Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The worst manager I ever had (he was a very nice person, though) could NEVER come to a decision. In his non-work time he had some kind of job with either the Reserves or the National Guard also in a leadership position. He had to check with a zillion people before he decided anything and I do mean anything.
The only downside I see for a woman is dealing with anyone in the Middle East. That's actually a big deal these days.
And, yet, so many other countries have put women in charge, despite the ME. Why would the US be chicken of that, if England and Germany can do it?
You cant discuss it because youre stuck in PC land? Is that what you were saying?
Trump is overly reactive, overly emotional, hyper-sensitive, irrational, bitchy, switchy / indecisive, often confused, vindictive and conniving.
Those are just a few of his traits. And one or more of those traits are often assigned (still ) to women and some of those traits have been used against women re; them being in leadership roles.
Status:
"Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge."
(set 7 days ago)
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,604,359 times
Reputation: 5697
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc
You libs really want a woman making decisions for a country? I cant wrap my head around that...they are so indecisive and poor leaders. Just not the right job for a woman. In charge of a military? A budget? Really? You guys need to think this through.
The UK's having a second go-around with it within the past 37 years: Margaret Thatcher from 1979 to 1990 or 91. Teresa May starting practically right now. Both Conservative Party members. Even several Southern states, conservative as they are, have had female governors (TX. LA, AL, and SC for sure. Maybe a few others I'm missing). I heard no complaints about their gender and/or birth sex.
I suppose there's always gonna be that hard core five to ten percent who'll say "Now go make me a sandwich and grab me a beer". C'est la vive.
And, yet, so many other countries have put women in charge, despite the ME. Why would the US be chicken of that, if England and Germany can do it?
Well, HRC has dealt with heads of state and ministers in the Middle East as Secretary of State. They have given her the protocol as appropriate for any national official.
Some of the countries who have had past or current female heads of state: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia, Canada, Iceland, Argentina, Chile, Brazil, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Israel, Liberia, South Korea.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
) to women and some of those traits have been used against women re; them being in leadership roles.
