Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Columbia area
 [Register]
Columbia area Columbia - Lexington - Irmo
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2011, 10:05 PM
 
1,077 posts, read 1,657,822 times
Reputation: 475

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rophlmao View Post
The more legal weapons we have against thugs the better. That means being creative. Bust adults with them for contributing.

Ideally, their neighborhoods would be gentrified and they would be thinned out that way. Gentrification is the only way to push bad folks out of an area. Checkpoints for license and registration can choke off enemy mobility, bust DUIs, and find those with outstanding warrants. Tow ALL vehicles whose paperworks isn't straight. That way many of the criminals will be turned into pedestrians or forced to drive with others. Smart cops know a full car is up to no good and can find reasons to pull it over. Asset forfeiture is another tool. Lose enough cars and many folks won't drive into contested areas.
I'm sorry but gentrification is not the best solution. You said it will "push bad folks out of an area" and, yes it will, but at the cost of causing another area to decline. Where would you suggest they be pushed to? As more and more people move back to the city this will occur but it would only push people out farther into the suburbs. So again I ask, how is the solution to "push bad folks" out of an area help the overall problem at all and also, where would you push these people to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2011, 10:20 PM
 
5,598 posts, read 15,425,116 times
Reputation: 2789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oogax3Girl View Post
I disagree. Why does a 17 year old citizen have less of a right to be on public streets than an adult?

I don't see how the government can legally discriminate against an entire group of people. Which, it is discrimination. This law was put in place to lower crime on the assumption that 17 year olds and under are going to commit crime. Well, anyone can commit crime. It is an ageless activity.

That being said, I do wholly agree that parents shouldn't allow their children to wander the streets at such late hours, but I don't think the government has any right to enforce a law banning a group of people from a public place. If a private entity wants to do it, fine, then that's their right.
The law does discriminate. If you are younger than 18 years old, then you are considered a "minor."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2011, 04:38 AM
 
Location: WI
3,961 posts, read 11,051,340 times
Reputation: 2503
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rophlmao View Post
As far as personal security, avoid people who are poor, avoid people who don't look like you (technically not nice, but a total win in a practical sense),.
wow what a statement.... so rich kids can't be punks, only poor kids? And if you are white, you should avoid minorities? And on flip side, a black person should avoid all whites? I thought we were trying to get the world to be a place that segregation didn't exist anymore...

I may agree that a single person walking late at night should consider to avoid a group of others, but do you stop first and ask them to see their tax returns for 2010? Or confirm their racial heritage before continuing ( or running the other way )?

while you possibly had a reasonable point to try and make, at least IMO it does not come across that way... i do think the law needs to come down on any issues hard, but I sure wouldn't pin crimes on any one group alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2011, 07:10 AM
 
7,331 posts, read 15,420,312 times
Reputation: 3801
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger17 View Post
wow what a statement.... so rich kids can't be punks, only poor kids? And if you are white, you should avoid minorities? And on flip side, a black person should avoid all whites? I thought we were trying to get the world to be a place that segregation didn't exist anymore...

I may agree that a single person walking late at night should consider to avoid a group of others, but do you stop first and ask them to see their tax returns for 2010? Or confirm their racial heritage before continuing ( or running the other way )?

while you possibly had a reasonable point to try and make, at least IMO it does not come across that way... i do think the law needs to come down on any issues hard, but I sure wouldn't pin crimes on any one group alone.
Agreed. That statement was garbage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2011, 08:38 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
7,447 posts, read 7,045,865 times
Reputation: 4608
Quote:
Originally Posted by scguy89 View Post
I'm sorry but gentrification is not the best solution. You said it will "push bad folks out of an area" and, yes it will, but at the cost of causing another area to decline. Where would you suggest they be pushed to? As more and more people move back to the city this will occur but it would only push people out farther into the suburbs. So again I ask, how is the solution to "push bad folks" out of an area help the overall problem at all and also, where would you push these people to?
Just following this discussion from afar, but this reminded me of an article I read several years ago in the Atlantic about another Memphis. Seems they shut down the old housing projects and pushed the residents out to formerly quiet areas, only to later discover that the violent crime went with them:

American Murder Mystery - Magazine - The Atlantic

So I think your questions are good ones and I also think that almost every major metropolitan area is struggling with these issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2011, 02:49 AM
 
Location: Chicago
24 posts, read 56,372 times
Reputation: 22
This entire thread makes me so happy to not be living in Columbia any longer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2011, 04:10 AM
 
257 posts, read 328,888 times
Reputation: 76
You can't be serious. Somebody who now lives in CHICAGO of all places is making a statement like this? I mean seriously, you don't even have to dig hard to find incidents like this that happen on a much more regular basis in that crime-infested city:

//www.city-data.com/forum/chica...r-ogilvie.html

//www.city-data.com/forum/chica...y-weekend.html

//www.city-data.com/forum/chica...n-highest.html

And lest we forget this incident that makes the Five Points incident look like a school lunch money stickup:


YouTube - ‪Teen beaten to death caught on tape!!‬‏

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2011, 05:09 AM
 
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
13,002 posts, read 18,865,402 times
Reputation: 3148
Chicago is the poster child for what's wrong with the inner city. Gangland is it's middle name. That said, there's a lot more to Chicago than its gangs. And there's a lot more to Columbia and Greenville than their curfews in response to violence in their entertainment districts late at night by teen thugs whose parents lost control of them at age 2.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2011, 06:01 AM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,894,646 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by psychelle View Post
This entire thread makes me so happy to not be living in Columbia any longer.
You and lots of other people.

By the way, no follow-up that I've seen by the newspapers. How were the little hoodlums charged? How is Carter?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2011, 06:21 AM
 
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
13,002 posts, read 18,865,402 times
Reputation: 3148
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsupstate View Post
You and lots of other people.

By the way, no follow-up that I've seen by the newspapers. How were the little hoodlums charged? How is Carter?
You haven't been looking very hard evidently. The "lots of other people" comment was ugly, and I'm surprised a business owner in a state as small as S.C. would make habitually and obsessively disparaging one of the state's most important cities one of his life's missions. What's the name of your company?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Columbia area

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top