Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seriously, the answer is Miami. Have any of you seen what Miami looks like? I'm surprised there aren't any flying cars swerving around the buildings in Brickell, it's like a Jetsons city.
Seriously, the answer is Miami. Have any of you seen what Miami looks like? I'm surprised there aren't any flying cars swerving around the buildings in Brickell, it's like a Jetsons city.
Miami does have a very modern appeal, but it also has miles upon miles of either slum or older subdivisions
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,034,220 times
Reputation: 4047
^^ Actually I too would have gone with something that is not an option and that is Chicago.
I disagree with New York City because it really does have way to many traditional buildings to pass off as completely futuristic. It does have large pockets of post modern buildings but the overall skyline isn't that way.
But my option is also not on the poll.
I like the Las Vegas option too, the buildings might not be tall but the are glass gleamers and futuristic in nature by that case.
^ Yes, Chicago and NY should have been on the poll. AGREED.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.