Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which of these is the most futuristic city?
Dallas 39 17.03%
Houston 30 13.10%
Atlanta 37 16.16%
Las Vegas 41 17.90%
Los Angeles 30 13.10%
Phoenix 12 5.24%
Charlotte 11 4.80%
Miami 29 12.66%
Voters: 229. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-24-2010, 04:27 AM
 
185 posts, read 733,961 times
Reputation: 102

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
^

That last shot is amazing! Kinda looks like Uptown Houston in a way...only without the water of course.
That is actually a combination of the Miami skyline and the South Beach skyline as seen from out at sea.

Anyway, let me try to make my point a little better here. Even though most of Miami's skyscrapers were built in the 21st century, it is not only for looks that I chose Miami in spite of its mass transit system which certainly could be better. Many people knock Miami's new skyline and current 3rd largest skyline in the U.S. status because so many of our new skyscrapers are giant condos or mixed-use projects, but getting more people to LIVE VERTICALLY LIKE THE JETSONS is the wave of the future, especially with the planet's ever growing population and urban sprawl encroaching more upon the natural environment. People living in the sky high above ground always has been a futuristic concept, but so many of you just don't get it. Giant condos and mixed-use projects in the CBD that are virtually self-contained cities unto themselves where people ideally can live, work, and play all in the same complex or all within the CBD without having to commute anywhere always has been a futuristic idea and this is where Miami is going, especially not having the mass transit system that other cities have. Our first giant condo built here in Miami was the Santa Maria in 1997 at 51 stories at 520. My first thought was "That looks like a place where the Jetsons would live and would be a great setting for a live-action movie about the Jetsons." Maybe most of you are too young to remember that cartoon series, but the futuristic concept of people living high above the ground is coming of age here in Miami, and that is what makes it futuristic. The Santa Maria is the white building with the rounded sides to the far right in this photo of mine.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-24-2010, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,788,575 times
Reputation: 2980
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumx View Post
That is actually a combination of the Miami skyline and the South Beach skyline as seen from out at sea.

Anyway, let me try to make my point a little better here. Even though most of Miami's skyscrapers were built in the 21st century, it is not only for looks that I chose Miami in spite of its mass transit system which certainly could be better. Many people knock Miami's new skyline and current 3rd largest skyline in the U.S. status because so many of our new skyscrapers are giant condos or mixed-use projects, but getting more people to LIVE VERTICALLY LIKE THE JETSONS is the wave of the future, especially with the planet's ever growing population and urban sprawl encroaching more upon the natural environment. People living in the sky high above ground always has been a futuristic concept, but so many of you just don't get it. Giant condos and mixed-use projects in the CBD that are virtually self-contained cities unto themselves where people ideally can live, work, and play all in the same complex or all within the CBD without having to commute anywhere always has been a futuristic idea and this is where Miami is going, especially not having the mass transit system that other cities have. Our first giant condo built here in Miami was the Santa Maria in 1997 at 51 stories at 520. My first thought was "That looks like a place where the Jetsons would live and would be a great setting for a live-action movie about the Jetsons." Maybe most of you are too young to remember that cartoon series, but the futuristic concept of people living high above the ground is coming of age here in Miami, and that is what makes it futuristic. The Santa Maria is the white building with the rounded sides to the far right in this photo of mine.

I may be wrong but isn't Miami proper like only 38sq miles?I mean thats nothing new when you have a confined city by natural borders,you build up.NYC,Chicago have been around way before the skycraper was invented so of course those cities look the way they do today because they basically have to bulldoze older structures to make way for the new and taller.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,824,700 times
Reputation: 7801
Detroit...perhaps after socialist/communists take over?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 12:58 PM
 
185 posts, read 733,961 times
Reputation: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by afonega1 View Post
I may be wrong but isn't Miami proper like only 38sq miles?I mean thats nothing new when you have a confined city by natural borders,you build up.NYC,Chicago have been around way before the skycraper was invented so of course those cities look the way they do today because they basically have to bulldoze older structures to make way for the new and taller.
Actually, Miami is only like 36 sq miles, so you're not really wrong there, but you are still missing the point. THE DEGREE to which SO MANY people can now LIVE VERTICALLY is what makes Miami's skyline FUTURISTIC. Then, take into account that it's mostly 21st century architecture whether you like it or not. And the fact that you can have so many balconies as high up as we have them here in Miami is a fairly recent advancement in skyscraper technology. In the past, it was thought that the increased windload created by so many balconies going so high up would tear the building apart in a storm, but now we have built many of them in Miami.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3429/...a13a7a7f_b.jpg


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 01:22 PM
 
Location: The Lakes
2,368 posts, read 5,103,988 times
Reputation: 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretzelogik View Post
Detroit...perhaps after socialist/communists take over?
Looks like somebody in this thread was dropped on their heads a few too many times as a baby

Detroit has loads of rich history, mid 20th century architecture, and an inner ring group of suburbs that change one's view of urban sprawl, with every house being unique and special. The people of Detroit preserve.

Also, quit being afraid of socialism/communism.

Here's you a futuristic skyline from a socialist country:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Houston
2,023 posts, read 4,185,767 times
Reputation: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretzelogik View Post
Detroit...perhaps after socialist/communists take over?
Dude, you need to lay off the Faux News. BTW, socialism and communism are NOT the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,983,112 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by wpmeads View Post
Dude, you need to lay off the Faux News. BTW, socialism and communism are NOT the same thing.
Its pronounced foh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,035,535 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
Dallas couldn't be outdone by Fort Worth...no way. It will be a nice looking building though.
We'll see about that, that's the best thing about living in these times, rapid changes, very little time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 06:42 PM
 
Location: Houston
2,023 posts, read 4,185,767 times
Reputation: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
Its pronounced foh.
Yes I know. It's a French word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,983,112 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmShahi View Post
We'll see about that, that's the best thing about living in these times, rapid changes, very little time.
I was just being sarcastic. Fort Worth has an Omni so Dallas had to get one. Dallas always has to have the best of everything. Its like no other city in Texas can have anything of their own without Dallas getting it too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top