Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Diabetes
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-04-2017, 07:13 AM
 
Location: McAllen, TX
5,947 posts, read 5,469,216 times
Reputation: 6747

Advertisements

This is obvious for a lot of folks including me. Excessive sugar consumption was the cause of MY type 2 diabetes. My poison of choice was regular coke in excess amounts on a daily basis for years and years. Your's may be something else. My pancreas couldn't keep up and eventually broke down. IMO, genetics only play a small part with this disease. The main culprit is diet of course. The ADA spews out tons of misinformation all causing even more harm. Take a look if you wish.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gALMXv6KqMo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-06-2017, 02:36 PM
 
3,211 posts, read 2,975,319 times
Reputation: 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by gguerra View Post
IMO, genetics only play a small part with this disease. The main culprit is diet of course.
I have to wonder how my husband eats so many carbs, all day, every day, and his pancreas is fine. He eats cakes, pies, cookies, and candy all day long and has all his 60+ years...but he has no diabetes. There is no diabetes in his family.

I haven't had a sweet tooth (yes, I know not all carbs are sweet, but you get what I mean here) since I was a kid, have never been overweight, same with several other people in my family...but we have diabetes just like our mother and grandmother and various cousins.

IMO, genetics do play quite a role in this disease.

Last edited by oldgardener; 04-06-2017 at 04:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2017, 04:02 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,830 posts, read 25,109,733 times
Reputation: 19061
Quote:
Originally Posted by gguerra View Post
This is obvious for a lot of folks including me. Excessive sugar consumption was the cause of MY type 2 diabetes. My poison of choice was regular coke in excess amounts on a daily basis for years and years. Your's may be something else. My pancreas couldn't keep up and eventually broke down. IMO, genetics only play a small part with this disease. The main culprit is diet of course. The ADA spews out tons of misinformation all causing even more harm. Take a look if you wish.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gALMXv6KqMo
I just find it odd that a chiropractor is giving medical advise on diabetes. Not that the advise is really bad, a bit oversimplified but probably appropriate for the audience, but he's a chiropractor not an M.D. Not exactly his field of expertise. Also seems to be a quasi-quack. X-ray tech turned chiro turned "diet doctor." That said, yeah, drinking ingesting tons of sugar is not good and is correlated strongly with developing type II diabetes. Not sure why you think the ADA is spewing out that it's not.

Last edited by Malloric; 04-06-2017 at 04:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2017, 08:57 AM
 
Location: McAllen, TX
5,947 posts, read 5,469,216 times
Reputation: 6747
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldgardener View Post
I have to wonder how my husband eats so many carbs, all day, every day, and his pancreas is fine. He eats cakes, pies, cookies, and candy all day long and has all his 60+ years...but he has no diabetes. There is no diabetes in his family.

I haven't had a sweet tooth (yes, I know not all carbs are sweet, but you get what I mean here) since I was a kid, have never been overweight, same with several other people in my family...but we have diabetes just like our mother and grandmother and various cousins.

IMO, genetics do play quite a role in this disease.
IMO, yes genetics play a role in this disease and IMO type 2 diabetes is not really disease but a metaboloic disorder. This is only to the extent that if one person develops really bad eating habits, develops this condition and then has children then yes it's passed on. Much like being the child of an alcoholic is way more prone to becoming an alcoholic. The cycle can be broken with awareness but the genetic predisposition still exists and again IMO genetics make up less than a 25% chance. Of course this is impossible to calculate. This is why certain groups have a higher instance of diabetes, their culture and the diet that goes along with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malloric View Post
I just find it odd that a chiropractor is giving medical advise on diabetes. Not that the advise is really bad, a bit oversimplified but probably appropriate for the audience, but he's a chiropractor not an M.D. Not exactly his field of expertise. Also seems to be a quasi-quack. X-ray tech turned chiro turned "diet doctor." That said, yeah, drinking ingesting tons of sugar is not good and is correlated strongly with developing type II diabetes. Not sure why you think the ADA is spewing out that it's not.
You are certainly entitled to you opinion of Dr. Berg but the advice he gives IS completely valid and he backs it up with a lot of printed material from medical books.

