Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-21-2016, 11:02 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,971,391 times
Reputation: 6059

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
All democrats want free stuff.
Better to redirect national resources towards quality of life of Americans than giving free stuff to bankers, war corporations and the pharma drug cartels. The big problem for many is that they direct their attention towards starvin' Marvin on $50 foodstamps as the source of the problem and not trillions robbed by the financial overlords of the puppets they elect.

 
Old 02-21-2016, 12:04 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,502,666 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Better to redirect national resources towards quality of life of Americans than giving free stuff to bankers, war corporations and the pharma drug cartels. The big problem for many is that they direct their attention towards starvin' Marvin on $50 foodstamps as the source of the problem and not trillions robbed by the financial overlords of the puppets they elect.
Exactly. The Rs are happy to bend over backwards for the large corporations that get corporate welfare. Because they think the Dems are all welfare queens. This is exactly what big corporations have programmed them to think, although it's not true.

Big corporates and PACs tricked the R voters into this idea (welfare queen) so that the corporations can continue to keep their corporate welfare while they push commercials with welfare queens in front of the lemming "R" voters, to ensure those voters continue to vote in the best interest of the corporations rather than voting for their own best interests.
 
Old 02-21-2016, 04:08 PM
 
1,553 posts, read 926,272 times
Reputation: 1659
Old man Sanders hit his high water mark in NH.

Will be all...

D
O
W
N
H
I
L
L

...from here...



CLINTON(S) 2016
 
Old 02-21-2016, 10:20 PM
 
2,973 posts, read 1,977,564 times
Reputation: 1080
New Emerson poll shows Clinton and Sanders tied in MA! Going to be a tight race
 
Old 02-21-2016, 10:22 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,971,391 times
Reputation: 6059
Nevada caucus:

 
Old 02-22-2016, 06:41 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,660,176 times
Reputation: 21097
^Unfortunately for Sanders, the "youth vote", especially under 25, has relatively low turnout compare to the older voters. Middle Age and Senior voters usually have very high turnout.
 
Old 02-22-2016, 07:09 AM
 
2,886 posts, read 5,828,756 times
Reputation: 1885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daywalk View Post
New Emerson poll shows Clinton and Sanders tied in MA! Going to be a tight race
Clinton has this in the bag. Even when Sander's beats her she still manages to get more delegates. She already has 502 delegates, Sander's only has 70 delegates.
 
Old 02-22-2016, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,632,612 times
Reputation: 2202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daywalk View Post
New Emerson poll shows Clinton and Sanders tied in MA! Going to be a tight race
Michigan is also on play. I suspect MA, Michigan, Colorado, Oklahoma, and of course VT. Victories there should give him impetus for larger states moving forward. Will his campaign funds hold out? The Establishment is pulling out all the stops.
 
Old 02-22-2016, 08:28 AM
 
2,973 posts, read 1,977,564 times
Reputation: 1080
Quote:
Originally Posted by richrf View Post
Michigan is also on play. I suspect MA, Michigan, Colorado, Oklahoma, and of course VT. Victories there should give him impetus for larger states moving forward. Will his campaign funds hold out? The Establishment is pulling out all the stops.
Michigan is a bit difficult since Hillary leads by double digits in all 4 recent polls. With 2 weeks to go and with so many states needing to campaign in, it won't change that much.
 
Old 02-22-2016, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,231,792 times
Reputation: 38267
Quote:
In the Democratic contest, support breaks along gender lines with men favoring Sanders
60% to 35% and women preferring Clinton 56% to 34%. As in previous primaries and
caucuses, Sanders has a significant edge over Clinton with younger voters, although not by
the same large margins seen elsewhere. Among the 18-34 age group, he has a 24-point
advantage (59% to 35%).
His lead drops to 10 points in the 35-54 category, with Sanders
ahead 51% to 41%. Clinton has a 51% to 46% edge with those 55-74, and a better than 50-
point margin (67% to 16%) with voters 75 and above.
http://media.wix.com/ugd/3bebb2_d5ea...e2908ea509.pdf

Interesting. So I guess Bernie is starting to lose his momentum with younger voters.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top