Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes but this illegal immigration thing is really just to screw the people and the society who you claim to care.
I'd rather have an illegal immigrant that works hard than a home grown American that sits on his ass whining about what he wasn't given. Honestly, I see a ton of the latter in regards to welfare dependency, and almost none of the former.
He just continues to throw out that phrase "50 million poor people" even though he refuses to back that number up with anything that even resembles reality. It's like he thinks if he repeats it often enough it will become true. We get a very good glimpse into the OP's ability to reason in this thread, which would be really embarrassing for the OP if he had the ability to be cognizant of that fact. Happily for him, it appears he doesn't.
Post 104.
So is getting screwed 11 million times more acceptable than 50?
I am just curious why Democrat voters would vote for Democrats to screw themselves and the poor 50 million times.
Why would Republicans voters vote Republican to screw themselves and the poor 100 millions times? In the end you would be mistaken to think either party has your best interest at heart.
I'd rather have an illegal immigrant that works hard than a home grown American that sits on his ass whining about what he wasn't given. Honestly, I see a ton of the latter in regards to welfare dependency, and almost none of the former.
You surely have little love for your own countrymen.
But you don't support any Republican policy to cut welfare?
Why would Republicans voters vote Republican to screw themselves and the poor 100 millions times? In the end you would be mistaken to think either party has your best interest at heart.
Please provide the source for your 100 million.
I have no illusion about Republican either. I am just curious why voting for Democrats to import MORE poverty to screw the poor Americans.
Wrong. Provide proof of any candidate who wants to bring in 50 million immigrants. You repeating the same ignorant post doesn't make it true. Back it up or shut it.
I have no illusion about Republican either. I am just curious why voting for Democrats to import MORE poverty to screw the poor Americans.
There is no source for mine. Just like there is no source for your assertion that the rolls will increase by that many. My point is both parties are out to screw the poor American. Why would you vote for either when it has been shown time and time again that they don't have the average Americans best interest in mind?
Wrong. Provide proof. Otherwise, this thread is bunk.
I am fine with Clinton and Sanders' number: 11 million, to which they have no reliable source.
Is getting screwed 11 million times acceptable to the poor?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Your wasting your time voting for either one.
