Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-06-2016, 05:04 PM
 
Location: N Atlanta
4,584 posts, read 4,201,005 times
Reputation: 2323

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
When you consider that means that 63% of Republicans don't support him, I don't consider 37% to be remarkable at all.
Since the percentages are considerably less for Cruz / Kasich / Rubio / Jeb & the other 12 pretenders, looks like the GOP is in a pickle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-06-2016, 05:12 PM
 
6,129 posts, read 6,813,834 times
Reputation: 10821
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftee View Post
Why not if every other candidate is way behind you in votes ?
Those rules have been in place a long time, WAY before Trump. The standard is if you are going to represent the party, you need to get at least half of them to vote for you. A majority. That's why you have to have more than half the total available delegates. It's a sensible rule, and no one has had trouble reaching it until now. Why should 40% of the people choose who represents the other 60%?

That said he still might, it's not over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 05:14 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,526,696 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinawina View Post
Those rules have been in place a long time, WAY before Trump. The standard is if you are going to represent the party, you need to get at least half of them to vote for you. A majority. That's why you have to have more than half the total available delegates. It's a sensible rule, and no one has had trouble reaching it until now. Why should 40% of the people choose who represents the other 60%?

He still might, it's not over.
Trump and his supporters do not believe that anything as "rules" or the requirement of such a quaint notion as a "majority" should apply to Donald Trump. They apparently regard him as being beyond all of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 05:29 PM
 
Location: N Atlanta
4,584 posts, read 4,201,005 times
Reputation: 2323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinawina View Post
Those rules have been in place a long time, WAY before Trump. The standard is if you are going to represent the party, you need to get at least half of them to vote for you. A majority. That's why you have to have more than half the total available delegates. It's a sensible rule, and no one has had trouble reaching it until now. Why should 40% of the people choose who represents the other 60%?

That said he still might, it's not over.
You do know it's possible to have 1,237 delegates with less than 50% of the popular vote, right ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 05:35 PM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,537,988 times
Reputation: 18618
Apparently Trump is pulling out of Colorado. He's cancelled his rallies in Denver and Colorado Springs and will not be appearing at the state GOP convention on Saturday.

http://www.denverpost.com/election/c...ntion-saturday
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 05:39 PM
 
Location: N Atlanta
4,584 posts, read 4,201,005 times
Reputation: 2323
Quote:
Originally Posted by biscuitmom View Post
Apparently Trump is pulling out of Colorado. He's cancelled his rally in Denver and will not be appearing at the state GOP convention on Saturday.

Donald Trump a no-show for Colorado GOP convention Saturday - The Denver Post
Probably got the word that it's already rigged for Cruz.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 05:42 PM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,537,988 times
Reputation: 18618
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftee View Post
Probably got the word that it's already rigged for Cruz.
That's one way of putting it. Another way is that his campaign staff inexcusably didn't have a grasp of the CO GOP delegate process. It's a messy and complex insider affair but there's nothing secret about it; if Cruz's campaign staff could work it so could Trump's.

(I'm a HRC supporter so have no dog in this fight.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 05:53 PM
 
27,156 posts, read 15,330,669 times
Reputation: 12077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livejack View Post
Trump has turned not just his own campaign, but everything and everyone around him as well as the process, into a hot mess this cycle.

If he truly wanted to end it he could just release his tax returns. Can't imagine that a genius businessman like him doesn't have some conflict of interest or misrepresentations in either his past, present, future, or all that would be damaging to his campaign...

Wait, we're talking about Trump supporters here. Don't think even he had any idea how many gullible people there are running around...




The number of supporters of Clinton and Sanders illustrates how many very clearly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 06:23 PM
 
6,129 posts, read 6,813,834 times
Reputation: 10821
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftee View Post
You do know it's possible to have 1,237 delegates with less than 50% of the popular vote, right ?
Oy. LOL. Yes, it is technically possible. But it is not very likely, and doing so would not be in the spirit the rule was written. It would be taking advantage of a loophole. And the person would be highly likely to be very close to half the popular vote anyway.

In any case, Trump still may make his required delegate count regardless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 06:29 PM
 
Location: N Atlanta
4,584 posts, read 4,201,005 times
Reputation: 2323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinawina View Post
Oy. LOL. Yes, it is technically possible. But it is not very likely, and doing so would not be in the spirit the rule was written. It would be taking advantage of a loophole. And the person would be highly likely to be very close to half the popular vote anyway.

In any case, Trump still may make his required delegate count regardless.
He needs 57% of the remaining delegates and that % is bound to go down after the Northeast primaries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top