Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2017, 01:20 PM
 
12,883 posts, read 14,035,584 times
Reputation: 18454

Advertisements

Pregnant Woman Reportedly Denied Service At Restaurant For Wearing A Crop Top | HuffPost

A Washington woman who is 7.5 months pregnant with twins showed up to the Buzz Inn Steakhouse in Marysville wearing a black crop top that says "weirdo" and a long pink maxi skirt. She was turned away, the restaurant claiming her shirt violated their "no shirt, no shoes, no service" policy. Mom claims her outfit violated the health code, but the restaurant didn't appear to make that argument. Mom's livid and feels as if she's been body-shamed. If you watch the video there is a photo of her outfit that night.

I don't think her outfit is appropriate in general, not just for a restaurant or a pregnant person but for someone her age to be wearing out in public at all. But I do wonder if a slim teenager would have been turned away for wearing the same; despite what the restaurant claims, I have a feeling she wouldn't have been.

Anyway, the restaurant issued an apology. I'm curious what others think about this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2017, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Hawaii/Alabama
2,271 posts, read 4,135,924 times
Reputation: 6617
As an older female I think the outfit described is inappropriate for a pregnant female. That being said, I think that as long as her outfit covered what legally needed to be covered it is her right to wear what she is comfortable in and what makes her feel good.

I also think that if she had been slim, it would not have been an issue. If she was not cooking or serving in the restaurant, and as her breasts were covered then she most certainly was wearing a shirt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2017, 02:35 PM
 
Location: Florida
3,398 posts, read 6,099,741 times
Reputation: 10287
People will do anything for media attention these days.

Weird how 99.99999% of pregnant women can go out without any issues or raising a fuss but that one wants to be special.

But that's the society we live in today. Go out looking/acting like a fool, get treated like a fool then try to play the victim card through the media/social media.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2017, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Dessert
10,928 posts, read 7,464,118 times
Reputation: 28157
Back in MY day, decent pregnant women wore loose clothing to disguise their distended bellies.
Hussies today flaunt it in our faces. (saw a very pregnant woman in a bikini at the beach the other day).
(note: this is sarcasm)

I think part of my distaste for the exposed belly is my own body issues; it looks like fat, I wouldn't want to show my fat belly , how can she?

I guess I'd better get used to it, because customs change!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2017, 03:16 PM
 
9,445 posts, read 6,602,839 times
Reputation: 18898
That crop top doesn't really qualify as a "shirt". The restaurant has a right to a dress code in order to eliminate tacky exhibitionists. Besides, she might sue them if she spilled hot coffee on the twins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2017, 04:00 PM
 
10,196 posts, read 9,917,370 times
Reputation: 24135
I think she looks great for 7.5 months pregnant with twins...but come on. That outfit is absurd. It was clearly attention seeking. Even if she didn't have a baby belly and her whole belly was sticking out like that, covered just to under the boobs, and then lower hips down, it wouldn't be an appropriate outfit for a restaurant setting.

I have no problem with people showing off their pregnant body, but that is really a stupid outfit to wear out and expect a restaurant to seat you. They might...but they also might not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2017, 04:12 PM
 
12,883 posts, read 14,035,584 times
Reputation: 18454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harpaint View Post
That crop top doesn't really qualify as a "shirt". The restaurant has a right to a dress code in order to eliminate tacky exhibitionists. Besides, she might sue them if she spilled hot coffee on the twins.
That's what I'm thinking, and as long as the restaurant is consistent with this, with all customers not just pregnant ones, then I see no issue with what happened here. While I find her outfit ridiculous and immature for a pregnant 35 year old (I read her age on another article), and really any 35 year old, I would find it a little messed up if the restaurant picked on her yet allowed other girls/women wearing crop tops in.

Maybe it does sound bad to say, but there's something about someone so pregnant wearing that outfit. It just makes it that much more inappropriate IMO. I mean, what is she thinking? If going for a walk at the beach, okay, but to go out to eat??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2017, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic
32,992 posts, read 36,519,796 times
Reputation: 43914
I don't want to see her personal beach ball. Skirt on the ground? That's really tacky and inappropriate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2017, 05:39 PM
 
4,994 posts, read 5,317,801 times
Reputation: 15763
I think pregnant women are beautiful. I don't like the look with that crop top. It wasn't a wholesome look and inappropriate for the restaurant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2017, 06:11 PM
 
Location: OHIO
2,575 posts, read 2,088,086 times
Reputation: 5967
I think the outfit looks stupid, but I also feel like if she has just been a thin and non-pregnant women there would have been no issue. Who knows though
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top