Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-12-2014, 04:57 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,182,943 times
Reputation: 46685

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
As in "once we start making content those will matter". Ignoring the massive issues they face wont change the reality of them.
Exactly. Nobody wants to listen to the voice of reason. I've had two different experiences with bubbles.

The first time was during the Dot Com bubble. I was called into to consult for a dot com starting up, a website for nurses. I sat there during the meeting and listened as they enthused over the feature-rich site, filled to the rafters with content. You name it, this site had it.

So at the end of the presentation, I flipped through the prospectus and asked, "Okay. Sounds great. Where's your revenue going to come from?" You would have thought that I had stood up, unzipped and urinated on the conference room table. I mean, I was the freaking killjoy in the room. Didn't I know that they had five million in investor capital? Didn't I understand a freaking thing? I respectfully declined the business and, a year later, they went under.

The other time was the real estate bubble. I was advising both a large mortgage-based bank and a number of developers. I was already worried about stunt mortgages, such as the 0% down, interest-only, and other kinds of mortgages. I was also noticing a difference in what kind of borrowers were coming into the market. Instead of people looking at a mortgage on a thirty-year note and deciding whether or not they could borrow the money, they were asking, "What's the biggest possible house I can get into for the smallest possible payment? ARM? I'll take it!"

What's more, the government was just egging things on and putting pressure on the banks to lend. I remember one senior underwriter telling me, "You know, it used to be when I turned someone down, I had to call the applicant. Now, I have to report to the government." Yes, there was serious pressure on lenders to lend, with charters being held hostage.

Of course, most banks were making hay, too. I was invited into another meeting where a Latino marketing specialist (A perfect legitimate field) presented to that same bank on how illegal aliens were the next great mortgage market. You read right. Illegal aliens. And as they guy ran through his powerpoint presentation, I watched all these bankers nod their heads in agreement. "Wait a minute," I thought to myself. "These guys are all about risk."

The lights came up and the presenter asked if there were any questions. I raised my hand and asked, "You mean you would recommend lending money to $250,000 to someone who could be deported the day after closing?" You would have thought I had asked the most terrible question possible.

You know what the most telling reply was? "Oh, CPG, we don't have to worry about that. Once we close the loan, we're just going to sell the paper upstream to someone else. They'll deal with the risk." After that meeting, I literally drove home and put our house on the market, because I knew things were spiraling out of control. Sold the house at the top of the market and bought a less expensive place on the equity.

I also had similar conversations with builders. These guys were just convinced the market was going to keep climbing with values going up 10-15% a year. In 2006, I told all four of my builder clients to stop developing, at least anything requiring a Jumbo loan. Only one guy decided to hold off. He's the only one in business today.

So when I look at the China thing, I see a lot of people kidding themselves. There's this childlike faith in a country that is doubling down on some very risky stuff, cutting corners in terms of financial reporting, and ignoring the people who point out the obvious . The demographics aren't there. The regulatory environment isn't there. The market isn't there. I just don't think it's going to end well at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2014, 07:47 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,585 posts, read 17,310,316 times
Reputation: 37356
Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
I tried to have a conversation about China's problem with some Chinese nationals from China but they have only optimism that China will take over the world's super power from the US one day.

Issues about copying and innovation will be resolved eventually they say.
Back in '92 the Japanese felt that way. Called America "Japan's subcontractor". Referred to "Lazy American Workers".
A Top Japanese Politician Calls U.S. Work Force Lazy - NYTimes.com

Things change. Their recessions seems permanent.

Bring it on, China. We gave you a 2000 year head start. Now let's see whatyagot!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2014, 10:12 PM
 
2,485 posts, read 2,220,175 times
Reputation: 2140
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
Exactly. Nobody wants to listen to the voice of reason. I've had two different experiences with bubbles.

The first time was during the Dot Com bubble. I was called into to consult for a dot com starting up, a website for nurses. I sat there during the meeting and listened as they enthused over the feature-rich site, filled to the rafters with content. You name it, this site had it.

So at the end of the presentation, I flipped through the prospectus and asked, "Okay. Sounds great. Where's your revenue going to come from?" You would have thought that I had stood up, unzipped and urinated on the conference room table. I mean, I was the freaking killjoy in the room. Didn't I know that they had five million in investor capital? Didn't I understand a freaking thing? I respectfully declined the business and, a year later, they went under.

The other time was the real estate bubble. I was advising both a large mortgage-based bank and a number of developers. I was already worried about stunt mortgages, such as the 0% down, interest-only, and other kinds of mortgages. I was also noticing a difference in what kind of borrowers were coming into the market. Instead of people looking at a mortgage on a thirty-year note and deciding whether or not they could borrow the money, they were asking, "What's the biggest possible house I can get into for the smallest possible payment? ARM? I'll take it!"

What's more, the government was just egging things on and putting pressure on the banks to lend. I remember one senior underwriter telling me, "You know, it used to be when I turned someone down, I had to call the applicant. Now, I have to report to the government." Yes, there was serious pressure on lenders to lend, with charters being held hostage.

Of course, most banks were making hay, too. I was invited into another meeting where a Latino marketing specialist (A perfect legitimate field) presented to that same bank on how illegal aliens were the next great mortgage market. You read right. Illegal aliens. And as they guy ran through his powerpoint presentation, I watched all these bankers nod their heads in agreement. "Wait a minute," I thought to myself. "These guys are all about risk."

