on this much land and so on. That's not what we are trying to do. The point is that the Dallas metro is huge, and it's difficult to justify why it is so. Despite the fact that the Dallas metro is growing much faster than Philly's (and Philly's metro has a nice sustainable growth rate I think), it doesn't change the fact that there are a lot more people living around Philly than Dallas. Take a 75 to 100 mile radius around each city and Philadelphia will have a lot more people living around it. Of course this means that it is going into other metro areas (NY and Baltimore), but that is exactly in Philadelphia's advantage. It is in the middle of the Northeast Megalopolis. Metro areas have similar population, but there are more people within the Philly region. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 13,006,897 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello View Post
Do you realize that of those 9,000 (not 10,000) square miles, 6,500 square miles of that is farmland and small towns? 3,500 square miles account for 5.9 million of the people in the DFW area.

Philly posters are unusually blind to this fact (sans kidphilly).
I could make the same case for the Pinelands with is over 1000 sq. miles.

It still doesn't change the fact that the Dallas MSA is still much larger land area. Why are you trying get around that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 13,006,897 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pennsgrant View Post
Philadelphia has to be taken out of any metro-like statistical comparison based on greater Trenton's omission from the Philadelphia area.

500 k people. $50 B in GDP given to NYC that rightfully should be included in Philadelphia.

Exactly. Many people who have never lived in this area have a hard time understanding the true complexities of this region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top