The ADA is funded by Big Pharma and the food industry just like the guy says.
Our Corporate Supporters: American Diabetes Association®
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/25/health/25ada.htm

Their dietary guidelines are misguided and skewed and if followed closely will lead to MORE health complications instead of less. Eric Berg is not just giving out advice on diabetes but on ketogenic diets and alternative eating. He's the author of 7 books and it goes a bit deeper than just being a chiropractor. Let's just say he's well studied and is more educated than most other people posting diet advice on youtube. There are a lot of them by the way.
https://www.drberg.com/dr-eric-berg/bio
https://www.youtube.com/user/drericberg123

Richard Bernstein is a well respected diabetes specialist and here's a bit on what he thinks about the ADA. This guy knows his stuff.
ADA's Latest Low-Carb Stance Is Severely Flawed, Says Longtime Low-Carb Advocate Dr. Bernstein - Dr. Bernstein's Diabetes Solution. A Complete Guide to Achieving Normal Blood Sugars. Official Web Site
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Southern California
29,267 posts, read 16,731,407 times
Reputation: 18909
I've met many chiropractors who have gone on to study various other health issues. So I'm not surprised at the one above.

Just coming out of 3 rehabs for a knee mess, I came in contact with many diabetics, young ones insulin dependent. I believe too genetics plays a huge role.

But sugar is sure the devil. I did my share during my life and no diabetes..I have not touched a soda in mega years. Common sense and research.

I believe many don't know they have diabetes. Many poor don't get best medical treatment...like annual bloodwork.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:25 PM
 
17,533 posts, read 39,109,818 times
Reputation: 24289
There is SOOOO much more to "diabetes" than sugar intake. It is actually caused more by the bad trans-fats. It is a complicated issue, and sadly, most doctors have no idea about the causes or proper treatment. It does run in my family, so that I do believe is a factor in why I have it now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2017, 08:31 AM
 
9,850 posts, read 7,716,018 times
Reputation: 24485
Quote:
Originally Posted by gypsychic View Post
There is SOOOO much more to "diabetes" than sugar intake. It is actually caused more by the bad trans-fats. It is a complicated issue, and sadly, most doctors have no idea about the causes or proper treatment. It does run in my family, so that I do believe is a factor in why I have it now.
Trans-fats, like margarine?

My chiropractor and my dentist (which sounds silly, but he was a trusted, knowledgeable guy) warned us against eating margarine in the early 90's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 11:58 AM
 
17,533 posts, read 39,109,818 times
Reputation: 24289
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaraG View Post
Trans-fats, like margarine?

My chiropractor and my dentist (which sounds silly, but he was a trusted, knowledgeable guy) warned us against eating margarine in the early 90's.
Yes, like margarine and all the other hydrogenated industrial vegetable oils. The body cannot really process them and makes your cells like plastic, where nutrients cannot get through. They cause a lot of inflammation; which raises your blood glucose. Stick to real fats, animal fats, butter, coconut and olive oils, etc. There is info out ther on this if you google.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 04:36 PM
 
Location: The Driftless Area, WI
7,246 posts, read 5,117,125 times
Reputation: 17737
Quote:
Originally Posted by gypsychic View Post
There is SOOOO much more to "diabetes" than sugar intake. It is actually caused more by the bad trans-fats. It is a complicated issue, and sadly, most doctors have no idea about the causes or proper treatment. It does run in my family, so that I do believe is a factor in why I have it now.
Whoa! So much false info being passed along here on this thread. I picked this one to quote because trans-fats are not natural-- they're man-made (natural unsaturated oils are arificially hydrogenated to increase their melting point, making them solids-- like margarine).

If only trans-fats caused DM, then we shouldn't have anybody diabetic until after they had invented margarine.

Here's the real story: type II DM is in fact genetic (very complex, not a simple Mendelian dominate/recessive/ single gene thing)-- but you don't see it until a certain point later in life (kinda like baldness shows up later) WHEN a diet excessively high in carbs is taken-- a classic interplay of genetics AND environment--the old Nature + Nurture situation. That's why so many people can get away with eating all the carbs they want without becoming diabetic: they don't have necessary set of genes.

Elsewhere here I explained the survival value of "diabetes genes." In the jungle, they where a "healthier" genotype. In modern civilization, they represent "disease." Compare this to having a thick layer of fat under your skin: healthy if you're an Eskimo living near the North Pole, disease if you're a Ubangi living near the equator.

Type I is also an interplay of genes AND environment: people with certain immune cell genotypes develop antibodies to their own islet cells only after exposure to certain viruses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2017, 06:55 PM
 
386 posts, read 327,078 times
Reputation: 1037
Doctors get little to no training about nutrition in medical school. Medical professionals seek to treat the disease with pills and chemicals. Pharmacy companies do not want solutions or cures; they would lose money. I seek professionals that talk about nutrition, exercise, stretching, and solutions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Diabetes

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top