The lights came up and the presenter asked if there were any questions. I raised my hand and asked, "You mean you would recommend lending money to $250,000 to someone who could be deported the day after closing?" You would have thought I had asked the most terrible question possible.

You know what the most telling reply was? "Oh, CPG, we don't have to worry about that. Once we close the loan, we're just going to sell the paper upstream to someone else. They'll deal with the risk." After that meeting, I literally drove home and put our house on the market, because I knew things were spiraling out of control. Sold the house at the top of the market and bought a less expensive place on the equity.

I also had similar conversations with builders. These guys were just convinced the market was going to keep climbing with values going up 10-15% a year. In 2006, I told all four of my builder clients to stop developing, at least anything requiring a Jumbo loan. Only one guy decided to hold off. He's the only one in business today.

So when I look at the China thing, I see a lot of people kidding themselves. There's this childlike faith in a country that is doubling down on some very risky stuff, cutting corners in terms of financial reporting, and ignoring the people who point out the obvious . The demographics aren't there. The regulatory environment isn't there. The market isn't there. I just don't think it's going to end well at all.
I disagree. China has lots of cards. If one or two fall, they still have many other cards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 01:26 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
3,158 posts, read 6,127,613 times
Reputation: 5619
China has a huge population problem.

Even though the government has relaxed the One Child Policy, its legacy will remain, specifically:

-- most parents today do not want more than one child, and
-- currently there is a surplus of about 45 million males.

Here is a graphic reminder of what China is facing.
(.pdf file)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 06:32 AM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,182,943 times
Reputation: 46685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Costaexpress View Post
I disagree. China has lots of cards. If one or two fall, they still have many other cards.
Based on what? They have other cards. But those are all part of a house of cards that constitutes the jury-rigged financial system combined with a very bad demographic trend. It affects everything. Financing for business. Real estate. Investment. Acquisition of raw materials.

Look, if you want to believe that, okay. But the demographic problem isn't just one thing. It's huge, something that cannot just be shrugged off, especially when you realize that China is going to have a very tough time moving to a post-industrial economy AND deal with years of state-driven malinvestment. Nope. China has some very hard history ahead of it starting very soon.

Last edited by cpg35223; 05-13-2014 at 06:40 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 10:29 AM
 
1,971 posts, read 3,045,819 times
Reputation: 2209
China has two cards, the US dollars they own and their manufacturing capability. That is it. They are behind the 8 ball on many very basic issues like food, water, environment and demographics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 10:50 AM
 
18,806 posts, read 8,481,648 times
Reputation: 4131
Quote:
Originally Posted by rzzz View Post
China has two cards, the US dollars they own and their manufacturing capability. That is it. They are behind the 8 ball on many very basic issues like food, water, environment and demographics.
They have another card, that is their people. And if the Chinese central command plays their cards right, in a generation China will have huge consumer potential. And as we know here in the USA, consumerism is a large part of economic success.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 87,022,277 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
If I owe you some money then that is my problem. If I owe you millions then its your problem.
That reminds me of the Turkish joke, about the man who was tossing and turning in the middle of the night, and his wife asked what's the matter He said "I owe our neighbor Mustafa 100,000 lira, due tomorrow, and I have no money to pay him". His wife goes to the open window and yells out "Hey, Mustafa, my husband has no money to pay you tomorrow. Now it is your problem. We are going to sleep. Goodnight."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 02:06 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,182,943 times
Reputation: 46685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
They have another card, that is their people. And if the Chinese central command plays their cards right, in a generation China will have huge consumer potential. And as we know here in the USA, consumerism is a large part of economic success.
You keep talking about the next generation in complete denial of the demographic *hitstorm that's about to hit that country. The next generation will be dealing with a huge imbalance between working-age Chinese and elderly Chinese. It is going to be tremendous and suck up enormous amounts of money. What's more, China simply does not have the sophisticated investment instruments for retirement that the United States has. The key to wealth in China has been to invest in real estate, yet the Chinese real estate bubble is very well documented at this point. The only remaining question is when it's going to pop.

Ongoing innovation is the driver of the United States' economic success. The average middle-class Chinese will likely never have anywhere close to the buying power of the average middle-class American. Not in this century, anyway. Maybe ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 02:16 PM
 
18,806 posts, read 8,481,648 times
Reputation: 4131
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
You keep talking about the next generation in complete denial of the demographic *hitstorm that's about to hit that country. The next generation will be dealing with a huge imbalance between working-age Chinese and elderly Chinese. It is going to be tremendous and suck up enormous amounts of money. What's more, China simply does not have the sophisticated investment instruments for retirement that the United States has. The key to wealth in China has been to invest in real estate, yet the Chinese real estate bubble is very well documented at this point. The only remaining question is when it's going to pop.

Ongoing innovation is the driver of the United States' economic success. The average middle-class Chinese will likely never have anywhere close to the buying power of the average middle-class American. Not in this century, anyway. Maybe ever.
Sure. They will have internal economic turmoil as we with our own Medicare/SS. But overall when China presents itself and the world another billion consumers, grand things will happen. And yes they will have to manufacture huge numbers of Yuan for themselves and the world. That will take time. I might not see it for myself, but I would think it closer to a generation than 100 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top