Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-19-2012, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,963 posts, read 17,950,846 times
Reputation: 10385

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
The problem with the housing bubble was that the mortgages got wrapped as CDS, stamped AAA, and sold around the world as sound investments. Those manipulating the market knew the CDS were bad and betted against them. The government's role in the problem was not regulating the banking industry to stop the fraud.
What you described was throwing fuel on an already burning fire.
The government failed twice. Manipulating the free market in the housing industry by lowering the lending standards especially the zero to 5 percent down payment. Bankers didnt make those loans in the past because they knew they were too risky. Freddie and Fannie to the rescue to insure those loans with taxpayer money.
The Federal Reserve lowered the interest rates to below market which encouraged the "free money" mal investment. We saw housing prices sore even though demand stayed up with supply. We see the soaring costs of education through the same government backing.

Not need for the regulation if you allow the free market to exist and let the ones who made the bad economic decisions fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2012, 02:25 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,801,452 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
What you described was throwing fuel on an already burning fire.
The government failed twice. Manipulating the free market in the housing industry by lowering the lending standards especially the zero to 5 percent down payment. Bankers didnt make those loans in the past because they knew they were too risky. Freddie and Fannie to the rescue to insure those loans with taxpayer money.
The Federal Reserve lowered the interest rates to below market which encouraged the "free money" mal investment. We saw housing prices sore even though demand stayed up with supply. We see the soaring costs of education through the same government backing.

Not need for the regulation if you allow the free market to exist and let the ones who made the bad economic decisions fail.
Wrong. If we didn't deregulate wall street and actually kept glass steagall, the recession wouldn't have been as harsh. The government plays a role in the crisis by fueling the housing bubble, but it created a global crisis/recession by allowing those mortgages to get wrapped up as CDS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
5,864 posts, read 4,996,786 times
Reputation: 4207
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Things are not always what they seem...especially in politics. We argue and debate, but very often miss the nuances and machinations of what is actually going on. Good article....



More here..
Why do conservatives want Paul Ryan to be vice president?
"Conservatives" (so called) want Ryan because he represents their views: police state, "conservative" welfare state, large federal budgets, imperialism, fiat currency etc. True conservatives get fooled into voting for a guy like Ryan because the media hype is so unbelievable and the cries of "austerity" from the left are so hysterical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
5,864 posts, read 4,996,786 times
Reputation: 4207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Wrong. If we didn't deregulate wall street and actually kept glass steagall, the recession wouldn't have been as harsh. The government plays a role in the crisis by fueling the housing bubble, but it created a global crisis/recession by allowing those mortgages to get wrapped up as CDS.
You say "deregulation" like the government just got out of the economy altogether and just let the market work on it's own. That couldn't be more patently false. The Fed is there manipulating interest rates and sending wrong signals to investors. Don't forget about Fannie and Freddie and the Community Reinvestment Act. The government had their dirty little fingers everywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 04:43 PM
 
Location: West Texas
2,366 posts, read 1,653,873 times
Reputation: 2561
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
The hard right wing nutcases don't care. They just believe the fodder their propaganda masters tell them and obediently hit (R) at every election like the good sheep they are.
The hard LEFT wing nutcases don't care. They just believe the fodder their propaganda masters tell them and obediently hit (D) at every election like the good sheep they are.

Works both ways but your comment really adds nothing to the discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 06:52 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,862 posts, read 46,787,593 times
Reputation: 18523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nayabone View Post
No one but the insane would want RP. He is a nice old man. Nothing more. He will benefit greatly from the R/R presidency as a senior..


I totally understand tip toeing right around the real Conservative, v. a Progressive, relabeled a Conservative for effect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,636,447 times
Reputation: 1680
Exclamation lol...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
I just find it funny that the GOP's "ideas guy" and point man on the the budget and fiscal discipline is the same guy who voted for TARP, the auto bailout, Medicare prescription drug expansion, the Iraq War, and tax cuts that were not offset with spending cuts. His budget won't balance the budget until 2040. Too funny.
Paul Ryan has absolutely no intention of balancing the budget. His primary goal is to spend as much money on the Tea Party's priority's as possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2012, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,344,100 times
Reputation: 11416
I think that they want Ryan on the ticket so that the RomneyRyan logo can be shared with Rolls Royce.

See top center: Rolls-Royce Motor Cars Home
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2012, 09:25 AM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,489,445 times
Reputation: 6671
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
Great article, and it backs up what I've been saying about the situation all along--with Ryan on the ticket, this race is going to be a duke em out between the tea party and the rest of the country over the direction we want to go as a nation. If the R's lose, then the tea party is history and the republican party can start movign back toward the center, and to the common sense conservatism that it used to stand for. Good riddance to the nuts on the extremist evangelical right...
Exactly, and even the WSJ's case for a so-called “big election over big issues” is simply another way of waging the same fight as the the Tea Party fanatics. Except beneath it all, is still the same sense of narcissistic entitlement and unrepentant Wall Street greed that got us here in the first place... albeit now gussied up in Ryan's somewhat more "respectable" (and pedantic) rhetoric, instead of the typically more "earthy" and "primitive" approach of the "base".

It's kinda like the Southern Strategy... where the message is still basically the same, but you just gotta make some of the words (and the "messenger"), look a little more "purty"!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2012, 09:44 AM
 
10,793 posts, read 13,577,311 times
Reputation: 6189
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Things are not always what they seem...especially in politics. We argue and debate, but very often miss the nuances and machinations of what is actually going on. Good article....



More here..
Why do conservatives want Paul Ryan to be vice president?

Why do Dems want Uncle Joe to be theirs????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top